similar to: Re: Re: Here [Authorize]

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. See http://www.silvervalley.k12.ca.us/index.php/195 for more details. This isn't spam? Please forward this message to postmaster@silvervalley.k12.ca.us with a request that the e-mail address you received this from be whitelisted. Content preview: Hi! Anyone know

************* eManager Notification ************** Recipient, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. Destination mailbox(es): "samba@samba.org" ******************* End of message ******************* -------------- next part -------------- Received: from 208.8.92.167 by jupiter.INSIDEAI.COM (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:55:27 -0400 Received: from

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.montanhydraulik.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster for details. Content preview: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Spam detection software, running on the system "mix.hive.no", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I recently found a .. weird bug on Win32 SSE with GCC

I have had the same email address since 1997 (when microsoft stole bob.com from me thanks to network solutions...) In the early days I of course was free with my email and used it everwhere. Fast forward to 2012, some 15 years later. woof..the amount of spam sent to me has always just kept getting worse and worse. On my centos 5 server I just used sendmail with spamassassin and it killed a

Seems we got a release candidate today. http://homepage3.nifty.com/blacksword/ And oh yeah, thanks for blocking me from participation on this list: " SMTP error from remote mailer after initial connection: host smtp.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]: 550 Service unavailable; Client host [217.209.222.131] blocked using dynablock.njabl.org; Dynamic/Residential IP range listed by NJABL

This really has me stumped and desperate. I upgraded Debian from 5 to 6 (squeeze) and now Dovecot LDA fails. I have checked permissions and the usual. Postfix SMTP, Dovecot POP3 and Dovecot IMAP work. Having to upgrade MySQL from 5.0 to 5.1 made me question that. Logging is of little help. I have turned on logging for LDA to a separate file. When I try to run the deliver command it returns

Hello, njab.org will discontinue blacklist services. On 1. March 2013 Apache published: Bug 6913; Disabled rules/scores for njabl.org See: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1451776 Will there be an update from CentOS? Best regards Helmut Drodofsky -- Viele Gr??e Helmut Drodofsky Internet XS Service GmbH He?br?hlstra?e 15 70565 Stuttgart Gesch?ftsf?hrung

Howdy, [Please preserve the CC to 424919-forwarded at bugs.debian.org on any replies.] The following bug in Markdown was reported to the Debian bug tracking system. In short, running both the released version of Markdown and the latest beta on * foo > bar > baz produces invalid HTML. ----- Forwarded message from Joey Hess <joeyh at debian.org> ----- From: Joey Hess <joeyh

I have enabled the feature in sendmail.mc to check with spamhaus for spammers. However since this block is being made at MTA level, I would like to know is something can be done to obtain statistics of blocked attemps. thanks -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama,

If you are using this DNSBL in your MTA, best remove it, it's no more. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 490 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20130302/3213e6fe/attachment.bin>

Dear Friend, I done configuration using RBLSMTPD with WHITELIST, but I don't know it is correct. Please check files below are corrects. Thanks Adriano === FILE WHITELIST.DOMINIO.RBL. ==== $ttl 900 whitelist.dominio.rbl. IN SOA host1.xxxxxx.com. root.xxxxx.com. ( 2006112002 ; serial; 3600 ; refresh period (1 hora); 900 ; retry time (15 minutos); 1800 ; expire tiem (30 minutos); 900 ;

Hello again, Jeremy, first of all, I am terribly sorry for my late reply. I tried to send my posting many times, but my mail has always been silently discarded by the Samba mail servers due to my main mail provider (GMX - a very large German mail provider with millions of customers) having been blacklisted by SORBS. For the time being, SORBS is still unwilling to delist them for unknown

Hi everybody, I am trying to work with quota. I use postfix and dovecot with a sql backend. Below you'll find my configuration. Everything works except for the quota part. It doesn't seem to see the quota and doesn't respond to the sender that the client is over its quota. versions: postfix-2.5.20070531-mysql dovecot-1.0.2-mysql Thanks for the help in advance. My Settings: #

Hi Nitesh, check out my config that I have for the Faktortel config in the asterisk@home sourceforge forum, you'll probably be able to work out how to set it up from there. Cheers, Dean -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Nitesh Divecha Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:12 PM To:

make install in the klibc directory ends up doing include /.*.d which just happens to pick up root's .emacs.d directory on my machine which makes make barf (because its a directory). This patch makes sure that when DIR is not set we don't go poking around in /. Thanks, -Jim PS This message was initially bounced by (via SORBS) because my IP address is dynamic (it may technically

On Sun 21 Mar 2004 - 02:58:46 EST - James Couzens wrote: > Mail coming from motherfish-II.xiph.org is likely getting dropped due to > the following (which I pulled out of the headers of a piece of mail > after wondering where all my speex email suddenly disappeared off to: > > 2.8 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server - > [198.136.36.245 listed in

Hi list, I have noted over the last week or so my DNS servers are dumping lots of messages for bogus domain lookups. Examining the postfix queue with postqueue -p: I see many (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com type=MX: Host not found, try again) Jake at bdgiedjhea.po6e4ina.com My question - why does this