similar to: Hello

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "Hello"

2008 Dec 31
0
[LLVMdev] llvm ocaml bindings
Hi, thanks Chris and Gordon for the fantasic infrastructure and ocaml bindings and Erick for the prompt response! I'm looking to use LLVM to write program analyses for C/C++ programs, but to use Ocaml to write the analyses. I did see there were bindings for iterating over: * functions in a module [iter_functions] * basic blocks in a functions [iter_blocks] * instructions in a block
2008 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] llvm ocaml bindings
(ccing llvmdev) Hi Ranjit! I only ported Chris's tutorial and Gordon did the vast majority of the bindings, so they deserve most of the praise. I believe there are techniques for walking over the CFG. You can load up code using Llvm_bitreader, use things like Llvm.iter_globals, Llvm.iter_functions, and Llvm.iter_instrs to walk over the module, and write out a new llmodule using
2004 May 27
0
Please confirm (conf#08b6d7549e1ed966ddf75eba2c21840a)
<< IMPORTANT INFORMATION! >> This is an automated message. The message you sent (attached below) requires confirmation before it can be delivered. To confirm that you sent the message below, just hit the "R"eply button and send this message back (you don't need to edit anything). Once this is done, no more confirmations will be necessary. << INFORMA??O
2010 Jun 07
0
R-SIG-Fedora Digest, Vol 21, Issue 3
Ranjit, Thanks for the follow up, the open source community is incredible. Long story short, I was able to install through the repositories. Then cleaned up some other issues (tcl/tk, java and others) and did a custom install of 2.10. Which brings me to another question, when yum installed R2.11 as an update, did it use the settings from the original 2.10 repository installation or did it
2008 Dec 31
1
[LLVMdev] llvm ocaml bindings
On 2008-12-30, at 21:07, Ranjit Jhala wrote: > thanks Chris and Gordon for the fantasic infrastructure and ocaml > bindings and Erick for the prompt response! > > I'm looking to use LLVM to write program analyses for > C/C++ programs, but to use Ocaml to write the analyses. > I did see there were bindings for iterating over: > > * functions in a module
2003 Jan 07
1
smbd using alot of cpu on HP-UX 11.11
Hello Danny Travis, I am assuming you are using generic Samba 2.2.3a version. We came across the problem and you can fix it by setting the cache variable on the devnm() system cal to 1. Just set the last parameter to the devnm() call in smbd/quotas.c to 1. ################################### # ./samba2.2/source/smbd/quotas.c # ################################### 912a913,919 > #ifdef
2012 Apr 05
1
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code proposal: Adding memory safety checks to the LLVM bitcodes
On 4/3/12 9:54 AM, Raphael Ernani Rodrigues wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > I wrote a new proposal, to improve the static array bounds checking in > SAFEcode, as follows: > > > > Improving static array bounds checking in SAFEcode > ================================================== > > > Objective > --------- > > the main objective of this project is to
2004 Jul 27
2
computing differences between consecutive vector elements
Dear R-users, I am a newbie to R so please excuse this naive question for which I couldn't seem to find online answers. I have this data frame containing a series of locations through time (x,y,z,t). I would like to compute the difference in x, y and z between t-1 and t. Sounds easy enough, but how on earth does one loop through vector elements and compute this difference? Thanks Thomas
2004 Jul 28
5
using Rterm under cygwin, no possiblity to delete characters
Dear R-users, When I call Rterm from cygwin, I have no options but typing the exact syntax the first time. If I happen to hit the "delete" key (backspace), R dies when I press enter saying : Error: ... (error concerning the function on the last line of text) Execution halted Perhaps some of you have experienced this and found work arounds? One has to be pretty good to type without
2012 Apr 03
0
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code proposal: Adding memory safety checks to the LLVM bitcodes
Dear LLVMers, I wrote a new proposal, to improve the static array bounds checking in SAFEcode, as follows: Improving static array bounds checking in SAFEcode ================================================== Objective --------- the main objective of this project is to improve the static array bounds checking engine used in SAFECode. It was written after the open project at
2008 Nov 14
10
Shared volume: Software-ISCSI or GFS or OCFS2?
Hello list, I want to use shared volumes between severall vm''s and defenetly don''t want to use NFS or Samba! So i have three options: 1. simulated(software-) iscsi 2. GFS 3. OCFS2 What do you suggest and why? Kind regards, Florian ********************************************************************************************** IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any
2004 Dec 04
0
Problem connecting linux box to linux box in ad
Hi I have a customer running 2 RedHat 7.3 servers. These are running to gether with w2k and w2k3 machines in an Active Directory. I ran samba 2.0.7 and upgraded to 3.0.8 because of that the customer had to use restrict anonymous = 2 in windows, that stops the IPC$ share to be seen by anonymous connections. I configured Kerberos and could connect windows boxes to one of the linux boxes, the
2012 Mar 30
0
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code proposal: Adding memory safety checks to the LLVM bitcodes
On 3/30/12 1:08 PM, Raphael Ernani Rodrigues wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > My name is Raphael Ernani, and I am doing my MsC at the Federal > University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. I have been using LLVM for a > while, and I would like to participate in this year's Summer of Code. > One particular idea, in your "open projects" page caught my eye, and I > decided to
2004 Jul 27
1
[Fwd: multiple rsync simlataneously]
---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: multiple rsync simlataneously From: kbala@midascomm.com Date: Wed, July 21, 2004 7:51 pm To: rsync@lists.samba.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, We are using rsync to backup the data from 100 remote machine and the rsync process are started at the
2012 Apr 03
3
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code proposal: Adding memory safety checks to the LLVM bitcodes
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:49 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>wrote: > On 3/30/12 1:08 PM, Raphael Ernani Rodrigues wrote: > > Dear LLVMers, > > My name is Raphael Ernani, and I am doing my MsC at the Federal > University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. I have been using LLVM for a > while, and I would like to participate in this year's Summer of Code. >
2012 Mar 30
4
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code proposal: Adding memory safety checks to the LLVM bitcodes
Dear LLVMers, My name is Raphael Ernani, and I am doing my MsC at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. I have been using LLVM for a while, and I would like to participate in this year's Summer of Code. One particular idea, in your "open projects" page caught my eye, and I decided to write a proposal about it. The line that I liked in the page was "Create an LLVM
2002 Mar 30
2
(no subject)
A: do you have a "hosts allow" or "hosts deny" in rsyncd.conf? B: what version are you using? It seems i've seen messages about rsyncd in some versions refusing to allow unresolvable names in. C: Are you able to access the rsyncd, and just wonder about the log entries, or are you unable to get in? If it's just a log complaint, I wouldn't worry about it. Most
2007 Oct 09
2
Help with gamm errors
Dear All Hopefully someone out there can point out what I am missing! I have a (large, several hundred) dataset of gardens in which over two years the presence/absence of a particular bird species is noted each week. I have good reason to believe there is a difference between the two years in the weekly proportion of gardens and would like to assess this, before going on to look in more detail at
2004 Jun 16
1
This is an alert from eSafe
*** eSafe Gateway detected a hostile content in this email. *** Time: 16 Jun 2004 06:58:37 Scan result: Mail modified to remove malicious content Protocol: SMTP in File Name\Mail Subject: mail_1087383498: Re: Your details Source: samba@samba.org Destination: jmickel@ci.glendale.az.us Details: your_details.pif Infected with Win32.Netsky.d (Non-Removable), Blocked
2003 Jan 23
3
Who and When
How can I tell who and when users logged in to a Samba server? The clients are a mixture of Win9x computers. I want to compile a chart of computer use by user.