similar to: Connecting two LANs over a slow link

Like many, I administer multiple LANs connected together using NT trust relationships. This was implemented about 4 years ago. I now have the occasion to consider performing this same task again, but this time, I would like to implement it solely through samba - no Microsoft PDCs anywhere. I have read documentation on samba.org regarding NT-style trust relationships and am now wondering, can I

Hi! Just today, I managed to attach my Win98 client at home to my remote network which is controlled by a Linux samba 2.0.5a server. The TCP/IP connection is working just fine, I'm able to access all services like ftp, telnet, ... The Win98 client is connected to the network using the DialUp-Network. The option "log on to remote network" is activated and as far as I can conclude

Hello, I have a few questions. I have network like this: (A)---------(MS)--------(SS)-------(B) | | inet (C) Ms and SS are linux servers with samba. others are workstations with WinMe. Can I make all subnets and all computers to see all computers on all subnets without using WINS? So A should see SS, B and C. Because between MS and SS is very long network

On 8.2.19. 17:01, jradxl at yahoo.com wrote: > Hello Peter, Hi John, > Your question is similar to my recent question, and I have a similar Ping problem.But yours, with two Tinc networks, is more complex than mine. > > All I can say, and I hope it helps, is that in my case I have found my Ubuntu Tinc Server nodes Ah, forgot to mention that I use Debian 9 here. > do not like

Hello, I have a few questions. I have network like this: (A)---------(MS)--------(SS)-------(B) | | inet (C) Ms and SS are linux servers with samba. others are workstations with WinMe. Can I make all subnets and all computers to see all computers on all subnets without using WINS? So A should see SS, B and C. Because between MS and SS is very long network

Peter, I think I agree with your answers to my comments. But it is so difficult to track the questions and answers when written! I've created a network diagram of my setup, and it may help!I'll attached the PDF to this email, but it might get stripped. If so, do email me directly. John   1. Problem with connecting another subnet (jradxl at yahoo.com)   2. Re: Problem with connecting

I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and inheritance on the shares as it's been constantly causing issues. This server is both a file server and a AD DC. The current problem I am facing is the permissions of the

Hi all, I'm trying to do the following (ASCII art diagram viewable in fixed-width font at end of message): Take 2 private LANs, seperated by the internet, and bridge them by creating a bridge from 2 ethernet devices and a ppp interface tunneled over ssh between the two linux boxes concerned. The setup on each of the two networks is nearly identical, and is as follows: The network has

On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from > 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since > then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and > inheritance on the shares as it's been constantly causing issues. This > server is both a file

On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >>> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since >>> then I just haven't managed to

hi how much different iptables are in 7 from 6 I'm just learning, I expected that since IFs belong to the same zone traffic between them would pass, be forwarded without any extra settings/configuration but, I'm wrong it turns out. Am I missing something and there actually is a simple way, designed to make that routing between lans/interfaces just work - a one liner, one

> > Hello Heinz, > > > > Am 13.03.2015 um 18:26 schrieb Heinz H?lzl: > > > i did some tests wit samba 4.2 as a ADS DC on arch linux. > > > On a Win8.1 client i can do local logins as every user, > > > i can login via RDP as local user, but i am not able to > > > login as a domain user via RDP. > > > After the loginscreen, appears

Hi all, I got a new assignment today. My task is to install LDAP instead of NIS in our network, consisting of Solaris, Linux and W2k. Our actual setup is like this: Accounts are kept on a Solaris-server and served with samba and NFS. Two PCs serve as PDCs, running NOT samba on unix but a real W2k. Special MS-PAM-modules on the Solaris-server are used to synchronise accounts and passwords with

Hello Peter, Your question is similar to my recent question, and I have a similar Ping problem.But yours, with two Tinc networks, is more complex than mine. All I can say, and I hope it helps, is that in my case I have found my Ubuntu Tinc Server nodes do not like being specified as a address on the same network as the local LANsSo I have a specific network for the Tinc Server nodes, and in this

James: (Again someone correct me if I'm wrong) PAM allows local access to the Samba machine as well as authenticating Samba users. Winbind *only* allows for Samba access. This is why I chose *not* to use PAM in my setup. I don't want normal users to have local logon access to *MY* servers. <evil grin> With Winbind, you don't need PAM at all. If you're planning on

With a single server, settings "security = server" and "password server = pdc1 pdc2', I can successfully authenticate against two entirely different PDCs depending on which order I put the two machines in the 'password server' list. Is there someway of forcing clients from either domain to authenticate against the 'right' pdc, regardless of the order in the

Hi Igor, Once again, thanks for keeping up with me. I have been migrating my master ldap server to 2.1 version so to keep it the same with the PDCs version of LDAP. Now they are the same. I have rectified such that "wbinfo -u" on both sides worked now. I am made "net rpc trustdom list" worked. It was not working before. I had to put "stuadmin = root" in the

The interesting part is that PAM nor the SMB auth plugin for Apache requires you to be a member of the domain. However, the caveat with pam_smb_auth is that you have to have a unix account for every windows user you want to authenticate. I guess the behavior I'm trying to achieve is the one achieved with the Apache plugin: 1) Doesn't require you to be a member of the domain 2)

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

Hello tinc mailing list! Nice to be accepted here :) So I've been using tinc for a while just for itself and now I would like to use it to route to another network. To be exact I have two tinc networks with a "central node" that is connected to both tincs: tiutl: 172.16.0.0/24 tiosp: 172.16.1.0/24 I'm doing that because I can then do fancy firewalling on that central node.