similar to: Can't build CentOS 5.1 kernel from source

Hi all I'm looking for the linux source files for CentOS 5.1 2.6.18-53.el5. To install VirtualBox, I apparently need the kernel sources, and even after installing kernel-devel & kernel-headers via yum I still get an error saying I need the kernel-sources [root at gimbli ~]# ll /usr/src/kernels/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 18 root root 4096 Mar 4 10:57 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5-x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx 1

Hi, I'm having a problem compiling the kernel as a normal user (don't know if not being root is the problem or not). What is ABI? I can compile with the flag --without kabichk, but I don't know if really is that the solution or not. The package build stops at this point: + echo '**** kABI checking is enabled in kernel SPEC file. ****' **** kABI checking is enabled in kernel

Hi Akemi, Thanks for the reply. >Do you mean no src.rpm of your custom kernel? If so, rpmbuild -bs will build >it. The only source rpm I can find is from the CentOS Extras. FIlename makes it appear that you need the 2.6.18-8.1.8 kernel from CentOS Extras: kvm-kmod-36-1.2.6.18_8.1.8.el5.src.rpm If I try to rebuild that with: rpmbuild --rebuild --target=x86_64

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tru Huynh <tru at centos.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:42AM -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> Here is the updated version: >> >> http://centos.toracat.org/kmods/CentOS-4/xfs/SRPMS/ >> >> Please discard the obsoleted ones (I did not bump the version/release >> number). ?Let me know when your binaries are ready for

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2013:0485 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2013-0485.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 38fc59ea17e6fb9838ef53e5e16a7ea67e3c575ff210d01dc29ecedf4602b900 kabi-whitelists-20130129-1.el6.centos.noarch.rpm

I?m trying to build a 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 kernel without kabichk. I have downloaded the sources, installed the compiler, etc and ran the following command rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` --without kabichk --with baseonly --without debug \ --without debuginfo kernel-2.6.spec. I had modified the .SPEC file according to the WIKI page http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel I have NOT

I work with a USB device that is intercepted by the USB HID driver. In order to stop this behavior, the device needs to be added to the HID blacklist (hid-core.c) and a custom kernel needs to be compiled. If I create a CentOS specific patch, it appears I need to create the patch against an already patched source tree (i.e. after running rpmbuild -bp) because other patches exist that add items to

Hi, I would like to announce a set of OCFS2 kABI-tracking kernel module packages for RHEL5, Scientific Linux 5 and CentOS-5 and kernels. These packages have been introduced into the ELRepo testing repository (http://elrepo.org/). You can find these packages at: http://elrepo.org/linux/testing/el5/ The ELRepo project is a community project providing various additional kernel modules for

Hi, I would like to announce a set of OCFS2 kABI-tracking kernel module packages for RHEL5, Scientific Linux 5 and CentOS-5 and kernels. These packages have been introduced into the ELRepo testing repository (http://elrepo.org/). You can find these packages at: http://elrepo.org/linux/testing/el5/ The ELRepo project is a community project providing various additional kernel modules for

On 24/09/2019 20:14, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > >> Am 24.09.2019 um 21:11 schrieb Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org>: >> >> Mainline kernel packages are available from elrepo for el8. Current version is kernel-ml-5.3.x: >> >> https://elrepo.org/linux/kernel/el8/x86_64/RPMS/ <https://elrepo.org/linux/kernel/el8/x86_64/RPMS/> >> >> Is that

Hi, I would like to announce a set of DRBD kABI-tracking kernel module packages for RHEL5, CentOS-5 and Scientific Linux 5 kernels. These packages have been introduced into the ELRepo testing repository (http://elrepo.org/). You can find these packages at: http://elrepo.org/linux/testing/el5/ The ELRepo project is a community project providing various additional kernel modules for Red

On 2020/7/15 ??5:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:31:09AM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote: >> If protected virtualization is active on s390, the virtio queues are >> not accessible to the host, unless VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM has been >> negotiated. Use the new arch_validate_virtio_features() interface to >> fail probe if that's not the case,

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > > >> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: > >> > A couple of days ago I submitted a request to ElRepo and kmod-jfs >

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:22 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > On 10/26/2017 08:01 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > > >> On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at

On Dec 6, 2018, at 17:45, david <david at daku.org> wrote: > > Folks > > I have two USB connected drives, configured as a mirrored-pair in ZFS. It's been working fine UNTIL I updated Centos > from 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64 > to 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 > > The import of the pools didn't happen at boot. When I tried executing: > zpool list > I got

On 10/26/2017 08:01 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:17 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > >> On October 26, 2017 6:31:04 PM EDT, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/18/2017 12:54 PM, H wrote: >>>>> A couple

Hi, When I build a mpt3sas rpm package, I found something interesting: 1. package name is prefixed with kmod- automatically 2. so many requirements are added automatically, most of them are kabi So my question is rpmbuild how to know he is building kernel module package? Based on which condition? Here is mpt3sas.spec: Name: mpt3sas Version: 26.00.00.00 Release: 1 Summary: RHEL

gentle ping. On 2020-07-15 13:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 06:16:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/7/15 ??5:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:31:09AM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote: >>>> If protected virtualization is active on s390, the virtio queues are >>>> not accessible to the host,

I've installed 6.4 on an old T30 ThinkPad, and I'm in the midst of setting it up. I can't seem to get an rpm of Pan for it, nor even to do yum update. Mousing around fedoraproject eventually got me to http:// rpmfusion.org/Configuration/ and from there to downloads for the free, nonfree, and epel packages (along with a caveat that tells you -- *after* you've gotten rpmfusion

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:40 PM, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton at gmail.com> wrote: > I am not sure this would work. It might be able to handle changes in > structure, but what about changes in the accessor functions? function change is not a big deal, take a example, one function referenced in ko, but not exist in new kernel, how could we replace new kernel in this case? This