similar to: Why is .journal file sometimes visible and sometimes not?

I am writing a package, which contains several functions and variables. The variables are for internal use by functions. Functions are ment to be callable by a user. However, the function cannot access these variables. The package contains only R code, and was created using package.skeleton package.skeleton(name="ac9", list=c(ls(pattern="(AB2)|(ac9)"),

I am writing a package. Please, study the sequence of my actions below, and comment, what's incorrect. The package contains pure R code. 1. At the one level up from the package directory, from the system command prompt: R CMD build --binary ac9 This produces the file ac9_0.1.zip (The package name is ac9, and the package's DESCRIPTION file says its version is 0.1) 2. Then I run Rgui in

Patches against 2.4.10-pre4 and 2.4.9-ac9 are at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ It's a fairly large change. The most significant parts are * the inclusion of Stephen's error-handling work, which is designed to remount the fs read-only in the presence of software and hardware errors, rather than forcing a panic. * Stephen's fix for the journal_revoke assertion

Hi! I've got some "serious" quota-problems with ext3... it seems not to work at all... I'm currently running 249-ac9 with no patches, slackware 7.x-current from january or so, all the quota-utils from the original distribution. the kernel prompts correctly "VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized" and that was it. neither quotacheck nor repquota or any other

Has anyone had any success with the interactivity.patch on the ext3 website? I'm going to try to use it because I've had a lot of lockups in past day under heavy load with 2.4.9-ac9, and I can't figure out if it's because of ext3 or VM or my crappy VIA IDE controller.

For some time now im trying to get to know what causes such configuration of QOS (kernel 2.4.25-2.4.28 + IMQ patch and ofcourse wrr): -- WRR_MAX_CLASSES=200 DEV_IN=imq0 ifconfig $DEV_IN down ifconfig $DEV_IN up tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} handle 1:0 root htb default 10 tc class add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:0 classid 1:10 htb rate 1000kbit burst 1kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev ${DEV_IN} parent 1:10

Hi All, I''ve just installed WRR and am looking at tools to monitor, graph and display the system and throughput of each queue/class/filter. I''ve looked at: iptraf - only shows tcp/udp flows, not QOS queue throughputs show.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) tc-graph.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) polltc_ - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can

I have set up wrr successfully on my bridge/shaper machine. That much works fine. I originally used sfq in the inner classes. However, there was a problem with high-bandwidth connections (web downloads, bittorrent) starving low-bandwidth low-latency connections like ssh. I would like to use prio or similar to prioritize the interactive traffic, but it does not seem to work. I have tested with

Hello, I am new to R. I often collect data at multiple sites and need to create separate graphs (such as scatterplots or histograms) of specific variables for each site. I have tried to do this by splitting the data frame and then using lapply, but it seems that the graphing commands cannot be called as functions. Here is a sample of my data, called "seeddist2": site

Hi all, to raise the bug vs success ratio i'd like to express my gratitude to all samba members and those who, though not in-core developers, generously supported noobs like me on this mail list. I've set up an environment two months ago and it has run without glitches or tweaks since then. Now as misusing my family as beta testers has worked out so nicely i will deploy an identical

I have a machine running 2.4.25 w/ wrr, ebtables-brnf, iptables CLASSIFY and esfq patches (not using esfq, though). I have wrr set up, and within each class I want to prioritize ssh, web, etc..., but right now I am testing with pings. I have the following in my POSTROUTING mangle table: CLASSIFY icmp -- anywhere anywhere CLASSIFY set 0:6 I find that if I attach a prio

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I

I would like to implement an architecture to support LLQ and WFQ with Qos linux elements ! Is possible use CBQ (you can set same parameters to control WRR process) or HTB (how can i controll DRR process) structure ? My idea is to classify packets by List flows, tos flows or connections flows (as CBWFQ on CISCO ) I saw also for WRR patch (http://www.zz9.dk/wrr), but I don''t understand

hi list, i''m about to setup traffic shaping on a server and got some small questions about the setup. i read alot of docs/howto''s but there are still some questions i''d like to ask. setup on the box is: - external if is ppp0 (dsl) - internal if in eth0 (with ~15 nat''ed boxes) - openvpn at tun1 since all ppl on the lan feel like they have to use p2p i decided

happens. It also appears that somewhere in steps 1 and 2 above Word sends a request to turn off the read,write,and execute bits for the owner of the file. When you look at this filesystem after the attempted save the original file does indeed have these bits cleared (i.e. the user has no read,write,or execute permissions on the file), and that I think is why the error is being generated.

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Hello I have problem with wrr and more than 1300 classes when i try to add qdisc like: tc qdisc add dev imq1 parent 1:21 handle 1000: wrr dest ip 1512 0 then i have a message like: RTNETLINK answers: Cannot allocate memory And some other problem: When I do more than 2048 filters I have message like: Classes: tc class add dev imq1 parent 1:1 classid 1:9 htb rate 1024kbit ceil 2048kbit .. tc

Fellow riders of the bleeding edge of ext3 technology, I've been playing with ext3 on my workstation. For the most part it has worked very well, but right now I have a non-functional system. I've got patches out the wazoo on this kernel - 2.2.18 + Alan's 2.2.19pre13 + ext3-0.0.6a + i2c-2.5.5 + lm_sensors-2.5.5 + udf-0.9.3. Here is the output I get: EXT3-fs: WARNING: recovery