similar to: Samba3.0.1 - can't join new XP Pro pc to domain

When adding machines to a Samba-2.2 controlled domain, the ?add user script? was used to create the UNIX identity of the Machine Trust Account. Samba-3 introduces a new ?add machine script? that must be specified for this purpose. Samba-3 will not fall back to using the ?add user script? in the absence of an ?add machine script?. > We have a very simple samba PDC setup using smbpasswd.

Last month, I updated to Fedora 10 with samba 3.2.11-0.30.fc10 via a complete reinstall. Using x86-64. We are now experiencing a problem on a share with the force user parameter. [zz] comment = Test Share path = /home/zz force user = zzadminp create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 The primary group of zzadminp above is admplus. If user markoren with

I recently upgraded from samba 3.0.10-1.fc3 to 3.0.21b-2 running on FC5. Today was the first day of a typing class which uses the network version of Mavis Beacon Typing which depends on file sharing. The users are hanging and then getting an error message during logging into the product. In /var/log/message, I can see the following message for each user similar to: [2006/04/24

I had the same problem after upgrading to 3.0.23a. I have one samba PDC running a basic setup back to the smbpasswd file, and one that runs OpenLDAP. The former did exactly as yours, and I ended up rolling back to version 3.0.23. On the latter, the smb process refused to run, reporting that it could not contact the database. I ended up having to remove all the database files and reinstall

This is obviously not a long term acceptable solution. Could someone please enlighten me as to the permanent solution, or at least see why it doesn't work? This is not my problem, therefore I have not had the opportuntity to test - I don't have a version that old. Let me know if it is solved in a newer version as well. Thanks. It is a workable solution, although the generally accepted

Hi Somebody knows about the samba3.0.1 bugs? 'cause I try to map unix group, same after run the net groupmap command, but don't work... When I try the same think with samba3.0.0, this mapping work properly. Somebody explain this to me, please! -- Gilberto Nunes Suporte Rede Bonja - Bom Jesus/Ielusc Fone: 433-0155 - ramal 235 www.ielusc.br - suporte@ielusc.br Linux User n?

Hy, Staff! I am trying to configure RH9 + Samba3.0.1 + LDAP, and am using the manual that I lowered in the following site: http://www.hilinski.net/samba/. But this happening the following error: "Name of the Window(W2K Pro): Identification of Net " " the error to follow occurred in the attempt of ingression in domain LABORATORIO:" "it was not possible to locate the user

Dear Samba-Team, I already wrote to Jeremy Allison an he told me to post my problem to you: I have the following problem: The smbd and winbindd start fine, everthing seems to be okay, all users can be authenticated. But a few minutes later the winbindd is suddenly unable to authenticate some users against the Domain. You can see it in the snapshot. Messages like "Unable to initgroups"

I recently installed Fedora 9 for use as a squid server. We use smb_auth basic authorization and have run into a problem with it. I believe that I have tracked the problem down to smbclient when the USER environmental variable contains the userid and password. smb_auth.sh in squid uses the USER environmental variable. Below are test results for Version 3.0.28a-0.fc8 and Version

Dear All, I have successfully compiled MIT krb5 and samba 3.0.28a under Solaris8. Joining an AD domain works fine and also the commands wbinfo -t, -g and -u list all of the users. getent passwd and getent group are also working. The problem now is that when i run the "group user" command it just stays there and doesn't display any users. This works fine under Linux (SLES9, RHEL4)

Hello, I'm using Samba 3.0.1 with LDAP backend running as a PDC here. When I start up usrmgr.exe from Windows NT, it will read all the users (or computers, for srvmgr.exe) in the domain and report them back correctly. However, whomever I am logged in as ( including gid 512 users) it will not let me see details or change anything. In the logs after trying to view a users details I will get

Hi everyone! I've googled alot for this, and found *some* people with similar questions, but there was no answer if this is a bug in samba, a misconfiguration, or what? I have a win2000 active directory Server (wurzel.baum.local), a samba 2.2.3a on debian stable/woody (stamm.baum.local), security = user, a samba 3.0.1 on debian testing/Sarge (blatt1.baum.local) and a windowsxp machine joined

I'm running Red Hat version 7.2 as server. It has been fully upgraded from Red Hat UP2DATE. Samba 2.2.3a is currently running on the server with a working smb.conf file. I've noted a lot of comments/suggestions to upgrade to Samba 2.2.7. I find 2 files on the samba.org site for Red Hat 7.x: samba2.2.7-1.i386.rpm and samba2.2.7.src.rpm When trying to install with the Package Manager I

Hello list, I upgraded from Samba3.0.1 to Samba3.0.2rc1 and got now following problems: LaserJet printers 6MP (sorry, we have no other LaserJet printermodels) now couse the application to crash. With Samba3.0.1 there was no probem with that kind of Printers. I use the RPM's from ftp.sernet.de for SLES8. Printingsystem is CUPS, with raw printing and serverbased printerdrivers. Has anyone

Hi, I'm glad that helped you : ) About SPN, I found that link few days ago: https://adsecurity.org/?page_id=183 It tries to list the string values available usable for SPN. And it gives also that link: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/717.service-principal-names-spns-setspn-syntax-setspn-exe.aspx That one is a technet paper to explain SPNs. I tried to read it but

I'm not an expert, especially when it comes to servicePrincipalName which I haven't understood until now but I think it is safe to give an object the right to modify itself. If securing is one of your main concern, you could try to remove the possibility to that account to modify itself, once the servicePrincipalName is created. Doing that SPN should NOT be removed (no right to remove it)

Try this on your samba DC. amba-tool spn list PCNAME$ You should see something like: PCNAME$$ User CN=PCNAME,CN=Computers,DC=internal,DC=domain,DC=tld has the following servicePrincipalName: HOST/PCNAME HOST/PCNAME.internal.domain.tld nfs/PCNAME.internal.domain.tld nfs/PCNAME.internal.domain.tld at YOUR_REALM can you confirm this for both your servers which

Hi Mathias and all. Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2016, 13:26:12 CEST schrieb mathias dufresne: > Hi, > > I'm glad that helped you : ) > > About SPN, I found that link few days ago: > https://adsecurity.org/?page_id=183 > It tries to list the string values available usable for SPN. > > And it gives also that link: >

Dearl all, I have setup samba2.2.7 with cups1.1.14. In win2k client, the browse the printer share and install the windows 2000 printer successfuly. When I try to print some to it, nothing will be printed out. I check the cups's error_log found the following message: "E [11/Dec/2002:20:35:43 +0800] print_job: Unsupported format 'application/octet-stream'!" Also, I check

I'm going through the Kaleidoscope tutorial, adding the codegen() functions: https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl03.html. I cannot find any discussion of header files to include, (other than the include of llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h in the lexer/parser code), and the compilation is failing due to several undefined symbols: LogErrorV, Value, LLVMContext, APFloat, and others. I've been hunting