Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "Samba Print "ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy""
2003 Oct 20
1
"NULL dest in safe_strcpy"
I'm running Samba 3.0.0 and seeing a lot of
Oct 20 10:02:25 littleboy smbd[2062]: [2003/10/20 10:02:25, 0]
lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
Oct 20 10:02:25 littleboy smbd[2062]: ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
messages. Most things (except the problem I posted earlier) seem to
work perfectly.
2003 Nov 17
1
printer permissions <-> ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy (samba 3.0.0)
Hi Jerry et al,
I'm using SAMBA 3.0.0 on Solaris 9, it looks very cute, unfortunately I
can not set the permissions on the printers (I can as an admin add a
user etc. but all changes are lost after applying):-(
Is this somehow related to the error entries in the log file:
[2003/11/17 14:45:31, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
If so will it be fixed in
2004 Jul 14
4
String overflow in safe_strcpy .
Just Installed 3.0.5rc1 and the problem persists unfortunately,
heres a sample of my log :
wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600)
Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: ERROR: string overflow by 1
(9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [TAENO~EI.PDF]
Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0]
lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600)
Jul 12 12:31:03
2007 Nov 14
2
lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy ERROR: string overflow by 1
Hi,
I've seeing the following error messages recorded in logwatch against
samba in two FC6 XA-64 systems with samba 3.0.24-7.
lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(603) ERROR: string overflow by 1 (24 - 23) in safe_strcpy
The main share in use on the first machine is via the guest account with Vista and XP clients, the other has more conventional shares with the Vista PC's as domain members
2004 Jun 24
2
string overflow in safe_strcpy
I recently upgraded both of my samba servers (mirrors of each other) to
3.0.4, my log files now fill with the following messages (hundred lines
per day):
Jun 24 13:55:33 Clyde smbd[8597]: [2004/06/24 13:55:33, 0]
lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(602)
Jun 24 13:55:33 Clyde smbd[8597]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8)
in safe_strcpy [LIBRA~V$.DOC]
Jun 24 14:20:34 Clyde smbd[8597]: [2004/06/24
2007 Jul 20
2
safe_strcpy errors from winbindd (Samba 3.0.25b)
Hi,
we've upgraded recently from samba 3.0.23 to 3.0.25b. Since then, we've getting these error
messages from winbindd:
Jul 17 12:00:23 cvk027 winbindd[20772]: [2007/07/17 12:00:23, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(659)
The volume of these messages is very high, many times together with unreadable character garbage.
Is there any way to correct or suppress these messages?
Our
2007 Nov 30
0
ERROR: string overflow in safe_strcpy
Hello All,
Our samba server rarely shows up follwing message in syslog.
When this message appears, CPU average will be pretty high.
winbindd[9585]: [2007/11/28 15:55:02, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(659)
winbindd[9585]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (256 - 255) in safe_strcpy [01092-6821
winbindd[9585]: S-1-5]
Hardware: Dell PowerEdge 2950
OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES4 Update 4
2004 Sep 21
0
3.0.7; "string overflow by 1 (32 - 31) in safe_strcpy"
Hello,
I'm using samba 3.0.4 (on RHL9) as a W2k3 domain member in an ADS realm. For
printing I'm using CUPS of RHL9. The XP clients get the CUPS printers (CUPS
redirects the printjob to the JetDirect card of the printer) and the
appropriate PCL drivers installed via the "Point 'n Print" mechanism. The
clients get their printers installed via de AD login script and the there
2004 Sep 01
0
Issues after upgrade to 3.0.6 from 3.0.4; fixed in 3.0.7?
Hello,
I run samba 3.0.4 on a RHL9 server. Samba is a domain member of a W2k3 ADS
and I use CUPS as printing mechanism; therefore Samba is compiled with
Kerberos 1.3.1-7 and cups-devel.
3.0.4 runs pretty good, printing via CUPS runs well too, only the following
messages I see constantly (this flooding my logs) while using 3.0.4:
winbindd.log
=========
[2004/07/27 16:07:04, 1]
2003 Dec 11
1
downloaded win98 print drivers fail in Samba 3.0
Windows 98 client cannot print via samba to PrintPro printer "exported"
via Cups/PrintPro on PrintPro/Samba server. "Exporting" with Cups on
server node allows print drivers to be downloaded to Windows clients from
the server. Any help or suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Win98 node gim98.rsmas.miami.edu [129.171.97.21] connects to Samba 3.0.0-15
server "prima"
2003 Oct 02
1
Unable to enable Add/Remove Printer Drivers (3.0.0)
I used to be able to load printer drivers via "server properties". Now
when I go in the printer drivers are listed and I can use the properties
button but the Add/Remove buttons are greyed out. This is a Samba
3.0.0/2.4.2-SGI_XFS_1.0 box and I've tried both NT4sp6 and Win2003beta
clients (both exhibit the same behaviour).
I see the following in the log when I connect to
2004 Aug 20
3
3.0.6 & "string overflow by 1"
I updated one of my file servers to 3.0.6, and while file serving is
improved (no M$-Office file already open messages), every time I access
a printer my logs flood with messages like to those below. It seems I
can set printer properites, etc... but when I print the jobs seem to go
to never-never land (still researching where the jobs go).
[2004/08/20 08:46:27, 0]
2003 Nov 06
1
strange error-report in smbd.log
Hi,
I found the following strange report in smbd.log (using Samba3.0.1pre2cvs):
[2003/11/05 10:10:49, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
[2003/11/05 10:10:49, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
[2003/11/05 10:10:49, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
Can anyone help me? Is this all
2008 Jul 30
4
panic action on samba 3.2
Hi,
during I make a some du command (du -sh), samba has been disturb and sent
a panic action :
Last line of smbd.log :
[2008/07/30 15:36:09, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(709)
ERROR: string overflow by 1 (16 - 15) in safe_strcpy
[10.217.7.3/255.255.252.0]
[2008/07/30 16:04:43, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(709)
ERROR: string overflow by 1 (16 - 15) in safe_strcpy
2003 Nov 15
6
Samba 3 and CUPs printer causes explorer to abend
I am attempting to setup a Samba printserver to replace our Windows Print
servers.
I have defined a few printers in CUPS, some raw, and some not.
When I use the GUi to upload the drivers, The dialog works, however after
that is accomplished, any attempt to get the printer properties or to use
the printer from my W2K system (cpq0277) causes explorer to ABEND.
System setup:
RedHat 9
CUPS
2008 Jul 02
2
[3.2.0] Off by one error
Jerry,
The 3.2.0 release is reporting this in the log.nmbd
[root@beta samba]# cat log.nmbd
[2008/07/02 12:26:52,? 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(849)
? nmbd version 3.2.0 started.
? Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008
[2008/07/02 12:26:52,? 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(709)
ERROR: string overflow by 1 (16 - 15) in safe_strcpy [192.168.100.20/24]
Other than this issue; no real
2003 Sep 26
0
samba cups point'n print for 3.0.0
I am having trouble getting point n' print working under 3.0.0.
I get these
[2003/09/26 12:57:32, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
[2003/09/26 12:57:32, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
[2003/09/26 12:57:32, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
On the client side it just
2004 Sep 06
0
3.0.6 & "string overflow by 1" revisited
Gerald Carter wrote:
>| every time I access a printer my logs flood with messages
>| like to those below. It seems I can set printer
>| properites, etc... but when I print the jobs seem to go
>| to never-never land (still researching where the jobs go).
>|
>| [2004/08/20 08:46:27, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600)
>| ERROR: string overflow by 1 (32 - 31) in
2007 Dec 19
3
IDMAP RID problems and documentation
Hello List,
After upgrading to 3.0.25b (Also tried 3.0.28) I tried to make use of the
new syntax for IDMAP. But I failed, Also there is a lack on documentation
how to us it. (Yes there is a man, but it contains limited explanation and
examples).
What do I want? What (I think a lot of people wants)
I have two samba domain members and a Windows 2003 DC without R2 / SFU shema
extension. So I
2004 Dec 06
3
ADS Authentication
I'm about ready to smash my head through a wall...I could use a few answers.
1. When using security = ads, and completing net ads join, it was my
understanding that samba authenticated username/pword against ads, and
local posix accounts were nolonger needed, is this true?
2. If yes, I have not been able to get it to work. If I have a posix
user account with the same name as one in