similar to: Re: ext3 partition unmountable

Hi, One of my shared volumes crashed the other day on a RH-7.2, 2.4.9-31 system. These are the first errors in the log: kernel: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,9)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #2424833: rec_len is smaller than minimal - offset=0, inode=2553887680, rec_len=0, name_len=0 kernel: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,9)): ext3_readdir: bad entry in directory #2424833: rec_len is

If I have an image of a filesystem taken with dd, I can look at it with a hex editor and discover that an ext2/3 superblock is at offset 1024 and I can figure out a lot of info about it. I cannot figure out, however, how the superblock differs from ext2 in ext3. I can't tell them apart... the "magic number" is the same as well as the "revision" field. If I have such an

Hi folks, For unknown cause I encounter following mounting problem; # /mnt/hda8 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda8, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so # dmesg | tail via82cxxx: timeout while reading AC97 codec (0x9A0000) via82cxxx: timeout while reading AC97 codec (0x9A0000)

Just a positive experience I would like to share with you : testing is great on paper but very tedious to apply because nobody wants to run manually the tests by hand. Last week I have discovered zentest, an automated test process command line utility. That was at the beginning (hopefully) of a new project. Believe it or not, I have started to code most parts of the application without using

Guys, The other day while working on my old workstation it get frozen and after reboot I lost almost all data unexpectedly. I have a RAID1 configuration with LVM. 2 IDE HDDs. md0 .. store /boot (100MB) -------------------------- /dev/hda2 /dev/hdd1 md1 .. store / (26GB) /dev/hda3 /dev/hdd2 The only info that still rest in was that, that I restore after the fresh install. It seems that the

Guys, The other day while working on my old workstation it got frozen and after reboot I lost almost all data unexpectedly. I have a RAID1 configuration with LVM. 2 IDE HDDs. md0 .. store /boot (100MB) -------------------------- /dev/hda2 /dev/hdd1 md1 .. store / (26GB) -------------------------- /dev/hda3 /dev/hdd2 The only info that still rest in was that, that I restore after the fresh

hi Is there a way to eaisly upgrade rails to the most recent version? thanks Scott -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all, I've been wrestling with a problem with drdb and centos. I have successfully created one drbd resource, but when I try the create a 2nd, I get an error on one of the nodes: Lower device is already mounted. Command 'drbdsetup /dev/drbd1 disk /dev/hdd1 internal -1' terminated with exit code 20 The partition is not mounted from fstab etc and is newly created with parted after

Greetings, I have a 500Gig hdd with and XFS filesystem created by openfiler (which strangely switched from lovely CentOS for reasons best known to them). I fired up a Centos box with this hdd. I then did yum install kmod-xfs.i686 xfsdump.i386 dmapi xfsprogs and it wnt through. But when I try to mount this volume mount -t xfs /dev/hdd1 /mnt/test I get the error: mount: /dev/hdd1 already

Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 11:32 schrieb Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>: > On 03.08.2016 21:17, Jonatan Schlag wrote: >> Hi, >> I have a very strange problem with libvirt. I work on some machines >> with >> libvirt (Debian/ Arch Linux) and libvirt set the ownership of images >> file automatically to the qemu user / group for example on Arch

Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 1:38 schrieb Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>: > On 04.08.2016 12:12, Jonatan Schlag wrote: >> >> >> Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 11:32 schrieb Michal Privoznik >> <mprivozn@redhat.com>: >>> On 03.08.2016 21:17, Jonatan Schlag wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> I have a very strange problem with libvirt. I

Hi, I have a very strange problem with libvirt. I work on some machines with libvirt (Debian/ Arch Linux) and libvirt set the ownership of images file automatically to the qemu user / group for example on Arch Linux to nobody:kvm. So when I copy an image file with root and use I then with qemu, libvirt change the owner/ group to nobody:kvm. But I also compiled libvirt for a machine (gcc 4.9.4

Hi, We will have to go and use SuSE (30 servers) just because ext3 filesystem cannot be increase while the filesystem is mounted. I Don't understand why RedHat do not support filesystems that can do thing that ext3 cannot do. When is RedHat going to understand that in a production environnement (30 servers that is seems will be SuSE) we need extend filesystem online. IBM JS,

HI, I am trying to find out why an old slower machineis faster than a new faster machine. I have a RedHat 6.2 server installation, it runs samba and I have been very happy with it. Filesystem is:- [darryl@keg darryl]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda6 1.2G 735M 387M 66% / /dev/hda1 40M 3.0M 35M 8% /boot /dev/hdc1

Ok, this is the case: I've got two raid-5 arrays with software raid, both with three disks. Setup: md0 has hdb2, hdd1 and sda1 md1 has hdb5, hdd3 and sda3 Tonight, the system lost power due to a power spike. The result was a reboot where it attempted to fix the raid, but it didn't exactly work. I have now booted a live CD and using utilities there. It seems the checksum value is

first time poster here - hello everyone I started out with CentOS x86 5.3 with the following partitions on my source hard drive: /dev/hdc1 swap /dev/hdc2 / I did the following to migrate my CentOS box to the destination hard drive: 1. boot up with CentOS 5.3 livecd in rescue mode 2. partition destination hard drive (/dev/hdd) /dev/hdd1 swap /dev/hdd2 / 3. create the

Hello everyone! I have to implement the functionality of mounting all VM disks/partitions. E.g. if a VM has 2 disks of 2 partitions each (I get it from virt-filesystems), I want to get the following structure on host node after mount: mnt/ ------hdd0/ -------------volume1/ -------------volume2/ ------hdd1/ -------------volume1/ -------------volume2/ I'd like to use guestmount due to

Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 5:07 schrieb Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>: > On 04.08.2016 13:59, Jonatan Schlag wrote: >> >> >> Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 1:38 schrieb Michal Privoznik >> <mprivozn@redhat.com>: >>> On 04.08.2016 12:12, Jonatan Schlag wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 11:32

Hello! I've followed your tutorial to change the IP Address of our Samba AD DC: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_IP_Address_of_a_Samba_AD_DC But the samba_dnsupdate tool always crashes with this output: samba_dnsupdate --verbose Unknown parameter encountered: "ks" Ignoring unknown parameter "ks" IPs: ['192.168.68.201'] Looking for DNS entry A

hi all, A very Happy and Prosperous New Year to all of you!! i want to create a server that will ext3 file system, but at the same time i want to make the file system unmountable, when the HDD is attached as slave/secondary. Can it be done in any way with ext3. any ideas or alternatives?? thanks in advance tanmay __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Find out what made the Top