similar to: Samba4 configuration

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38992 Summary: GeForce 9500 GT: starts only with nouveau.noaccel=1 Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

I have a new Dell PowerEdge 2950 running CentOS 5.0 out-of-box and a Dell MD3000i. I am new to iscsi and, with google and included documentation, am having a heck of a time trying to get the RAID volumes I have created on the 3000i to be seen by the OS as usuable drives. I have printed out SMcli and iscsiadm documentation. I have asked on the linux-poweredge at dell.com site, too. Many

No, I just think 15 years or so is more than enough time to have addressed the issue. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 14:05:08 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > So, this isn't your problem and you don't respect the people's whose > problem it is. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:18

HD Moore from MetaSploit has noted that, given a pubkey (and not the corresponding private key, as might be found in authorized_keys), he can determine if he'd be able to log into an account. It's a small thing, but he's using it for very interesting recon/deanonymization. He'll be releasing a paper shortly, not overplaying the characteristic, but certainly showing it can be used

Sorry if this is an obvious question, but I haven't seen an obvious answer on the wiki that I remember. Has anyone managed to make the record button on the snom 360 fire off the Monitor() application? I don't see a bounty, and googling for "snom 360 record button asterisk" returns tons of product specification pages. (Joy!) I don't see a bounty for it, and the only

Protocols and ciphers are sunsetted all the time, this is a regular thing, but there are announcements before breaking changes are inserted. You assume people are slow to update anyway; some are, some aren't, what you're doing is wildly rewarding the slow updaters and punishing the fast ones. That has negative effects elsewhere. What would it hurt to announce the release in 3-6 months

On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > Hmm. Feels a little aggressive for ssh client. Support heartily for sshd. People who need it can build their own, or OS vendors might supply a non-default v.1 capable client binary themselves. IMO it's time to apply some selection pressure to a protocol that can't be secured. -d

Am Di, 20. Feb 2018, 23:13:16 -0800 schrieb Dan Kaminsky: > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:13:16 -0800 > From: Dan Kaminsky <dan at doxpara.com> > To: J? Fahlke <jorrit at jorrit.de> > Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: Re: Is there socksify script for dynamics forwardings to unix > domain sockets? > > Whoa. That's pretty cool. > >

Mike Stump <mrs at apple.com> writes: > On Oct 23, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >> Now tblgen.exe builds fine with my CMake build system. Guess it is >> the same case for the VC++ project files. > > Oh, does clang building work with CMake? If not, wanna cons it > up? :-) Thanks. Giving a compelling reason why you'll like to build clang using

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:18 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > You're right. My argument the is the next build of OpenSSH should be > OpenSSH 7, and the one after that 8, then 9, then 10. No minor releases? > Sure, go ahead. Deprecate the point, > > Do you manage any machines running SSHv1? > If by "running" you mean accepting SSH1, of course not. From a

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:19:05 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > Communication is a two way street. If OpenSSH wants to go down the route > of single releases, like the browsers did, it can remove its minor numbers, > like the browsers did. > There's no question of "going down the route." This has been the practice with OpenSSH for many years -- if not from the beginning.

Hi everyone I have one final question regarding my diploma work. As it seems, the hardware performance seems not to be the bottleneck when streaming out ONE stream to x clients. What happens when I use instead of ONE stream different streams, because my concept is an on-demand radio station that basically provides everyone with access to a huge library of music files and lets him create

Hello all, scp does not preserve links (neither soft neither hard) It is a problem with recursive option (-r) when you met some links like Openssh -> . In 2.3.0p1 it failled because of too long argument. Also I upgrade (my client an HPUX-11.0 and my server an redhat-6,2 x86) openssh to the last release 2.9p2. But this release create in a loop (i presume until fs full) subdirectories

We are using openssh with backup software to transport data back and force between clients and backup server. Common sense and some testing suggest that the data transfer rate is significantly slower when the ssh native encryption is used. For the backup applications it's probably OK to use ssh without encryption. Unfortunately, it looks like the recent versions including 3.0.2p1 do not

Hello, I'm trying to find very indepth documentation of OpenSSH, so far I have found nothing of much use, if anyone could direct me to some advance texts on openssh it would be greatly appreciated.

Do we have any solid guidance how to do safe, anonymous, SFTP? Even with a dedicated shell, port forwarding creates open proxies (which I know can be disabled, but still).

That's a good point. DHCP allows you to set DNS search parameters. So as long as each location sets different search, "ssh fishbowl" will in fact resolve to the proper local FQDN. On Monday, December 22, 2014, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:26 AM, martin f krafft <madduck at madduck.net > <javascript:;>> wrote:

Hi, I was wondering if the paravirt patches is actually usuable with Xen yet. Thanks chuck

Hi, I was wondering if the paravirt patches is actually usuable with Xen yet. Thanks chuck

On Friday 24 October 2008, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Apart from me, I only know of one person that tried CMake, and it was by > accident. Well I tried it on linux, and it sounds like it worked. Well llvm was build without error, but since I prefer to stick to released llvm, I didn't if the results of the compilation was usuable ;) -- Cyrille Berger