Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "FYI: Solaris 9 profiles binary core dumping"
2003 Dec 03
1
logon path question
This link:
http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#LOGONPATH
States that:
"Windows clients can sometimes maintain a connection to the [homes] share,
even though there is no user logged in. Therefore, it is vital that the logon
path does not include a reference to the homes share (i.e. setting this
parameter to \%N\%U\profile_path will cause problems)."
I am still
2003 Nov 15
1
Profile Funniness on a Solaris 9 PDC
I'm running Samba 3 as a PDC on a Solaris 9 box. I am able to create profiles
and add stuff to the profile (by logging in for the first time), however
nothing ever seems to get deleted from the profile.
For example, if I remove both the local profile and the profile as it exists
on the PDC, and then login the new profile gets created perfectly. If I then
add a "Temporary
2003 Nov 04
1
Solaris, Samba-3.0.1pre1 Compile error
Hello all, I currently run Samba 3.0 on a Solaris 9 machine in a production
environment. I'm happy with it.
I tried compiling samba-3.0.1pre1 using ./configure --with-ldap=no.
However when it gets to linking bin/tdbbackup it fails. This is the error it
gives:
Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude
-I/scratch/build/samba-3.0.1pre1/source/include
2003 Nov 19
3
Syncing time for non-Admin logons? - net time \\superserver /set /yes
I have in my smb.conf file the following entries:
time server = yes
and
logon script = startup.bat
Where logon script is as follow:
-----start script -----
NET TIME \\SUPERSERVER /SET /YES
# Here we map network drives to shares on the Samba Server
echo Mapping Network Drives to Samba Server Theremin
net use s: \\superserver\scratch
net use r: \\superserver\share
2003 Nov 17
2
UNIX paths vs UNC names in [profile]
Alright, I can be a bit thick sometimes, but by RTFM or other documentation
I've solved a problem.
ISSUE
I had been having problems with profiles, I use using the following profile:
<edited>
[global]
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
local master = yes
security = user
domain logons = yes
logon path = \\%N\%u\profiles
logon drive = H:
logon home = \\%L\%U
logon script =
2003 Nov 14
0
Test page failed to print. Would you to like ......? Access is denied.
Hello all, I've gotten the printing subsytem almost working - I think. I am
able to install my print drivers to the server IAW the instructions found
here: http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/printing.html
The drivers are being installed to /etc/samba/drivers/W32X86 IAW
/etc/samba/smb.conf by following the instructions above
This line specifically seems to do it:
[print$]
path =
2003 Nov 19
0
PDC recognizing Domain machines: No problem, only Question
I understand that when we join a machine to the domain we get entries in both
/etc/passwd and /etc/samba/smbpasswd (config specific). I would like to ask
if there is a point at which a PDC doesn't not recognize a machine as
belonging to the domain.
BACKGROUND
In my smb.conf I have the line:
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
So that in /var/log I get machine specific log files. All is
2003 Nov 18
2
printer.tdb (tdb_oob len errors) and Quirkiness: Solaris 9, Samba 3.0.0
I set up printing IAW:
http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/printing.html
I've confirmed the drivers are being installed to /etc/samba/drivers/W32X86.
Yet I am unable to print even a test page. I get the following error:
"Test page failed to print. Would you like to view the print trouble shooter
for assistance? Access is denied."
And I get the following errors in my samba
2003 Nov 19
0
Solution to a Problem - Adding domain users as local Admins fails
I thought I'd post an observation about a problem I solved so that others
might benefit. I must admit I was struggling with the issue for a couple of
days, and solved it, though I'm not sure exactly what solved it but I'll
share the observations nonetheless, for the benefit of others.
PROBLEM BEHAVIOUR
I was unable to view domain users as the local admin, even if I authenticated
2003 Nov 20
2
What is vuid?
I'm getting the following errors in my error logs:
ERROR! vuid 100 did not map to a valid vuser struct!
At the time this error was being created I was trying to add a domain user as
a local admin. I was trying to get the browse list of domain users up, but
being denied.
Cheers
Jeff
--
Jeff Gardiner [ gardiner@nospam.imaging.robarts.ca ]
System Administrator - Imaging Research
2003 Nov 18
3
Samba PDC - Solaris 8 or 9??
If anyone has Samba setup to run as a PDC with Solaris 8 or 9 could you
drop me a line? I have a few questions I would like ask. Our shop is
looking at trying to implement this option with our SMB master. I didnt
want to clutter up the list with more than one request.
--
Thank you
Todd Johnson
==============================================
= Steven ?Todd? Johnson =
=
2003 Nov 20
1
kudos to the samba team for samba3
Just wanted to say kudos to the samba team for a great job on samba 3.
Im still reading up on all the nice features with samba 3, but so far, I
really like it.
Just wanted to say great job!
Jason
2003 Nov 19
3
Power users on Samba 3.0.1.
Good Afternoon,
How do I set my domain users to became Power Users on the workstations?
Is there a way to map unix group "x" on the domain to became nt group
"Power Users"? I did some research and I found someone mentioning "take
domain users from the users group, and add it to the power user group"
but my w2k does not list "Domain Users" under
2004 Jan 12
1
Another problem with Win2k logins...
Hi all,
After recovering the former SID that I hadn't had in mind while changing the Linux distro (thanks to Thomas for his help), now I still have some problems. I can't still get any user to login but the ones that must be in cache in the clients (thanks again Thomas).
So, I'll give you the logs to see if anybody detects something strange...
The users can perform a 'smbclient -L
2015 Mar 10
1
aio_pthread on Debian?
Hello Volker,
Thank you for the reply.
I've seen your name mentioned several times against this topic :-)
>What effect do you have in mind exactly? Read/write is done
>asynchronously these days without that module as long as the
>build detected pthreads.
This is the thing... it looks like the Debian packages (stable + back port) are built without the --with-aio-support (at least
2014 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] Machine Code for different architectures
Hi Patrik,
Thanks for this note. It's encouraging to read there has been some
provision made for non-8-bit bytes. I'm not a compiler/backend expert,
(although maybe I'll need to be soon!), so I won't look at the patches
right now, however may at some stage in the future myself or colleague
may request these patches from yourself.
Yes, our 24-bit architectures have non-power-of-2
2007 Jul 14
1
Annoying semi-bug in flac
Dear all,
I use flac a lot and find it really useful. However, there is one slight issue that keeps bugging me.
When encoding/checking files with long filenames, you get output like this (usually much longer):
30 Gardiner, John Eliot Monteverdi Choir, English Baroque Soloists - 30 Recitative Und sie kamen eilend.flac: ok
21 Gardiner, John Eliot Monteverdi Choir, English Baroque Soloists - 21
2005 May 04
1
lmer error:flist must be a non-empty list
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could give me advice regarding using the lmer
command in lme4 package to do logistic regression (mixed effects model).
I use the following command
lmer(ISH ~ArrayPathology2, random=~1|PatientID, data=HSDB4.noNA,
family="binomial")
where ISH is outcome(0 or 1), ArrayPathology2 is the variable of
interest(factor), PatientID is random effect(factor), and
2014 Sep 09
3
[LLVMdev] Machine Code for different architectures
Hi Johnny,
Thanks for this - particularly the tip about cfe-dev. I'm currently
trying to coerce lldb to debug these type of architectures (our
current toolchain already outputs good dwarf info). However, I'm
struggling since lldb has just assumes that the size of a byte is
universally 8-bits. At some stage, I *think* at some stage we'd like to
derive a compiler, from the "same
2004 Apr 05
4
Redhat 9 OVER, Fidora Support, comments please.
Hi *ers,
I recently got an Email from Redhat about the dropping of support for Redhat
9 on the 30 of April and that Fedora Project is the recommended future,
otherwise, RedHat enterprise ($$$).
Considering this, I would like some feed back on the Fedora Project from
users who may be using it, and how its going with Asterisk? Are there any
problems?
Is the Asterisk development team got Fedora