similar to: 3.0.2rc1, LDAP, Solaris 9 and secondary group problem - Bug 395?

Hi, we are running several test installations of Samba 3 on Solaris 8 and Solaris 9. On Solaris 9, there is a strange behaviour in terms of getting secondary group information from LDAP. With later revisions of patch 112960, only /etc/group is interpreted, but there is no query on the LDAP server for (Unix-) group information. Here is a short overview about our results: common configuration:

I am trying to compile the small Samba 3.0.2a source on Solaris 9 to use ldap. The ./configure run reports: "WARNING: libldap is needed for LDAP support". The Solaris installation has it's native libldap installed in /usr/lib, but the configuration does not seem to find it. Would anyone know what I am missing? Thanks...dlb David Bost Dow Jones and Co. 4300 North Route 1 South

Hi list, After kudos, time comes again with problems. This time, still on the same setup as before : - Linux PDC with ldapsam, ran by RH9, OpenLDAP 2.0.27 (stock RH9 RPM+Solaris RootDSE patch), Samba 3.0.1rc1 recompiled from SRPM ; - Linux BDC is the same ; The PDC and BDC are working Ok, so I won't include the smb.conf from these. - Solaris 9 domain member (jersey) gets Posix accounts

I was wondering if any one else is having issues with supplementary groups not being recognized. It seems as if Samba is ignoring the sup.groups. I'm using RH9.0 on Intel with samba-3.0.0-2_rh9 and OpenLDAP 2.0.27. When I do a "id -a username" the user is in all the necessary groups but when accessing shares the users' primary GID is used only. For example, uid=1001(jgray)

Hi! -I've separated samba-3.0.2a and openldap-2.1 on two computers with Slackware 9.1 -smbldap_populate.pl genertated all standard groups and the Administrator account -The ldap seams to work now ldapsearch -H ldap://l1.dbb.su.se/ -b dc=dbb,dc=su,dc=se -x ldap_bind: Confidentiality required (13) additional info: TLS confidentiality required -This is like it should be since the server

I have Samba 3.0.4 running on Solaris 9 sparc platform. I would like the user use there AD login and password. I have setup similar config on Linux and it works fine. So I am not sure why is not working Solaris 9. Here is the error message I am getting. #net join -U admin@domain_name [2004/06/17 10:04:27] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter Unknown parameter encountered: "realm"

Hi, finally the compatibility problems between the LDAP libraries from Sun and OpenLDAP on Solaris 9, known as bug# 395, are solved. With Patch-ID 112960-22 everything is working as it should. Tests were OK for a Samba PDC with LDAP backend and a Samba fileserver with "security = ADS", both on Solaris 9 with native Sun LDAP client. Secondary group information is requested from the LDAP

Hello. I have been trying to find an answer to a problem that has plagued our systems. I am trying to upgrade from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23c. I have been able to compile, but when I go to join it to the AD domain, I keep getting this familiar error that many others have noted but have not posted many solutions to. arcdba-> ./net ads join -U Administrator Administrator's password: Using short

Hi, I have two users (one is me), connecting to the same directory tree on a Solaris box, for simplicity using smbclient for Samba 3.0.2a. In this tree, group permissions are set to rwx for a group that we are both in. I own some dirs, my colleague owns others. If I log in, I can put a file in any directory in the tree. If my colleague logs in, he can only write to directories that he owns.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Grzegorz S?jka <gs at sojka.co> wrote: > Hi there, > > I have 4 identical monitors. So I decided to buy (not to expensive, > around 100USD) quad head graphics card. I do not need anything > particular. Only office applications, no gaming. The crucial thing is > that I would like to be able to span a single window across all 4 > monitors.

On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 22:46:36 +0200 Peter Koch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba-experts, > > I'm trying to setup automatic printer download with our > samba 4.19.4 fileserver which is a domain member of > our samba 4.18.2 AD. > > printer drivers have been installed on the fileserver: > > root at serv00:# rpcclient -Uprtadmin%pass1

Hi Rowland, Thanks very much for your quick response. > Have you tried the command with a member of Domain Admins instead of > Administrator ? I just did and I now feel that something is wrong with our Administrator-account. Granting the SePrintOperatorPrivilege to user NAV\prtadmin with user NAV\Administator failes on our fileserver (INVALID PASSWORD). Granting the

Dear Samba-experts, I'm trying to setup automatic printer download with our samba 4.19.4 fileserver which is a domain member of our samba 4.18.2 AD. printer drivers have been installed on the fileserver: root at serv00:# rpcclient -Uprtadmin%pass1 SERV00 -c enumdrivers [Windows x64] Printer Driver Info 1: Driver Name: [Kyocera TASKalfa 5052ci NAEV] CUPS-printers have been installed

Hi, I'm newbie with Samba. I'm using Samba-3.0 directly installed with Fedora core. I've made a PDC linux server with Samba-3.0, openldap-2.1.22 with pam_ldap everything seems to be good but not with net groupmap. when using command: "net groupmap list" I have the following error : [2003/12/15 17:52:15, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_setsamgrent(2048) ldapsam_setsamgrent:

Hello, if ipconfig is run as ipconfig :::::: (i.e. long spec with all fields empty) and the computer has multiple network interfaces and only one of them is connected to dhcp managed network, ipconfig ends up in an infinite loop (see the log bellow). The following patch solved this for me. According to README, if the <device> in the long spec is empty, the first interface should be

Hi List! I've got a problem that I've read about on the web several times now, regarding the uploading of printer drivers to the samba [print$] share. When I try to set the printer driver for an existing printer (HP LaserJet 6L enabled with CUPS) the W2K wizard let me select the driver *.inf file but when finishing I get the well known error message: "Unable to install Intel,

Hi, after upgrading samba from 4.1.17 to 4.1.19 on OpenSuSE 13.2, any shares offered by this machine can nolonger be accessed, when these shares contain an entry "force group" which specifies a local unix group and when there exists a unix user with the same name. Here's an excerpt from smb.conf: [FactWork] comment = FactWork-Downloadportal path =

Hello, what would be the easiest and fastest way to migrate a file based DomU to a LVM based DomU. Given that the file contains a partition table + partitions. I tried with an dummy approach: dd if=/path/to/file.img of=/dev/volumegroup/logical-volume. That gives me a logical volume that xm create refuses to use.... Reinhard _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org