similar to: lock/shared file problem

Hello out there, recently I posted a trouble report about my Samba/btrieve experience. I have encountered the worst case scenario - corrupt databases... I had a brief correspondency with Dave Collier-Brown (whose book on Samba can't be praised enough) about this, in which he told me that working under the same login a) network-wide and b) application-wide could lead to such corrpution.

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:06:59AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Going back to the "prioritizing aggregated DBs" thread from > > February 2020, I've got 390 Xapian shards for 130 public inboxes > > I want to search against(*). There's more on the horizon (we're > > expecting tens of thousands of public

?We are trying to migrate a Dos based btrieve application from Windows NT to Samba 4?.1.6-Ubuntu. Running one client works, running more that one client do not work. I searched Google and there are many historic pages about issues related to the btrieve / Samba combination. Are there stable solutions of this issue? Kind Regards Hendre

Hello fellow samba users, I have installed quite a couple of samba fileservers so far. There are exactly two installations which give me real hard time, and both have to do with Win9x clients running applications based on ... *sigh* btrieve. What I do server-sided is switch on opportunistic locking (level2 oplocks = yes). Without this, the applications don't run at all, at least not on more

(resent without HTML) On 07/14/2013 05:56 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > 1c54d77 (x86: partial unification of asm-x86/bitops.h, 2008-01-30) > changed a bunch of btrl/btsl instructions to btr/bts, with the following > justification: > > The inline assembly for the bit operations has been changed to remove > explicit sizing hints on the instructions, so the assembler will

Greetings -- I'm programming a data mining system in R for protein structural data. As a seasoned Perl and Python and Ada and ML, et al., programmer, I am severely befuddled by the environment problem, where data is not found in a 3rd level nested function. I did peruse the parent frame not on the search path idea, and came up with a hack which kinda works, also below with the code which

On 07/14/2013 12:23 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > (resent without HTML) > > On 07/14/2013 05:56 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >> 1c54d77 (x86: partial unification of asm-x86/bitops.h, 2008-01-30) >> changed a bunch of btrl/btsl instructions to btr/bts, with the following >> justification: >> >> The inline assembly for the bit operations has been

Hello there, I have a serious file locking problem with samba on a RH6 based Linux machine. >From the exported share a database files are being requested. Problem is, only one client can access these - and even only one client can initialize the database query engine, which is btrieve 6.15 workstation engine. The same problem affects .doc files. If one client has an open document, the file is

Linus Torvalds wrote: >> btrl $1, 0 >> btr $1, 0 >> btsl $1, 0 >> bts $1, 0 > > What the heck is that supposed to show? I was trying to show a reduced case where gas doesn't complain, but llvm-mc does. Try compiling this with llvm-mc, and you'll get: .text btrl $1, 0 in.s:2:1: error: ambiguous instructions require an

The Wine maintenance release 1.2.1 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Translation updates. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations: http://ibiblio.org/pub/linux/system/emulators/wine/wine-1.2.1.tar.bz2 http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wine/wine-1.2.1.tar.bz2 Binary packages for various distributions will be

1c54d77 (x86: partial unification of asm-x86/bitops.h, 2008-01-30) changed a bunch of btrl/btsl instructions to btr/bts, with the following justification: The inline assembly for the bit operations has been changed to remove explicit sizing hints on the instructions, so the assembler will pick the appropriate instruction forms depending on the architecture and the context. Unfortunately,

Also, please elaborate on why this is a good change. Because gas accepts it isn’t sufficient reason in and of itself. -Jim On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra > <artagnon at gmail.com> wrote: >> The instructions btr and bts are perfectly valid, and have existed since

Jim Grosbach wrote: > That does raise a clarifying question here. Is the code you’re interested in > using Intel or AT&T syntax? > > Also note that the question isn’t whether we should support the btr/bts > instructions. We absolutely must (and do). The question is whether we are > properly handling the un-suffixed mnemonic form of the assembly syntax. > > Perhaps you

http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~baker/devices/lxr/http/source/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h#L68 Here is one example that I found. Are the inline assembly arguments ambiguous in size? -Jevin Sent from my mobile device. Typos are par for the course. On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> wrote: > The instructions btr and bts are perfectly valid, and have existed since > Intel 386. GNU as supports them fine. Unfortunately, LLVM does not > support them, and barfs with: > > error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix > > Fix this problem by disambiguating it

Hallo, linux-btrfs, I''ve (once again) tried "add" and "delete". First, with 3 devices (partitions): mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdl1 /dev/sdm1 Mounted (to /mnt/btr), filled with about 100 GByte data. Then btrfs device add /dev/sdj1 /mnt/btr results in # show Label: none uuid: 6bd7d4df-e133-47d1-9b19-3c7565428770 Total devices 4 FS bytes

A problem has arisen with the way samba handles file creation dates compared to NT/win2k, which prevents xcopy /d from working correctly. On NT/Win2k, files copied from another NT machine using xcopy end up with the modified dates equal to the original modified date of the file, and the created and accessed dates become the date of the xcopy operation. On Samba, files copied from an NT

The Wine maintenance release 1.2.2 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - Support for animated cursors. - Translation updates. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations: http://ibiblio.org/pub/linux/system/emulators/wine/wine-1.2.2.tar.bz2 http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wine/wine-1.2.2.tar.bz2 Binary packages

Stephen Checkoway wrote: > [...] Thanks for the absolutely splendid analysis! > For the memory, immediate form without the suffix, it seems like the options are > 1. If the immediate value is in [0,15], use btsl/btrl since it saves a byte, otherwise error; > 2. Follow both gas's behavior and the Solaris assembler manual Jim Grosbach linked to which stated that unsuffixed

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> wrote: > Jim Grosbach wrote: >> To say that another way, is the assembler correctly diagnosing a previously >> unnoticed problem in the project source code, or is the assembler not >> behaving correctly according the the documented Intel assembly mnemonics? > > Where are the authoritative