similar to: netatalk & Sambas' winbind

Hi, Is it from my eyes, or Centos (or for that matters, RHEL) doesn't include netatalk ???? If not, does it bring something else for the same porpous ? Any help would be appreciated. Warm regards, M?rio Gamito

Hi, For a few months i've been using WhiteBox Enterprise Linux. In fact, i've migrated all my companie's servers (about 20) to this RHEL distro like. Well, it's not that i'm not satisfied, but WBEL is a one man show and that causes me some preocupation. And besides, it seems to me that it can't stand up to the rythm RHEL evolves. That's why i'm writing to you,

hi@all i'm using netatalk and samba as fileserver for different clients (OS9,X,WinNT/2K/XP) to create shares, that are visible and accessible for all clients (via afp/smb) i created a folder and made it public in all daemons (atalk, samba) to get a better file handling i'm using the samba feature: vfs object = netatalk but there are still some problems files that are created via afp

Reply-To: Hi When configuring samba there is an option to turn on netatalk-support. I did this, because we need to see the shared on both windows and mac, but I couln't see any difference in sambas behaviour. Netatalk stored the ressource-fork, and some files the Mac-Finder created in Directories calles ".AppleDouble". I hoped, that with netatalk-support samba would handle those

Hi, I'm trying to recompile CentOS stock kernel, and after making my choices (make menuconfig), i run "make" and imediatly get this error (after my signature). Yes, i have the kernel source installed :P Any help would be apreciated. Warm regards, M?rio Gamito [root at tux 2.6.9-5.0.3.EL-i686]# make CHK include/linux/version.h SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h ->

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >

I recently took over a x86_64 CentOS 4.0 server running an "unsupported" kernel. On examining the box it seems that perhaps it is because of the use of xfs and netatalk. I would like to update the box to 4.3. I think I can do away with the netatalk, but doing away with xfs would require a substantial amount of work. Questions: 1: In reading the archive of this list there was a post

Hi. I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. The character ":" in EA name is wrong. The EAs are not seen from clients. smb.conf: [test2] path = /export/test2 writable = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:locking =

since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to go get rid of netatalk these days? is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble extended attributes which are *not* compatible with samba and write them back in the new format? afp.conf: appledouble = ea ea = samba

Take a look at this output from lsof: smbd 11490 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 afpd 31010 0 2u REG 3,3 3207 1136655 auction - envelope.rtf afpd 31010 0 5u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work File L 1 afpd 31010 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 smbd 31386 0 9u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work

Hi all, I'm have a Linux Box running samba and netatalk, and a file system shared with Mac and Windows users. My problem is that when a user in Windows delete a file that have a Macintosh label (color), and later the Windows user put another version of the file with the same name, the Macintosh label still apear (and this is not the behavior that i need). I view in the file system that

I am having difficulty getting Netatalk to authenticate using NT Domain via Winbind. I have Samba successfully installed, and winbindd is working and running. (Tested via wbinfo) I have placed pam_winbind.so in the /usr/lib/security directory, and have installed netatalk with the --with-pam option, but I still cannot seem to get it working. Any help would be appreciated. John Helt Systems

I've just noticed that --with-netatalk and --with-quotas are options to configure for samba. Is anyone using these options on Solaris 7, and what do they do and how well ? I'd really like to display a users quota as "disk size" and their remaining space as "disk free". Is --with-quotas the right way to go about this ? I also run netatalk. Do I need to use

On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > Hi, > I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > > The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > > smb.conf: > path = /export/test1/ > writable = yes > vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr > fruit:locking = netatalk > fruit:encoding = native > streams_xattr:prefix = user.

Client: Dual 1GHz G4 OSX 10.2 Gig-Ethernet Server: Dual 2GHz P4 Linux 2.4.18 Raid-5 1TB Gig-Ethernet With netatalk 1.5.5 I get sustained writes of 66MB/s (yes, megabytes) With samba 2.2.7a I get sustained writes of 15MB/s I've tweaked the settings and ended up with these: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE read raw =

Hi all, Looking for a "best practices" way to share out to both Mac and PC easily. I know Windoze enables the same sharepoint for both the mac and pc shares and there don't seem to be any real "problems" by doing that. However I work in an environment which forces us to utilize Win9x through XP as well as OS 9 through 10.x on the mac side. I need a user friendly way to

Hello, Anyone out there running a production network supporting PC and Macintosh clients using samba and netatalk. we are currently using NT 4.0 with AppleTalk-IP software. Sharing the same files with the Macs and the pc is a must. I read someplace that samba 2.2.2 supports Appletalk. Is this true? Thanks, Joe

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:33:10AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > > On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > >> > >> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > >> > >> smb.conf: > >> path =

hello all... i'm running freebsd 4.8 release on our fileservers. we serve files to over 50 macintosh OS 9 clients, and we use netatalk to do it. However, all our username/password info is managed by the corporate IT dept. and they run Win2000. To avoid having to maintain my own password database, I'd like to use the authentication mechanism built into samba to authenticate our

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:20:54AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:05:33 +0100, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de>: > > iirc you need fruit:encoding = native > > Solved. Thanks! > I'm looking forward to netatalk 3.1.8. > > $ getfattr Mew.txt > # file: Mew.txt > user.com.apple.TextEncoding > user.com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment > >