Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Samba doesn't appear in browse list"
2004 Jan 21
2
winbind hang
All;
I'm having an odd problem with winbind.
I just installed Samba 3.0.2 pre1 on a Solaris 9 server.
smbd/nmbd/winbindd all start ok.
But when it first starts, if I try "wbinfo -u", it hangs. As does "getent
passwd". This will continue for the first couple hours after a restart. Then,
things will suddenly start to work, and be fine for the rest of the time. Until I
have
2004 Jul 23
2
"Duplicate workgroup names in browse list" problem reappeared in 3.0.5
Starting from version 3.0.2 (or .3?) there were a misfeature that caused
workgroup names to show up as duplicates in workstations' browse lists. Fix
for this didn't reach into 3.0.5-pre1, but rc1 had this fixed.
Today I upgraded 3.0.5-rc1 to 3.0.5-2 (FC2 binary rpm from samba.org) and
the problem reappeared.
To be more spesific, the problem appears when there are more that one
workgroup
2016 Mar 06
3
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
...
> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \
> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \
> -Di386 \
> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \
> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm
> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \
> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \
> -Di386 \
>
2016 Mar 07
2
Syslinux 6.04-pre1
On 06.03.2016 18:23, poma wrote:
> On 06.03.2016 16:47, poma wrote:
>> ...
>>> nasm -f elf -Ox -g -F dwarf -DDATE_STR="''" \
>>> -DHEXDATE="0x56dc3c62" \
>>> -Di386 \
>>> -I/tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ \
>>> -l ldlinux.lsr -o ldlinux.o -MP -MD ./.ldlinux.o.d /tmp/syslinux-6.04-pre1/core/ldlinux.asm
>>>
2014 Jun 11
3
Acceptable version mismatch between syslinux 6.0N's MBR/ldlinux.sys and *.c32?
Hi there,
first, thanks a lot for syslinux!
I'm aware that one can't mix syslinux 4's MBR + ldlinux.sys with
syslinux 6's COM32R modules. Fair enough. Now, I need to know how
strong this "versions *must* match" requirement is when dealing with
different versions of syslinux 6.x. E.g.
* MBR and ldlinux.sys installed by syslinux 6.03-pre1
* all *.c32 modules
2003 Oct 31
1
samba3 and CUPS: lpoptions does not work
Hi,
I have set up a CUPS queue in the samba server with specific lpoptions
(actually, it's a queue to print 2-up on an HP LaserJet4300 printer. I used
lpoptions -d NX2-118 -o number-up=2). Everything works as expected when I
print from the Unix side.
However, when I print to the corresponding samba queue, the options
specified through lpoptions are ignored (i.e. the prints come out as 1-up
2016 Oct 26
2
[PATCH] Fix for crash with certain EFIs
> >> Let me double check what the status of 6.04-pre1 is. Maybe this patch
> >> is not necessary at all!
>
> OK, I have verified beyond doubt that 6.04-pre1 (prebuilt from
> kernel.org) indeed does fix the issue on the affected systems.
>
> Again, sorry for the churn!
>
> Best Regards,
> - Chris
OK, so, from the user's point of view, the
2018 Dec 03
2
fixing debian's hd-media image
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:29 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > _ target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG
> >
> > I don't think that exists? (see list below)
>
>
> In our "first test" (simple boot prompt), we created
> "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG". In our "second test" we _added_
>
2003 Dec 06
1
recode{car} does not work as expected?
Hi to all,
I am having a problem when using recode from the car package. I have
a variable that is char and when I use recode to create a new
variable that is supposed to be numeric I get a factor variable. Here
is the code I am using:
> FCI$PRE1 <- recode (PRE1RES, " c('C', 'c')=1 ; else = 0 ;
as.factor.result=FALSE ")
So, if I understand correctly the recode
2016 Oct 20
2
[PATCH] Fix for crash with certain EFIs
> Thank you all.
>
> It looks like -mno-red-zone flag is already in master branch since
> commit 7d70885d, but it seems it is applied to all EFI builds.
Finally we are on the same page.
>
> IIUC, the problem only affects efi64 builds.
Have you actually tested efi32 (ia32) builds?
>
> So here's the modification of my patch to only apply -mno-red-zone
>
2016 Oct 20
2
[PATCH] Fix for crash with certain EFIs
> Let me double check what the status of 6.04-pre1 is. Maybe this patch
> is not necessary at all!
Just a reminder:
_ 6.04-pre1 can be downloaded from kernel.org, and it includes
pre-built binaries, so no "make" anything is needed (and to some
degree, not always recommended).
_ In many cases, testing with pre-built official binaries is desired,
so others can attempt to
2008 Apr 02
1
Network UPS Tools version 2.2.2-pre1 released
Network UPS Tools version 2.2.2-pre1 has been released.
http://www.networkupstools.org/
Direct access:
- Download: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/testing/nut-2.2.2-pre1.tar.gz
- News: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/testing/new-2.2.2-pre1.txt
- ChangeLog: http://www.networkupstools.org/source/2.2/testing/ChangeLog
Arnaud and the NUT team
--
Linux / Unix Expert R&D -
2013 Jul 18
3
Efi64 boot fail during download from kernel and initrd via http
On Sat, 13 Jul, at 07:58:21PM, Michael Szerencsits wrote:
> I use VMWare Player 5.02 build 1031769 on Win2k8 R2 64bit.
> I found that the last working version is 6.02-pre1 but beginning
> with pre2 and also latest version 6.02-pre5 it fail to boot.
Are you sure that 6.02-pre1 worked? There was only one commit between
6.02-pre1 and 6.02-pre2 and it shouldn't have affected anything at
2006 Sep 02
1
About menu.c32 from SYSLINUX 3.30-pre1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
When I tried to use the menu.c32 from SYSLINUX 3.30-pre1, the simple
menu have different background color than that in 3.20.
1. use the menu.c32 from SYSLINUX 3.30-pre1, the simple menu is:
http://lfod.nchc.org.tw/stick/syslinux/syslinux_menu_3.30_pre1.jpg
2. use the menu.c32 from SYSLINUX 3.20, the simple menu is:
2010 Mar 11
1
Recovery console doesn't work in chain.c32 3.85 or 3.86-pre1
The Windows recovery console doesn't work with chain.c32 3.85 or 3.86-pre1.
COM32 chain.c32
APPEND cmldr=/cmldr
Initially reported by cdob at:
http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=10487#entry94001
It did work fine with the: "chain.c32: Handle nonlinear logical partitions"
patch.
The following patch broke the recovery console hack:
chain.c32: add option to set hidden
2016 Mar 05
2
build problems with 6.04-pre1
hello everybody,
apologies if I'm missing something here
Just tried to build 6.04-pre1 test version with:
make bios installer
and found some problems all (seemingly) related to inaccurate paths in
various Makefiles.
I enclose a complete patch at the end of this email, which details the
problems I found and how they got fixed for me.
As an example, this is the first error I got:
2013 Jun 26
1
Syslinux 6.00 released
On 26.06.2013 06:38, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Matt,
>
> Du meintest am 25.06.13:
>
>>> Not really... let's just document "make bios".
>
>> There's preliminary documentation in doc/building.txt.
>
> And "make bios" has run without any problem on my machine.
?
CFLAGS=-Werror make bios
?
/tmp/syslinux-6.01-pre1/core/bios.c: In
2013 Jul 08
3
[5.xx-6.01] broken PXE with HTTP
On 07/05/2013 01:02 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
>
> 5.00 [pxelinux.0] OK 5.01 [pxelinux.0] OK 5.02-pre1
> [pxelinux.0] OK 5.02-pre2 [pxelinux.0] OK 5.02-pre3 [pxelinux.0]
> BAD (freeze, no error messages, 100% CPU used)
>
> 5.10-pre1 [pxelinux.0] BAD (freeze, no error messages, 100% CPU
> used) 5.10-pre2 [pxelinux.0] BAD (Failed to load: ldlinux.c32,
2019 Jun 08
2
PXELINUX gets stuck when receiving non-PXE traffic
On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
>> the PXELINUX log line is
>> printed (PXELINUX 6.04 lwIP 6.04-pre3 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 H. Peter
>> Anvin et al),
>
> (snip)
>
> FWIW, the official binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 are not good
> for troubleshooting.
>
> Is the same behavior present when testing with other versions? I would
2020 Jul 23
2
extlinux - Failed to load ldlinux.c32
Thank you for your answer. I need to correct some information from my
previous post: booting from `/` did not work either. I just assumed it
did based on previous experience. But with that successful build on
development branch, it did not either.
> I would suggest trying first the official binaries that are already
> included in the official distribution archive (6.03-pre1). Let me