similar to: Please, help with mput/mask!!! Thanks!

Guys, I'm bumping into some stupid problem, really need some fresh ideas. Samba version samba-client-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-swat-2.2.7-3.7.2 samba-common-2.2.7-3.7.2 The goal is to upload all *.gz files only from dir* dirs. I do mask *.gz recurse mput dir* See the detailed output below But mput keeps grabbing non *.gz files ignoring the mask *.gz command. Am I doing

A couple of notes about mget/mput in SFTP (5.1p1). 1. They aren't documented in the SFTP man page 2 They misbehave -- "mput a.txt b.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput *.txt b.txt" copies the first wildcard match to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt b.txt c.txt" copies a.txt to b.txt on the server "mput a.txt

Dear Jeremy. Really appreciate you took your time to answer. I had already reviewed source4/client/client.c looking for mput (cmd_mput) command, but unluckily saying that my C programming skills are poor woud be really overrating them. I'm sorry to disagree for two reasons 1-. It works for mget, true that the source code is completely different. 2-. If taking a look into smbclient man

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 ------- Additional Comments From jason at rndpkt.org 2002-03-28 15:26 ------- mget and mput are just "aliased" commands to get and put, I'm assuming for some kind of compatability. mget and mput expect the get and put parameters and DO NOT function like FTP-based mget and mput (i.e. mget file1 file2.. file#). I'd be happy

Dear folks. Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 distribution is not the most up to date version I should test this on, as it also limits how easy is compiling most recent versions of Samba, but I assume though this is not a tricky test, and should work as documented in both 4.4 and 4.2

Dear all. Confirmed: compilation of 4.12.6 produces same result, mput + recurse ignores mask for files. Will you please tell me if you need further details, or which steps I should follow? Should I file a bug? Many thanks. Best regards. El mar., 25 ago. 2020 a las 9:52, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear Andrew. > > You are right, I should have taken a deeper look

Dear Rowland. So sorry, I did not get the responses to this e-mail address, got them by the purest change googling again. I'm sorry to disagree with your approach: 1-. In my most recent updates you should have seen I am compiling Samba4 from source. Began with packaged distribution, but considering it might be a bug, I decided to test myself. 4 different versions, same behaviour. This means

Dear all. I would like to propose a possible way to make mget and mput behave more or less the same way, rather that just changing documentation. Please, bear in mind this is a poor attempt coming from a person with no C skills at all, so other than testing that only filtered files are transferred, I have not gone further. Hope at least to have been able not to corrupt any pointer, but I'm

Samba 2.0.7 running on Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.0A with latest tru64 patches. "mget *" works OK, "mput *" or something like "mput *.bat" fails with the error message "find: bad option -maxdepth". Several questions - Anyone else come across this one? Would dropping back to 2.0.6 fix the problem? Could it be an issue with 2.0.7 on Tru64 V5? Regards, Brian

Searching the archives I have seen this questions asked 2 times prior with no response. Here's the problem: I am using SMBCLIENT to backup a directory structure to a share on a Windows NT 4 Server. I execute the following commands upon establishing a connection to the NT server: > recurse > prompt > lcd /directory/to/backup > mask * > mput * // I've also tried

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 Summary: Undocumented mget and mput in sftp Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: sftp AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy: Maldoror at

Dear folks. I am using smbclient 4.2.10 version (the one packaged for OEL 6, samba4-client-4.2.10-15.el6.x86_64), and observing a weird behaviour of the tool. I've got a Linux local directorio, say /tmp/eraseme, with a couple of subdirectories in it, say a and b, each one containing a dummy file, say a/AM.xls and b/AT.xls If I run: smbclient -d 30 -l /var/log/samba -m SMB3 -W

Dear fellows. Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V Version 4.9.1 [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -W "${d}" -U "${u}" "${s}" "${p}" Try "help" to get a list of

Dear Andrew. You are right, I should have taken a deeper look into the standard output during compilation. I did just assume source4 was the one for Samba4. Anyway, besides the source confusion (really, even if I had found the right one, following the code would have been out of my reach), I don't seem to find how that is related with the documentation issue, or the mput/mask/recurse

Hi, There is a problem with smbclient mput ( maybe more, I haven't checked ) with the SAMBA CVS I checked out on March 14, 2000. The problem will manifest itself on systems that don't support -maxdepth on the find command. (AIX being one of them ). I compared source/client.c between 2.0.6 and the cvs. The problem is in: static void cmd_mput(void) When recurse=false Version 2.0.6

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181 mouring at eviladmin.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:15:48PM +0200, LPC DPG via samba wrote: > Dear fellows. > > Another piece of information. The issue reprduces on RHEL 7.7, Samba 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient -V > Version 4.9.1 > > [root at vnhprerhds01 ~]# smbclient

I'm running samba 2.0.5a on a Sun Sparc 5 with Solaris 2.6 and trying to use smbclient to copy an entire directory tree to a Windows NT 4.0 box. I'm using the recurse command and can create first level directories but I am unable to create new subdirectories in any of them. For example I created the following directory structure on the Sun: 1 % ls -R .: d1/ d2/ ./d1: f11 f12

A new update. Same behaviour with 4.6.16. Exact issue as Bug 1249. Many thanks. Kind regards. El lun., 24 ago. 2020 a las 12:23, LPC DPG (<lpcdpg at gmail.com>) escribi?: > Dear folks. > > Was hoping it had to do with the release, but have also tested in 4.4.16 > and the issue is also there. I am aware a RHEL/CEntOS based upon 6 > distribution is not the most up to date

My systems: rh61, 2.2.14 + smbfs-nls.patch. I refer to 2.0.7pre3 as 2.0.7 === 1) "ls" of an empty dir 1a) 1.9.18 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls 49550 blocks of size 16384. 33754 blocks available 1b) 2.0.7 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls ERRDOS - ERRbadfile (File not found.) listing \* <=======