similar to: More Info: Mac permission problems after Debian update

Hi, we have a strange samba locking problem with version 3.0. Sometimes user only get a read only access to files. This happens with different users on different clients. Unix permissions are OK. I have realy no idea. Can you help ? Thanx Peter Huber -------------- next part -------------- [2004/03/02 15:03:56, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(217) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0)

Redhat 6.2 kernel 2.2.14-12 Samba 3.0.6 compiled with ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba --localstatedir=/var/log/samba --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/rc-abas.d --with-configdir=/etc/rc-abas.d --enable-debug I can list directories and write files on a samba share but cannot read files. This happens with Windows XP client or smbclient. After downgrading to 3.0.5 samba

Prior to upgrading from RH7.0 to RH7.3 our Samba filserver worked perfectly. Now we are having locking problems. Initially Iused the same samba binaries built on RH70, I tried rebuilding Samba and reinstalling but it had no effect. If user bon opens an M$-Office file they frequently get a 'file is already in use by bob'. Sure enough smbstatus -L shows the file locked by bob, but bob

Hi all, I've got kind of strange setup, wherein all of my data is on a big NFS server (RH linux 8.0 running the 2.4.18 kernel and nfs-utils 1.0.1-2.80) and my Samba 3.0.0 PDC server (RH linux 7.3 w/ 2.4.18 kernel, nfs-utils 0.3.3-6.73) mounts the NFS export with the following options: rw,vers=3,wsize=8192,rsize=8192,hard,intr This mounted partition is then re-exported to the windows users

Debian Woody with security updates Linux kernel 2.2.25 Samba 3.0.0 libc6 2.2.5 The problem I have is with a windows application that uses samba. This application is crucial for the organization, so if this is not fixed, and soon, we will have to ditch Samba and move to a windows server. I *really* don't want to do this, as Samba has been working so well for years now and billg is rich enough

This was in regards to a problem with ms applications hanging on trying to open a file. Turns out it was an nfs locking issue. Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Partenheimer Nate [mailto:npartenh@butler.edu] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 1:23 PM To: "MCCALLDON "@envelope.hp.com; HP-USA@envelope.hp.com; ex1 " Subject: RE: RE: Explorer & MS Office hang

Hello, Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe solaris I went into tests folder and tried summary.c. It fails with the above error. I tried to make the fcntl_lock manually like it tries and got the following: root@raven:/usr/local/samba/source/tests #gcc -m32 -o fcntl_lock fcntl_lock.c fcntl_lock.c: In function `main':

The Samba 3.0.5rc1 server is configured as a PDC. [global] # client code page = 866 # NetBIOS name of that comp netbios name = TOLTEC #Name of Domain workgroup = liin #Comment server string = Samba PDC %v #Interface where samba works interfaces = 10.0.0.4/24 127.0.0.1/24 bind interfaces only = yes hosts allow = 10.0.0. name resolve

I think that is fair to say about my old accounts where names and IDs do not match. But the crazy thing is it is those accounts which work fine and it is the new accounts where I did make the names and IDs match where things do not work! I am still confused about the supplemental groups thing. Are you saying Samba will not support a mode where 'security = ads' for authentication against

When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1 localhost

Hi all, I use this command on my servers to test locally that Samba is alive and well: smbcontrol smbd ping However, it suddenly stop working on one of the several identical servers, and I cannot figure out why. ping command says "no replies received", while log.smbd says that it received a ping message, but cannot reply because permission is denied. Which permission? $ sudo

from the man page. I've never tried veto oplocks. But it looks like something that might be useful... > veto oplock files (S) > > This parameter is only valid when the oplocks parameter is turned > on for a share. It allows the Samba administrator to selectively > turn off the granting of oplocks on selected files that match a >

Hi, I've a really big problem with my SAMBA 4.1.11 production server.... it doesn't want to start smbd anymore.... nmbd starts fine but not smbd. I've tried to start smbd in interactive mode to see what's happened : # /srv/progs/samba4/sbin/smbd -i -d9 produce a lot of lines about configuration (all fine), some last lines are : added interface lo ip=::1

Hi all,. I'm getting this:- [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1274) fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 8] lib/util.c:(1314) fcntl_lock: Lock call successful [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:(475) tdb((NULL)): tdb_brlock failed (fd=7) at offset 4 rw_type=2 lck_type=6 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 5] smbd/connection.c:(156) claiming 0 [2002/03/08 10:26:28, 0]

-----Original Message----- From: MAKRO BAGAFORO, Melvin Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:52 AM To: 'Ben Elliston' Subject: RE: samba error Hi Guys, I already downloaded the latest config.guess and config.sub files, './configure' command is now error free. However, I have another problem, samba won't start. Samba test results:

Jim@Morris.net wrote: > I have finally tracked down the reason I am experiencing problems with > DBase files on Samba file servers - initially Redhat 6, and now on > Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 as well. Great debugging work ! > The DOS client code uses a DBase library called CodeBase to access the > DBase files. When a record is appended to a file, the underlying C > code does the

Hello, I believe that I have found a bug in the 2.0.5a configure process. If the source tarball is extracted to an automounted directory, and you run configure, it will fail the fcntl_lock test, resulting in this message at the end of the configure process: WARNING: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe To verify that the automounted directory is the problem, I put an "exit

Hi All, I am having a problem with Samba that seems to be a bug. I say this because I read the archives and they described a problem similar to mine and were told that it was a bug in older version of Samba and the latest version should have it fixed. I am running what is essentially a RH 7.3 on a 1.4GHz Athon with 1GB or RAM. I compiled Samba 2.2.5 in /opt/samba-2.2.5 and am using the following

Hello list, I've got a problem concerning locking of files with a share on a nfs mounted NAS. samba server is 2.2.8a installed from SuSE-RPMs the NAS is mounted with following line in fstab: <IP-Number>:/vgroup00/data02/data /mnt/nas01 nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,soft 0 0 I tried to save a file from word which lead to a aprox. 1 minute hang of my Win2k/SP3. The log of the

Sorry if this issue has come up before. I have been using samba on a NetApp filer successfully for some time but I recently upgraded my samba server to Suse 9.0 Professional. I am trying to use the 'classic samba' version (since I don't know any better) and am having problems with file locking on my shares. Here is a transcript of the log.smbd that shows some incompatibility between