similar to: Winbind local idmap/cache database security concerns

I am currently working on implementing unified logons between linux and win computers on an NT4 domain. I have a samba test server with winbind working properly. All is going well, except that I am concerned about the winbind idmap database stored on the local linux workstations. My current understanding of winbind is that it must be on every machine, unless an winbind samba ldap

A few days ago I upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.0.9, and since the upgrade, the winbindd_idmap.tdb has not ever been modified, even after several restarts of samba, and reboots of the system in question. It appears that the UID mapping is still correct on the samba server, but I am just concerned that new user additions etc are not being stored to the tdb files. winbind_cache.tdb is being updated with

On 2016-01-10 at 17:58 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/01/16 17:05, Partha Sarathi wrote: > > > > > This could have a lot to do with the fact that idmap_rid & > > > idmap_autorid calculate the uids differently i.e if you have RID > > > '2025000', autorid would calculate this as '1102500000' , rid > > > would calculate this as

On 21:52:01 wrote Ryan Ashley: > Alright, I already gave every group a gIDNumber using the "advanced > features" option via the "Attribute Editor". Each group has a unique > ID. There are 16 built-in groups (domain admins, domain users, etc) > and five I have. My last group ended with 10021. The first group was > 10001. I then stopped S4 on my print-server,

I have Fedora Core 1 workstations configured with winbind logging onto our NT domain. Everything is going well except that I cannot seem to figure out how to connect to a windows home directory on a Win2000 server. Here is the scenario: W2K server with home directories for each user: Each user has modify permissions to their share Administrator has full control First off, I need to somehow

Hello everybody, had anyone of you problems with winbind and tdbfiles, when upgrading from 3.0.14a to 3.0.20a? The Symptom was: After upgrading to 3.0.20a the idmapping was corrupt. Although 3.0.20a runs fine, none of the idmaping was resolved correctly. Downgrading to 3.0.14a "restored" the idmaps. tdbdump showed me the same idmappings, therefor i think winbind wasn't able

Hello all, I'd like to know how to clear winbind cache. The problem is that we have decided to change uid and gid mapping range, but changing smb.conf accordingly didn't help. We use ldap as backend. After deleting all idmap entries in ldap nothing changed. If we disable winbindd caching with -n switch we receive desired effect - users get mapped to new uids and gids. Restarting winbindd

Hi! I have a setup with several Linux machines running samba-3.0.22-10.1.17 (from SuSE 10 OSS), authenticating against an AD. Since one of the machines is exporting an NFS share mounted by the rest of the machines, I need SID <-> uid/gid mapping to be shared between all Linux machines, which led me into using an OpenLDAP server as idmap backend. My smb.conf is found at the end of this mail.

Am 05.10.2016 um 22:12 schrieb Rob via samba: > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> This is very strange, have you tried running 'net cache flush' on the >> domain member ? >> >> Have you compared the users AD objects ? > > Running 'net cache flush' on the member does fix things, albeit only > for a while: > > # wbinfo -i

Hello all. I use Samba 3.6.3 on FreeBSD in combination with ZFS, and it all works fine. I use zfs send to receive my store on a backup machine and i want the users id to be the same as on the master server so to say. Keeps my backups easy accessable with samba! Now i know i can dump the IDMAP database using the following: net idmap dump. I expect a whole bunch of lines,but i get the following,

Thanks for the reply. Now we end-up with mix uid/gid from both ranges in cache TDBs. Few user logins are denied with below error in smbd.log, *[2016/01/07 11:39:44.475960, 1, pid=5202] ../source3/auth/token_util.c:430(add_local_groups* ** SID S-1-5-21-3082371790-1274690562-2878062458-5771 -> getpwuid(10005771) failed** wbinfo --user-info=mariond mariond:*:10015138:110000513:Marion,

Testing 3.6.0 on a member server of a 3.5.8 domain shows some strange problems. With the standard: idmap config * : backend = tdb no results are returned by getent, and wbinfo does not always work, also no winbind_idmap.tdb file is ever created. by changing to: idmap config * : backend = rid or idmap config * : backend = hash results are obtained but are the same regardless of

Hi, I have recently done some test with samba and connected it to AD to try to get uid and gid from the SFU extension of AD. When I run getent passwd i get the following output: <snip> test1:x:10003:16777216:test1:/home/test1:/bin/ksh test2:x:10001:16777216:test2:/home/test2:/bin/sh test3:x:16777216:16777216:test3:/home/test3:/bin/bash test4:x:10005:16777216:test4:/home/test4:/bin/bash

Hello, > I have the following entries, among others, in my smb.conf file: > ===== cut here ===== > logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U > [profiles] > comment = User Profiles > path = /usr/home/profiles > public = yes > writable = yes > browseable = yes > ===== cut here ===== > So, I expect 'net use z: /home' on a win95 machine to map z: to >

Hello, I am currently integrating 20 workstations and 5 Servers (all Dell Products) running Red Hat 7.2 (2.4.7-10) into a Windows 2000 / NT Enterprise network of about 2,000 users. I have been using a Samba server (version 2.2.1) with "security=domain" so that any user with a W2K domain logon can access the Samba file server. However, I want to move into full integration and set up all

Hi All, I would like to set up a samba server but using the same user / pass for unix logins and smb logins. This works fine if I use non-encrypted passwords but I have to apply the registry patch to set my win98 clients to use non-encrypted passwords. Could I use pam_smb to authenticate the Linux box against its own smb server then use encrypted smb passwords? I understand that if the smb

I'm using SUSE linux 2.4.19-4GB samba-client-2.2.5-226 pam_smb-1.1.6-371 My goal is to configure a Linux desktop into a windows domain environment. So far I have managed to configure pam_smb to authenticate users to the PDC. So thats good. Now the problem is when user tries to browse a share. At the moment the users has to retype in their domain/userid password every time they access a

Is there a way to run sshd on a windows 2000 server and have ssh clients authenticate to it using domain level authentication? Mike

Hello, In the third party software that we bought, which runs on Solaris 2.8 Server, we use the pam_smb version 1.9.8 to authenticate our users against the NT Domain. Now, our company is migrating from NT Domain to Windows 2000 ADS Domain in native mode. I saw the documention on SAMBA 3.0 (alpha 1-15), and it states that SAMBA 3.0 is compatible with ldap/ADS of Windows 2000. Have you created

We have recently upgraded to : samba-3.0.21 openssl-0.9.7g krb5-1.4.3 openldap-2.3.11 db-4.4.16 cyrus-sasl-2.1.21 m4-1.4.4flex-2.5.31 autoconf-2.59 libiconv-1.9.1 gcc-3.4.2 bison-2.1 automake-1.9 libtool-1.5.22 and have got samba authenticating against our 2003 AD servers, however we now discovered that someone has setup xdm to use pam authentication to the old NT4 domain using xdm.pam and