similar to: samba and very large files

Hello Everyone, I have been working with two samba servers and i am having problems with the copy speed that i am getting out of the boxes. This is my setup. Dell 450MHZ 128 Mem 2 qlogic fiber cards 1.6T software raid 5/LVM Netgear 10/100 @ 100FD RedHat 7.3 samba 3.0.2a another box is a Compaq 2500 200MHZ 32 Mem 12G software RAID 0 3 drives Intel Pro 100 @ 100FD Debian 3.0 Samba 2.2.8a-0.1 for

Greetings, I am trying, FROM a Linux Red Hat 7.3, to mount a share sitting on a Windows 2003 Server and I am getting the following problems. I had done this with a NT4 server and it was working fine. I am trying to mount the following: mount.smbfs //NT2003SERVER/share /mnt -o username=user,password=pass At first, I was getting the following error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is

Dear sirs! I kindly ask you to help me with the following problem. I need to mount MS DFS tree Linux filesystem. I have: Linux Slackware 9.0. Kernel 2.4.21 compiling with support SMB file system. Samba 2.2.8a compiling with --with-msdfs In order to mount I type: mount -t smbfs -o username=name,password=***,workgroup=work //server/DfsRoot/mnt/DfsTree after cd /mnt/DfsTree In the DfsTree directory

hello, maybe this is the wrong place, but according to http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html linux kernel cifs should be able to handle M$ dfs shares. I looked at the installation and usage instructions but it doesn't work. On the mount.cifs manpage I found no hint about a special switch to activate dfs parsing. Can anybody put some light into this? TIA -- Peter # uname

I finally got some time to implement a pair of options to upsc for listing all configured UPSes on a given upsd: http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset?new=branches%2Fupsc_list%2Fclients%2Fupsc.c%40859&old=trunk%2Fclients%2Fupsc.c%40821 http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/browser/branches/upsc_list/clients/upsc.c?rev=859 I think this should work with the new functions for parsing IPv6

I have a question I hope one of you can help me with. In what version did Samba begin to include support for SMB signing? It looks like 3.0 but I need to be sure. According to http://de.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0rc4.html <http://de.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-3.0.0rc4.html> on line 14 is states: 14) Full support for client and server SMB signing to ensure compatibility

Hi Carlos, How do you do? :) Can you please clarify the change introduced by the subj (http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/changeset/1289)? I need to know in particular why did you add these intervals between sending a command and reading the response. They are the root of weird problems with megatec_usb. Can I safely remove READ_PACE and usleep-s? I tried to search the archives and found the

Could someone please check and see what I am doing wrong with automake in branches/AsciiDoc? http://boxster.ghz.cc/projects/nut/browser/branches/AsciiDoc/docs/Makefile.am?rev=1917 The problem is that 'make html' never recurses into docs/website. I have listed 'website' in the 'SUBDIRS' section of docs/Makefile.am, and 'docs/website/Makefile' is listed in the

[the mailing list you want is nut-upsuser.] On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Blagovest Kolenichev wrote: > Hi, all > > I had fail to find in the supported hardware page > > http://www.networkupstools.org/compat/stable.html > > support for "NOVA AVR 625", but see that "NOVA AVR 600 Serial" > is supported. Can you tell us is there a big difference between

In a past thread I've notice that smbmount (and mount's suport for it) will be discontinued and smbclient should be used insted. Sorry if the question is too lame but I use it in some of my systems now and I think I'll have trouble porting then to smbclient. Is smbmount been removed because it relays on kernel smb support? Samba will not need smb support in kernel in the

Hi I'm hoping someone can help. I'm running fc5 with nut 2.0.3. I just recently acquired 2 Gamatronic SmartCompact ups for my Linux boxes. As you can see from the info below, everything looks ok. When I unplug the ups from the wall, after a while, the computer shutdowns very rudely. That it is just turns off. No scrolling down of processes shutting down It does not seem shutdown

Hello, Samba-users, please don?t beat me, but I have to ask this question here, as I haven?t found an answer I can rely on until now. I am working on a solution for a backup-problem and one possible solution could be the use of smbfs/smbmount. I am testing that now, mounting a WinXPHome(sorry, testing ...)-share which is 20GB of size (8GB used) to my linux-box. The linux-box is a bit more

I have encountered this error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 26595: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed when I am attempting to mount a windows xp machine from a linux machine: mount -t smbfs //machine/share /root/smb_mnt -o username=administrator,password=mypass I have looked through the archives and found the following information concerning this

Hi all, I''m seeing some unexpected behaviour in a nested model and I''m not sure if it''s a bug or if I''m doing something wrong. When assigning nested attributes, the associated object gets replaced with a new record. Example code: class Car < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :driver end class Car < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :driver end

I was trying to merge the Debian unstable packaging files with the NUT trunk, and I noticed a bit of a problem with the automake changes. For the uninitiated, the 'debian/rules' file is essentially a Makefile that is used to build the package and split things into the sub-packages. If you look at line 85 of this copy of the rules file:

THE GOOD: NUT is able to communicate with my Powerware 5115A over USB using the bcmxcp_usb driver: ambient.temperature: 38 battery.charge: 99 battery.runtime: 9000 battery.voltage: 27.07 driver.name: bcmxcp_usb driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port: auto driver.version: 2.2.1 driver.version.internal: 0.13 input.frequency: 50.34 input.voltage: 235 output.current: 0.0

Hi, Excuse my poor english !! I have a problem samba between linux and windows. I explain my actual situation : - windows 2000 SP4 - share a directory my_windows : d:\jagodin\partage - linux Redhat ES 4 - kernel version 2.6.9-5 in /etc/fstab : //my_windows/partage /export/home/cerit/jagodin/partage smbfs

Hi! I've just searching the list archives but cannot solve my problem with mounting samba (v3.0) shares back on linux (RH 8.0 and 9). Mounting on Win clients works fine and any filenames (including long names with non-ascii chars and spaces) are perfictly supported and accessed. Mounting the share back on (even the same) linux box is a complex task. I use: mount -t smbfs -o guest

I'm trying to set up a "dropbox" application that will monitor a directory for newly created files and process them. The problem I am having is that my linux process is not recognizing that a file is still being written to by another server. Here's the configuration: Redhat Linux with 2.4.9-31smp kernel using SAMBA 2.0.10 client to mount a share that exists on a Windows 2000

I used to mount following share using samba client on RHEL 3.0 without any problems. Then I installed ES4.0 and I started seeing problems with these samba shares. I have following line in fstab to mount the share : //bizgroup/wli1 /wli1 smbfs uid=501,gid=501,credentials=/etc/samba/.smbpassword 0 0 and /etc/samba/.smbpassword contains following username=xxxxxxx