similar to: Samba ADS: kerberos logins seems to give users different rights/group memberships

hi list, we recently saw the following weird behaviour on samba v3.0.13 with MacOSX panther and tiger as clients --setup-- [share1] path = /data valid users = @admins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode = 770 force directory mode = 2770 [share2] path = /data/folder valid users = @noadmins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode

Hello, I've found this in the newsgroup and it works fine with the inherit owner option. The user is not able to delete the files he has created. Se below. But my problem is that this doesn't work if you create a new folder and the new create files in this new folder. Any ideas how I can get the users to not delete the folder an the files under the folder? Thank's a lot. On Tuesday

Hi, All, I'm having a problem with my samba server(v3.6.9) setup. I have a share on the server: #cd / #mkdir managment #chown -R root:managegroup management #chowm -R 2770 management When I test this I found out: the managegroup member can create new file/dir with the correct permission: -rwxrws--- or drwxrws--- BUT, when the client copy a file or dir to the share from his local drive,

Hi, When I excecute the following command line wine --winver nt40 --dll shlwapi=b --managed -- /nfs2/bin/Xilinx/ise4.1i/bin/nt/par.exe -pl 5 -rl 5 -e 1 -t 1 -w /tmp/design.ncd design.ncd design.pcf the following error message is returned err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Unhandled exception code c0000005 flags 0 addr 0x400a5648 but if I run the following command line wine --winver nt40 --dll

Hi all I have another GLIM question. I have been using R as well as Genstat (version 6) in order to fit GLIM models to the data (displayed below). The same models are fitted but the answers supplied by the two packages are not the same. Why? Can anyone help? A discription of the data and the type of model/s fitted can be found below. Regards Allan The

I am migrating a couple old RH servers running sendmail and UW-IMAP to a new Ubuntu 10.04 servers running Postfix and Dovecot. I have everything working reasonably well except that the permissions of newly created mbox mail folders is always 600. I have reviewed the archives, google, and double checked everything is as suggested in the Dovecot Wiki / SharedMailboxes / Permissions. I am

On 2017-11-10 07:47, Nemanja Ivanovic wrote: > One thing I thought about doing a while back and never really wrote a > POC for is the following: > - Make FirstCSRCost a property of the MachineBasicBlock (or create a > map of MBB* -> FirstCSRCost) > > - Implement a pre-RA pass that will populate the map as follows: > > - Identify all blocks with calls > > -

Hi, Suppose I use the following codes to read in a data set. ############################################### > rating <- scan("../Data/Rating.csv", + what = list( + usage = "", + mileage = 0, + sex = "", + excess = "", + ncd = "", +

On 2017-11-14 17:22, Quentin Colombet wrote: > Hi, > > I think it is kind of artificial to tie the CSRCost with the presence > of calls. > I think I’ve already mentioned it in one of the review, but I > believe it would be better to differentiate when we want to use a CSR > to avoid spilling or to avoid splitting. CSR instead of spilling is > good, CSR instead of

Hi, I am a newbie and I have installed Wine release 20000909 on a machine running Mandrake7.2 and win2000. The DefaultLoadOrder for the DLLs are builtin, so, native & elfdll. LD_LIBRARY_PATH and EXTRA_LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to the directory containing the lib*.so files. I encontered the following errors while running a place & route tool.

On 2017-11-17 13:10, Quentin Colombet wrote: >> On Nov 16, 2017, at 2:31 PM, junbuml at codeaurora.org wrote: >> On 2017-11-14 17:22, Quentin Colombet wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I think it is kind of artificial to tie the CSRCost with the >>> presence >>> of calls. >>> I think I’ve already mentioned it in one of the review, but I

Hi I'm having major problems setting up Samba 3.0.9 with kerberos authentication. I have also tried with 3.0.8(from Debian SID) with same result. smb.conf[1] has 'security = ads' , and 'use kerberos keytab = yes'. I have set up pam_krb5 and I get TGTs that works with my ssh servers. But, when I try to authenticate using smbclient -k -L server I get: "session setup failed:

Hi all, our setup is Samba 3.3 in W2K8 domain. It seems samba cache group memberships somewhere and after adding user to a new group it's necessary to relogin for that user to get new memberships. Is it possible to eliminate that nasty procedure? Thanks. -- Vladimir Vassiliev

Hi, This may actually be a theoretical question. When I tried to do the following: ########################################################## > colnames(rating.adclms) [1] "usage" "mileage" "sex" "excess" "ncd" [6] "primage" "minage" "drivers" "district" "cargroup" [11]

I thought this was true, but In troubleshooting a permissions related issue, I see evidence that it is not. In my previous post, I was asking for assistance in trying to figure out why I was unable to create files/folders over the network, but could so so locally. My Active Directory account is a member of group that have full control of a particular folder according to getfacl. I added that

Hi all, Running samba 3.5.5 in a Solaris non-global zone. I have created a folder (StudentJobApplications) on a share which I want to make accessible only to members of a Unix group (studempl). I have added myself to the group but when I or other group members try to access the folder via Windows Explorer I get the following: I:\StudentJobApplications is not accessible Access is denied Here

I haven't had a chance to look at the list very carefully for the past few weeks, so I apologize in advance if I'm asking a question that has recently been discussed. I seem to recall there has been some discussion about a similar situation to the one I am in. My situation is that I am having an issue with READ ONLY files -- and seeing very different behavior with Samba 3.0.20b

Hi, I'm running Samba Active Directory 4.16.9 with packages from Sernet. Domain members are Linux servers (Ubuntu 20.04, RHEL 8) with Sernet Samba 4.16.x. I'm getting crazy with group memberships syncing from AD to Linux members. It is completely random as when changes in AD group are visible in Linux OS (or more precise: winbind), it might take minutes, hours or days as when these

Hello everyone. I am using Samba 2.0.7 on a RedHat 6.2 machine. I wanted to apply a directory mask of 2770 to everything created in a share. The root directory of this share already has these permissions. I want to have it so that everything created in a certain directory has the permissions of the group of the creator. As it stands, I do have the directory mask = 2770 line in the smb.conf

Hello. I'm using Version 4.0.8-SerNet-Ubuntu-5.precise (Also, a heads up on this release; the folder /var/run/samba must be created upon reboot. When starting Samba I get this error: ERROR: can't open /var/run/samba/samba.pid: Error was No such file or directory) So anyway, when trying to do a classic upgrade/migration in order to preserve authentication information on a new domain. After