similar to: My story installing Samba-LDAP PDC (it has a happy ending)

Hello, I have some problems trying to configure a PDC with OpenLDAP backend using Samba 3.0.1. My LDAP server is working fine and has the samba templates. I am able to configure users. The procedure I am using is I first create the user in the LDAP server using posixAccount, shadowAccount, etc. Then, as root, I write smbpasswd -a user and it works fine. I get the same effect if I use

After perusing the Samba 3.x docs and purchasing Terpstra's and Vernooij's excellent Samba-3 Howto, I am still unclear on LDAP authentication. Not a Windows admin so please bear with me. 1) Regarding the Samba schema, is there a tool to extract the Windows client information (sid, etc.) for populating an LDIF? Raymond

> [Samba] Samba3 Printer drivers installation > Andrei Mikhailovsky andrei at arhont.com > Tue Jan 20 11:52:41 GMT 2004 > > > Hello, > > I am having problems installing printer drivers for Samsung ML-4500 > printer, so windows workstation can just fetch them from print$ share. > When I run rpcclient with -d 4 i get the following error: > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys, been trying the x509 patch for ssh from Roumen, it works great. However, I can't figure out couple of things, and been trying to solve it for couple of days already. I'am using OpenSSH_4.7p1-hpn12v19, OpenSSL 0.9.8g with 6.1 version of your patch. The serverside hostkey is configured correctly, to present x509v3-sign-rsa dynowork

Hi, I have a DSP compiler I'm trying to get working in linux with wine. The compiler needs a 32-bit DOS extender. The programme tries to use dos4g.exe or dos4gw.exe by default. The result is: wine shc.exe algoio.c Warning: unprotecting the first 64KB of memory to allow real-mode calls. NULL pointer accesses will no longer be caught. SH SERIES C Compiler Ver. 2.0D

Gunnar, Check (ll -d dirname) to make sure that there is at least x permission for everyone in each directory down the /var/adm/slh/samba/locks path; also, does the STATUS..LCK file exist in the named directory, and if so what are the permissions on it? Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Bakken, Gunnar [mailto:bakkengj@mail.slh.wisc.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:08 PM

Another thing to consider about your feature idea is that the output may be noisy depending on what you were hoping for. SLH tries to mitigate anything that could potentially be a problem and thus it instruments almost every branch, load, and function entry, for example. There isn't a lot of signal about what is really a gadget among the code instrumented by SLH. It really tries to be

Every thing works fine but... Samba 1.9.18 using default (oplocks = True) $ /usr/local/samba/bin/smbstatus -d No path in service weight4 - using /tmp No path in service lj4d - using /tmp No path in service lj3si - using /tmp No path in service lj4si - using /tmp No path in service lyle4 - using /tmp No path in service steve4 - using /tmp No path in service lp - using /tmp No path in service lp2

Yes, there is currently concurrent usage because the Mail spool is NFS Mounted. Here is the current configuration: dovecot -n # 2.1.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.54-server-2.mga3 i686 Mageia 3 base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/ disable_plaintext_auth = no lock_method = dotlock login_greeting = SpamZapper Email ready. login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m

Hola, Daniel: Quizá deberías ser más explícito porque de la información que suministras yo solo te puedo decir que no veo la relación entre los 3 tipos de algoritmos que nombras: - un análisis de componentes principales puede ser una fase previa de los otros dos - hacer un cluster es un tipo de aprendizaje no supervisado, mientras que un clasificador normalmente es utilizado en aprendizaje

Maybe I misunderstand. Each user is only able to access their mailbox from a single connection at a time. Other users can access the NFS Spool from other connections, I think that is what I am calling Concurrent connections. Is that the same definition you have? From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Aki Tuomi Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 10:05 AM To: Albert

for months, we keep fighting issues with smbd (now at released 2.2.6), config is with spoolss, domain logon, and the client in question is an NT4 machine. server is a i386/linux 2.2.19 For a very long time, we thought it was related to oplocks, but now after having them disabled, it still is there. Level 3 Log is as follows: [2002/10/22 17:08:18, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(480) trans

I have, but I will be happy to review it once again. On 12/18/18 2:14 PM, admin wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:06 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH > CHS CISA CISSP: >> >> I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with >> dovecot.? Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have >> been experiencing high CPU use with the two

CREO QUE ESTE TIPO DE CONSULTA, EXCEDE EL PROPÓSITO DE ESTE FORO. El miércoles, 26 de noviembre de 2014, Daniel Carrillo Zapata < daniel.carrillo2 en um.es> escribió: > Hola Isidro, > > mira, te explico mejor: tengo una base de datos con información de > 10 conductores en un recorrido de 30 minutos en coche. Para cada > conductor, se le midió parámetros

I received this from Matt Jockers and it worked! I missed something. How can I now see(display) this list? Hi Riann, There are a couple of ways that you could do this. . . the best approach would probably be to use *grep* instead of *which*, but let me show you both ways. On page 30, replace whales.v <- which(moby.word.v == *whale*) with whale_words <- c(*whale", *whales",

Please keep messages on the list so others can pitch in. _Which_ words do you want to consider identical for the purpose of frequency count? _What_ do you want to plot? B. > On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Riaan Van Der Walt <Riaan.VanDerWalt at nwu.ac.za> wrote: > > Hallo Boris, > I've loaded the Rstem, Snowball. > But I am clueless how to get a list eg. whal* (whale,

Hola de nuevo a todos, me gustaría pediros disculpas por los correos que he enviado. La razón de enviarlos es que pensaba que era también un foro en el que podía plantear cuestiones estadísticas, no solo sobre R en concreto. Siempre es importante aprender algo de todo lo que haces, así que lo que me llevo es el conocimiento de que aquí solo puedo plantear cuestiones de implementación en R, y

In attempting to reactivate my IMAP communications with my Email Spool (NFS Mounted), I have gotten the following while attempting to download the Emails via POP3. Oct 18 08:00:45 ns4 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<aewhale>, method=PLAIN, rip=74.109.213.194, lip=66.207.133.232 Oct 18 08:02:40 ns4 dovecot: pop3(aewhale): Error: Timeout (180s) while waiting for dotlock for transaction

OK, I am attempting to use the userdb connection to facilitate per user migration to Maildir format from mbox. Here's the first user: more /home/dovecot.passwd health:$1$MCtvt/Tz$FmKqU/cbWlBhKnhc5W.Ko.:1152:1152:/home/health:userdb_mail=maildir:~/Maildir The configuration was set up as: userdb passwd { } I changed this to: userdb passwd-file { args = /home/dovecot.conf }

I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with dovecot.? Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have been experiencing high CPU use with the two Dovecot servers. I am not certain why they are not well behaved.? Here is the configuration information. This configuration is currently running at a load average of 17. /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.1.15: