Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches similar to: "2.2.19/0.0.7a assertion failure"
2002 Aug 20
0
0.0.7a for kernel 2.2.19 concerns
Hi everyone, I've been reading this mailing list once in a while and I have
seen that there are quite a few bugs that were resolved since EXT 0.0.7a.
I was wondering if using 0.0.7a with kernel 2.2.19 is dangerous or ok
because I have had some corrupted files once in a while (using compact flash
disk CF on IDE bus).
0.0.7a is the only patch available for kernel 2.2.19 to my knowledge are
2001 Nov 06
1
ext3 0.0.7a OK for linux 2.2.20?
Hello,
Now that kernel 2.2.20 is out with security fixes, I'd be interested
in using it with ext3. The latest patch for 2.2.19, 0.0.7a, applies
with some offset (both with and without kdb), and even compiles
(without kdb), but I scarcely know what I am doing so haven't tried
it yet.
Could people in the know enlighten me on that point? I guess there
is little chance for another ext3
2001 Oct 18
0
2.2.19+0.0.7a assert in transaction.c:journal_start()
We have a machine that is trying its darndest to house a linux kernel
cvs repository.
The machine is a dual 733mhz p3 netfinity of some kind. 512M of mem.
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 16484504 4015876 11631240 26% /
/dev/sda2 31079 3199 26276 11% /boot
/dev/sdb2 16516084 32828 15644264 1%
2001 Jul 13
0
0.0.7a + rh2.2.19: help solve rejects
I get 2 rejects applying 2.2.19-ext3 to latest errata rh 2.2.19 kernel.
1)
fs/buffer.c
Should I put "J_ASSERT(buf->b_count > 0);" before or after " *(int *)0 = 0;"?
===== ext3 0.0.7a patch
--- 934,946 ----
if (buf->b_count) {
buf->b_count--;
+ if (!buf->b_count &&
+ (buf->b_jlist != BJ_None && buf->b_jlist
2001 Jun 06
1
ext3-0.0.7a for 2.2.19 is released
Hi all,
ext3-0.0.7a is now out, at the usual places:
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
and propagating now from
ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/
This fixes one major bug in ext3 recovery for metadata-only
journaling. Because recovery can also happen in e2fsck, users should
also upgrade to at least e2fsprogs-1.21-WIP-0601 (also provided at the
above ftp sites).
2001 Jun 28
1
Is there a 0.0.7a patch for redhat 2.2.19 errata?
The latest errata kernel-2.2.19-6.2.7.src.rpm contains old patches
linux-2.2.17-ext3.patch
linux-2.2.17-kdb+ext3.patch
Is there somewhere a 0.0.7a version of the above that will patch cleanly in the
errata kernel (considering all the other patches that get applied before ext3)?
I read about
ftp://ftp.clusterfilesystem.com/pub/ext3
but when I do
$ rpm -qpl
2001 Nov 13
1
Oops in 2.2.20 with ext3-0.0.7a
One of our servers (false) just oopsed. In the middle of lunch. Any
advise?
On console:
false kernel: Assertion failure in journal_start() at transaction.c line
245: "handle->h_transaction->t_journal == journal"
In kernel log (ran it through ksymoops):
Nov 13 12:35:37 false kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000
Nov 13 12:35:37
2001 Aug 06
1
Bug: 2.2.20pre/ext3 0.0.7a crash apparently in sys_close()
Apologies for a vague and wooly bug report, but I can't reproduce this
on my test systems - I *can* reproduce it on some production ones like a
flash.... but that seems to upset our operations guys :-(
I am getting a set of crashes on some boxes in the field, apparently
related to high network traffic (this only occurs on boxes with ethernet
connectivity back to the centre rather than the
2001 Aug 02
0
ext3 0.0.7a Assertion
Hi,
Doing the following I can generate an assertion in ext3 0.0.7a.
I have an ext3 filesystem on /foo. I export /foo via nfs. I then mount
via localhost:/foo onto /mnt. Start up a dd to generate a file on the nfs
mount. (cd /mnt; dd if=/dev/zero of=./dd.out bs=1024k), then on the
localhost filesystem /foo I rm the file. rm -f /foo/dd.out.
This results in "ext3_free_inode: bit already
2001 Jul 07
2
broken ext3 fs after "poweroff" ext3 0.0.7a/2.2.19 wip 1.21
Hi,
after my X froze i had a fs inconsistency after the journal replay
[...]
EXT3-fs: 03:06: 1 orphan inode deleted
EXT3-fs: recovery complete.
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 64k freed
INIT: version 2.78 booting
Loading /etc/console-tools/default.kmap.gz
Activating swap...
Adding Swap: 264560k
2001 Jun 21
0
oops in ext3_new_block / 2.2.19/0.0.7a
Hi,
i am seeing a crash in ext3_new_block quiet often today on 2.2.19 0.0.7a
fsck 1.21
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.2.19. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.2.19/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map-2.2.19 (default)
Warning: You did not tell me where to find symbol information. I will
assume that the log matches the
2001 Jul 29
1
2.2.19/0.0.7a: bonnie -> VM problems
SYSTEM:
rh6x based system, 2.2.19-6.2.7 rh errata kernel + 0.0.7a patch, I rebuilt rpm
for i686; celeron466, 64MB, PIIX4.
root fs is on software raid1 ext2, 6 additional fs's on software raid1 ext2.
There's a 3rd HD, not mirrored, which is mounted ext3.
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
I enabled journal with tune2fs -j with unmounted fs.
The 3 HDs are tuned with
2001 Jun 16
2
Inconsistent ext3fs after crash (2.2.19/0.0.7a)
Hi,
i am seeing something interesting since the upgrade to 2.2.19/0.0.7a - I am
experimenting with the am930 wireless driver and i am crashing on
module exit. Everytime i reboot afterwards the var fs on /dev/hda8
is inconsistent
[...]
Checking all file systems...
Parallelizing fsck version 1.21-WIP (01-Jun-2001)
/dev/hda7: recovering journal
/dev/hda7: clean, 39160/320640 files, 354596/640702