Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "NT4 Migration -> Samba 3.0.2a + LDAP"
2003 Nov 23
2
Samba with Posix ACL support
Hi!
Has anyone got any "success story" or any good advice of using Posix ACLs
(or Enhanced Attributes) with Samba? I'm using Debian woody with 2.4.22
linux, ext3fs and Samba 3.
--
Pirkka
2003 Nov 28
1
ACL Security-tab missing users and groups
Hi!
I'm using Samba 3.0 pdc with Debian Woody, LDAP and ACL-support. ACL works
great, but if I try to ADD an acl-permission via windows security-tab there
is none to choose from. It shows that my domain is selected and there are
some basic users (Everyone, Authenticated users, CREATOR-OWNER etc.) that
can be chosen, but no users or groups of mine.
Is this by design or am I missing
2004 Mar 17
1
scandinavian letters or charset problem?
Hi!
This teamware mailclient (teamware.com) that we use at the office has
problems adding files as attachments from our Samba 3.0.2a share. The
attachment file browser sees the files but fails to add them as
attachments (with an error message: "valid.stf - file not found"
regardless of the file name in question). I tracked this thing down to
scandinavian letters (if your mail
2003 Nov 18
3
Fwd: Re: smbpasswd fails to add machine account with ldapsam
,--------------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht (Anfang)
Betreff: Re: [Samba] smbpasswd fails to add machine account with ldapsam
Absender: Christoph Rudorff
Datum: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:58:19 +0100
Newsgruppe: linux.samba
Pirkka Luukkonen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am seeing other users with the same problem as I have.
confirmed.
> My samba also fails to add machine accounts.
2004 Sep 05
1
Segfault in Samba
Hi!
My Samba setup broke after upgrading Samba from 3.0.5-1 to 3.0.6-3 using
Debian apt-get upgrade. It seems to me, that the problems lies within
winbind. Any help would be appreciated!
--
Pirkka
> The Samba 'panic action' script, /usr/share/samba/panic-action,
> was called for pid 8012 (/usr/sbin/smbd).
>
> Below is a backtrace for this process generated with gdb, which
2003 Nov 17
1
smbpasswd fails to add machine account with ldapsam
Hi!
I am seeing other users with the same problem as I have. My samba also fails
to add machine accounts. It seems to me if it didn't even try. If I use some
other script (pdbedit, smbldap-tools) than smbpasswd it manages to add the
account but still fails to authenticate within the same session. If I try
again the machine account exists and authentication goes ok.
server:~# smbpasswd -a -m
2005 Aug 14
5
SIDs and UIDs and RIDs - Oh My!
I'm trying to grasp pg. 154 of the "Official SAMBA-3" book by Terpstra and
Vernooij and I'm just missing a critical networking concept.
I understand that SIDs are the numerical identification of a user for the
Windows world.
I understand that UIDs are the equivalent for the *nix world.
But what the @$@! is a Relative IDentifier (RID)?!?
On page 153 the command to map a
2004 Mar 16
2
matching UIDs to RIDs when converting from Windows to Samba
I have a bunch of Windows users using a Win2k server as a PDC. I want
to move all the server functions to a Samba server without disturbing
the users in any way. The client machines are all Win2k, using local
profiles.
Samba insists on algorithmicly generating the RID from the UID, so the
Windows user, after migration, gets a new SID and loses contact with
their local profile. In fact, they
2004 Feb 28
1
Possible bug with ACL handling after NT user migration
Hi *
I encounter severe problems with changing ACL settings in Samba
3.0.2a after migrating users from NT PDC to LDAP-SAM.
I did not find anything about this in the mailing list yet.
However, I have no idea (if) what I am doing wrong here.
Although I can hardly believe that I am the first one to trigger
that bug, it looks like a problem with the sid_to_gid routine.
So please take a look at that:
2005 May 20
2
Non-algorithmic RIDs
When I set up my initial users for the Samba domain i did not realize that
RIDs were supposed to be dynamic. I was creating the user as a posixAccount
in LDAP, and then adding the Samba elements via a script that I wrote.
Their RIDs are the same as their UID. For instance if I have a user with
uidNumber 1036, her SID would be <domain-SID>-1036. This is fine except for
idmapping for
2010 Dec 29
1
confusion about using samba as NT4 PDC with ldapsam backend
Hello,
I want to use samba v3.3.x to implement an NT4/Win2k style domain:
a samba PDC and a samba BDC, using ldapsam for the 'passdb backend'. I plan
to use RedHat Directory Server v8.2 as the ldap server.
I'm trying to sort out how user/group management and nss will work.
I'm confused about how/when the samba-supplied ldap schema is used (I mean
the schema that's in the
2011 Sep 05
3
rid generation questions
Hello list,
I have a few questions to ask... I am about to migrate from Samba 2 to 3 (3.5.9). I am going to use LDAP as backend in the future and came across something I don't understand. As far as I know the 'old' way to generate RIDs for users is to take their uidnumber, multiply it by two and add 1000. For computer accounts it would be 1001 instead of 1000. I am now trying to
2016 Nov 29
4
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 14:03 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:22:00 +0100
> "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > NT4-PDC:
> >
> > # net groupmap list
> > Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2940660672-4062535256-4144655499-513) ->
> > users
> > Domain-Admins
2004 Mar 25
2
Any plans to fix Bug 1139 in 3.0.3?
I was wondering if anyone knows if there are any plans to fix Bug #1139
(reproduced below) in version 3.0.3. I haven't tried 3.0.3pre1 yet, but
from what I read of the changes it doesn't look like this bug has been
addressed.
Is there some other work around? This bug is quite annoying as some of
our users/administrators would like to use Windows to modify ACLs and we
recently
2006 Oct 04
1
problems adding a computer to LDAP domain in 3.0.23c
Hi,
In 3.0.23 and 3.0.23c in our domain controlled by samba with an
ldapsam backend when I try to add a machine to the domain I now get this
message:
[2006/10/04 12:08:03, 0] passdb/pdb_interface.c:pdb_new_rid(1067)
'algorithmic rid base' is set but a passdb backend without algorithmic
RIDs is chosen.
Please map all used groups using 'net groupmap add', set the maximum
2002 Aug 15
1
rid and uid on ldap pdc
Is the rid of a user required to be 2*uid+1000 in HEAD when using an ldap
backend? Is it still necessary that users also exist in /etc/passwd? I'd
like to replace NIS and win NT domain auth with ldap, and want to keep the
current unix uid's and the NT rid's, so the migration is transparent to the
end users.
-david
2016 Nov 28
2
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
Am 2016-11-28 um 15:03 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:22:00 +0100
> "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> NT4-PDC:
>>
>> # net groupmap list
>> Domain Users (S-1-5-21-2940660672-4062535256-4144655499-513) -> users
>> Domain-Admins
2018 Nov 01
2
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
Hello,
sorry, but I cannot find start of this discussion thread, so my question may be stupid.
Is your domain classicupgraded from Samba 3 or provisioned from scratch?
I have similar problem with our domain which is upgraded. If I provision the new domain everything works, but in old domain there is something broken inside.
For Rowland:
Does exist utility with similar function as "net rpc
2012 Jun 25
1
winbind AD nested group issues
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6083 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20120625/569cea1a/attachment.bin>
2006 Jun 19
1
Mommy, where do RIDs come from?
Hey everyone,
I'm preparing for a transition in which I'll be moving
everything (PDC, WINS server, big file shares) off an old
Linux server running Samba 2.2.7 onto a much newer Linux system
running Samba 3.0.22.
In the process, I'll be switching from smbpasswd (only thing
supported under Samba 2.x, if I understand correctly) to
ldapsam on Samba 3.x.
I want to keep the same domain