similar to: Samba 3.0.0/2a fails on W2k/98 side, perfect with smbclient

Hi everybody, I failed to make Samba 3.0.0 /3.0.2a working from Windows side on the slightly different Slackware?s. Last try was the ?current? Slackware version(kernel 2.4.25) of some March 20?s with Samba 3.0.2a in it. Server: Asus P4P800-PIV?RAM 1.5(1)Gb- 3Com 3C940 integrated. Client(s): W2k SP3, Realtek 8139 NIC. Installed OK (binaries from a distribution?), user added OK after

My systems: rh61, 2.2.14 + smbfs-nls.patch. I refer to 2.0.7pre3 as 2.0.7 === 1) "ls" of an empty dir 1a) 1.9.18 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls 49550 blocks of size 16384. 33754 blocks available 1b) 2.0.7 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls ERRDOS - ERRbadfile (File not found.) listing \* <=======

Dear Jeremy. Really appreciate you took your time to answer. I had already reviewed source4/client/client.c looking for mput (cmd_mput) command, but unluckily saying that my C programming skills are poor woud be really overrating them. I'm sorry to disagree for two reasons 1-. It works for mget, true that the source code is completely different. 2-. If taking a look into smbclient man

Dear folks. Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 distribution is not the most up to date version I should test this on, as it also limits how easy is compiling most recent versions of Samba, but I assume though this is not a tricky test, and should work as documented in both 4.4 and 4.2

Hi All, I'm an Amiga user of samba. All is well with server and client except recursive mput within smbclient. It transfers nothing, and reports no errors. Can anyone help? My samba version is 1.9.16p9. More detail: I started with BIN: pointing to amitcp:samba/bin in which I placed sh, as recommended. I found without recurs set that mput #? (or mput *) reported that it could not find ls

Dear all. Confirmed: compilation of 4.12.6 produces same result, mput + recurse ignores mask for files. Will you please tell me if you need further details, or which steps I should follow? Should I file a bug? Many thanks. Best regards. El mar., 25 ago. 2020 a las 9:52, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear Andrew. > > You are right, I should have taken a deeper look

I'm about to build a server. I want to use a P4, and have lotsa RAM, I don't need audio, I do want to do RAID, but I'll do software RAID if hw isn't available for IDE. the RH hardware list seems rather woefully out of date, does anyone have any recommendations for a good motherboard guaranteed to work? I'm looking at ASUS P4P800-E-deluxe which has a driver on the ASUS site

Dear Rowland. So sorry, I did not get the responses to this e-mail address, got them by the purest change googling again. I'm sorry to disagree with your approach: 1-. In my most recent updates you should have seen I am compiling Samba4 from source. Began with packaged distribution, but considering it might be a bug, I decided to test myself. 4 different versions, same behaviour. This means

Dear all. I would like to propose a possible way to make mget and mput behave more or less the same way, rather that just changing documentation. Please, bear in mind this is a poor attempt coming from a person with no C skills at all, so other than testing that only filtered files are transferred, I have not gone further. Hope at least to have been able not to corrupt any pointer, but I'm

Searching the archives I have seen this questions asked 2 times prior with no response. Here's the problem: I am using SMBCLIENT to backup a directory structure to a share on a Windows NT 4 Server. I execute the following commands upon establishing a connection to the NT server: > recurse > prompt > lcd /directory/to/backup > mask * > mput * // I've also tried

Dear folks. I am using smbclient 4.2.10 version (the one packaged for OEL 6, samba4-client-4.2.10-15.el6.x86_64), and observing a weird behaviour of the tool. I've got a Linux local directorio, say /tmp/eraseme, with a couple of subdirectories in it, say a and b, each one containing a dummy file, say a/AM.xls and b/AT.xls If I run: smbclient -d 30 -l /var/log/samba -m SMB3 -W

Dear fellows. Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V Version 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}" Try "help" to get a list of

Dear Andrew. You are right, I should have taken a deeper look into the standard output during compilation. I did just assume source4 was the one for Samba4. Anyway, besides the source confusion (really, even if I had found the right one, following the code would have been out of my reach), I don't seem to find how that is related with the documentation issue, or the mput/mask/recurse

Hi, There is a problem with smbclient mput ( maybe more, I haven't checked ) with the SAMBA CVS I checked out on March 14, 2000. The problem will manifest itself on systems that don't support -maxdepth on the find command. (AIX being one of them ). I compared source/client.c between 2.0.6 and the cvs. The problem is in: static void cmd_mput(void) When recurse=false Version 2.0.6

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:15:48PM +0200, LPC DPG via samba wrote: > Dear fellows. > > Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V > Version 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient

Hi, When I tried to run smbclient against a Win2003 server copiyng hundred of files it aborts with segmentation fault. I ran in gdb that produces this: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- htmaster:/dados# gdb /usr/bin/smbclient -s /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/smbclient GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free

A new update. Same behaviour with 4.6.16. Exact issue as Bug 1249. Many thanks. Kind regards. El lun., 24 ago. 2020 a las 12:23, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear folks. > > Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 > and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 > distribution is not the most up to date

Hi all, hopefully someone in the list will be able to advise me on what to do with a problem that's bugging me. I have a number of machines that simply have problems understanding "localboot 0". My configuration is such that after the machines happily remotely install via PXE+kickstart the "default" file on the PXE server will resort to telling the client to boot from

Hi Rask, I installed the GG ls, as you suggested, and some other directory commands (rm, dir, ..) as well, into amitcp:samba/bin. BIN: is assigned to this. My path looks here first before amitcp:bin. I still get no action for mput *, with recurs on, and mask *. Also, lcd prints nothing as well. Can you suggest anything else? Am I missing something else, perhaps? Cheers, Chris. On 15 Dec 97

-------- --Multipart_Thu_Apr__8_13:33:51_1999-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Hello guys, I always wondered why smbclient keeps timestamp in `put'ting a file but does not keep it in `get'ting a file. Alternative to keep the time stamp in `get'ting file is to use -Tc option or smbtar script, but they are a bit hairy for interactive use, and it can only dump files with an