similar to: ext3 problem on recover...

Hi there, I'm new to ext3, so I hope you won't find my question to be stupid. I also hope this isn't the 1,000,000th time someone posts it. My problem is the following: I converted my ext2 systems to ext3 using tune2fs -j /dev/sda2 (or 5 for my /home, 2 is my root) Then I modified fstab and put ext3 for each. After a reboot, the mount command says they are mounted as ext3. But when I

Hi, I've downloaded and installed kernel-2.4.9 from rawhide in order to use ext3 support (I've also upgraded the necessary packages). I've used tune2fs to make the current ext2 partitions (incluind /) and changed fstab to reflect that. In order to test if everything is ok (this is a test machine) I've switched off with no shutdown. Except the / all other partitions accused

Hello. We have, over the last few months, lost ext3 filesystems three times. The whole filesystem left unusable. nfs-server:~# mount /dev/rd/c0d1p1 /mnt -t ext3 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/rd/c0d1p1, or too many mounted file systems (in dmesg) EXT3-fs: journal inode is deleted. EXT3-fs: get root inode failed nfs-server:~# fsck /dev/rd/c0d1p1 Parallelizing

Hello all. I am currently using ext3 0.0.5d with great success. I am a bit conflicted about what to tell the system regarding my root filesystem however. I have my root filesystem configured and working as an ext3 filesystem, but it is/was not without some fraught. Using RedHat 7.0, if you simply create your journal on the root file- system, figure out it's inode number, issue a lilo -R

Hi, After our big ext3 file server crashes, I notice the fsck spends some time replaying the journals (about 5-10 mins for all volumes on the server in question). I guess it must do this should you want to mount the volumes as ext2. My question--is it (theoretically) possible to tell fsck only to replay half-finished and to knock out incomplete transactions from the journals, leaving the kernel

Good morning, I try to use the last release of ext3 patch with a 2.4.10 linux kernel. I have two troubles : - when the kernel is booting, I receive : NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 208k freed Adding Swap: 128480k swap-space (priority -1) Adding Swap: 128480k swap-space (priority -2) Why my root

When I first installed ext3, it worked as expected. After a crash, journals would be played, and no fsck. Now, every crash causes an fsck, just like it were a regular ext2, even though / has a journal and is being mounted as ext3. Some fs info for / Filesystem features: has_journal filetype sparse_super Filesystem state: not clean Errors behavior: Continue Some fs info for

Hello, We have run and stopped by chance command "fsck -y" on one of our raid disks (with ext3 file system). After that we have found that SOME files disappeared (they are not seen in the directories where they have been before). The data are extremely important and contain a lot of programs, scripts for some data analysis and very hard to recover by hands. I have run ''fsck

Hi, I have a 20GB partition on a hard disk that just developed bad blocks. Fortunately, I had backups for the most important data on it, but I'd like to recover some files that were too large to backup. When running 'e2fsck /dev/hdc3', I get the following message: e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002) Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... e2fsck: Invalid argument while checking

On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. > > This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. > > I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. I would

Hi. I'm using Debian. Is this a Redhat-only list, or is it only hosted by RedHat? I recently changed my filing systems over to ext3, but deliberately left the forced boot check parameters alone so my system checks after 20 mounts. I notice that the fsck takes a good ten times longer than under ext2, to perform the cleanly unmounted check. (On the occasion where I did unmount dirtily, the

I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. The following is the mailing list exchange: On 09/18/2014 07:01 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On

Hi, Suppose you have an ext2 Partition at 14GB which is 80-90% full. Most files are smaller than 1 MB (there are just 20 or so which are over 100MB where 800MB is the biggest one). Block size etc - everything is default. Now you do this: mke2fs -j /device Important is the "-j" switch. What happens without the "-j" switch? All superblocks and inodes are overwritten. Is this

Greetings. Total newbie with Ext3. I selected when I upgraded my system to RH7.2. I upgraded my system again to RH8.0. Here is some info: [root@world root]# cat /proc/mounts rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 /dev/root / ext3 rw 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 usbdevfs /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs rw 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs rw 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0 /dev/hdd1 /mnt/genericdata1 ext2 rw 0 0 Ok, so

An update to the ext3 filesystem for 2.4 kernels is available at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ The diffs are against linux-2.4.7 and linux-2.4.6-ac5. The changelog is there. One rarely-occurring but oopsable bug was fixed and several quite significant performance enhancements have been made. These are in addition to the performance fixes which went into 0.9.3. Ted has put out a

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:43:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Arthur Perry <alp at perryconsulting.net> To: ext3 at linuxfarms.com Subject: (regards to ext3 and RAID) Re: Linux consultation needed (fwd) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 08:11:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Arthur Perry <alp at perryconsulting.net> To: Christopher Welton

Edgar, As far as I see there is nothing wrong with the partition, if you change it from /(root) you should be able to mount it directly as long as the kernel supports ext3 filesystem and you use the correct -t option. Not even necessary to repair it. This is a guess, but what most probably happened is that ext3 is builtin as a module or the mount statement in the initrd in /linuxrc was not

Hey all, Had a power failure and subsequent ext3 disk corruptions. Attempting to fix, but not working. Its a 120 gig IDE disk, 3 partitions. /boot, /, and swap. Basically can't boot up since the box can't get to the system files in /usr/ or anything. So I'm booting off of a FC2 disk 1 in recovery mode and trying to fix the filesystem with e2fsck The boot partition cleaned up

Hi all . Can anyone tell me what are the other advantages of using ext3 over ext2 other than fast fast recovery on crashes A reply will be appreciated. Abhishek --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

Dear ext3 hackers, I'm running a RH 7.2 system with kernel 2.4.18 an a ext3 fs. Yesterday night this machine, which is being tested with a Proxy server (Squid), was accidentally power off (electrical outage). Now, when the system is booted, I have a ext2 'read only' fs; fsck doesn't find any kind of problem (automatic or manually executed: fsck -t ext3 /dev/sdb1). The only fstab