similar to: access samba 3.0 shares from Win2K, Win3K, WinXPProf. using netbios name

Hi all, I am using samba 3.5.8 on a linux machine. I am not able to join the domain of a windows 2003 server in ADS mode. I am getting the following error message: # /usr/local/samba/bin/net ads join -U Administrator%password -I 10.25.66.71 Failed to join domain: failed to find DC for domain ABCDOM.PQR.COM # I am not sure what the issue here. It works absolutely fine when I try to join the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry to mention the "opposition" here, but I have a family member's laptop to protect, and I'm not allowed to upgrade it to Linux. What's the current best recommendation? Thanks, MArtin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVHbCMAAoJEAF3yXsqtyBl4I8P/AsvH+cyGcG9PDtL8I091WJc

hi there, i begin to install shadow copy VFS mod function in samba 3.0.24-6etch9, after i see the same function at win2003srv, i think it could be very useful, if i gonna make it under DEB, but at the moment i'm really get stucked, i try to describe what's the point now; 1 - load shadow_copy mod in smb.conf vfs objects = shadow_copy 2 - install shadow copy client in WinXPProf 3 -

Hello I am currently setting up a new domain structure at work, and am trying to set up samba to authenticate against my Active directory domain. What I am having trouble doing is joining the Linux system to the domain. The system is running Redhat 8.0, no updates with samba-3.0.0beta3 Here is the error I get [2003/07/29 09:32:53, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(190) got

the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that comes through yum. everything is up to date. i am hesitant to install a new package manually as that could cause other compatibility issues? is there another way to test the configuration on the server? On 21/10/2016 01:07, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 10/20/2016 om 7:38 PM schreef Matthew Broadhead: >> do i need to provide

do i need to provide more information? On 19/10/2016 14:49, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > /var/log/maillog showed this > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtpd[1298]: 7599A2C19C6: > client=unknown[127.0.0.1] > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/cleanup[1085]: 7599A2C19C6: > message-id=<edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk> > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/qmgr[1059]:

is there something more i need to be doing my end? On 25/10/2016 09:11, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > are there any instructions or tests i can make to check the sieve > configuration? or does the magic all happen internally and there are > no settings to change? > > On 21/10/2016 10:22, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >> the server is using CentOS 7 and that is the package that

Op 19-10-2016 om 13:47 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > i am not 100% sure how to give you the information you require. > > my current setup in /etc/postfix/master.cf is > flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d > ${recipient} > so recipient would presumably be user at domain.tld? or do you want the > real email address of one of our users? is there

Dear All I have a CentOS 6.3 machine. I am trying to setup DNS BIND setup in that machine. It is having a static global IP. I have done lot of reading , google search and tried all possible option, but still not able to resolve the issue. My named.conf looks as below. * * * // named.conf // // Provided by Red Hat bind package to configure the ISC BIND named(8) DNS // server as a caching only

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1667 Summary: sshd slow connect with 'UseDNS yes' Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Now I am following you. FYI [root at ns1 network-scripts]# systemctl start firewalld [root at ns1 network-scripts]# systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: inactive (dead) since Wed 2015-11-25 17:20:14 SGT; 24s ago Process: 2865 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/firewalld --nofork

I am trying to install Firewalld. I am using CENTOS 7. Please help me to solve the error. [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl enable firewalld [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl start firewalld [root at ns1 httpd]# systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: inactive (dead) since Thu

I don''t know what has happened because know I can''t even get this guest booting. The guest conf I think is correct: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-8.1.4.el5xen" builder=''linux'' memory = 384 name = "ns1" vcpus = 1 #vif = [ ''mac=FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF , ip=139.185.48.214, ''bridge=xenbr1'' ] vif = [ '''',

Hi all, Today we have had a strange problem that has taken down our website, we understand what happened but not why so I am hoping someone has seen this before. We have our web servers (web1 web2 web3 ..... web10) mounting an NFS share (/export/data) from server nfs1. On the web server side we use autofs in the format nfs-dedicated:/export/data where nfs-dedicated is an alias in our

Hello all, I am trying to match some conections using u32 but I tryed this: [root@ns1 ~]# tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 0/0 match ip dst 0/0 match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:10 RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument We have an error talking to the kernel [root@ns1 ~]# I have this class at device eth1: [root@ns1 ~]# tc class show dev eth1 class

Samba organizers might want to look into this: [ns1:~] dig 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28005 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

I'm a bit baffled by this and I'm looking for ideas... background: two DNS servers (ns1 & ns2)(64bit CentOS 5.8) one email server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & postfix 2.3.3) one nagios server (64bit CentOS 5.8 & nagios 3.3.1) situation: - all servers configured to use both DNS servers for lookups - ns1 server down for hardware problem - nagios alerts that smtp on email server taking

Some lists and emails are distributed via ns1.samba.org. For those of you that use ORBS, you'll find it is blacklisted now. There is no mention of it on the website and it doesn't return a positive when you enter it for testing but it has slipped into the ORBS blacklist somewhere. Samba.org admins may wish to force all ns1 outbound email via another netblock, bringing it up to ORBS only

greetings on a simple CentOS 4 DNS server install i have the below info. crontab -l "shows nothing" pico /etc/crontab shows... SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAILTO=root HOME=/ # run-parts 01 * * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.hourly 02 4 * * * root run-parts /etc/cron.daily 22 4 * * 0 root run-parts /etc/cron.weekly 42 4 1 * * root run-parts /etc/cron.monthly i

I have an operational need to disable TLSv1.3 due to inadequate support to exclude certain ciphers. Much to my dismay, the `ssl_protocols` had been renamed and re-functionalized into `ssl_min_protocol`. Now, there is no way to exclude a specific group of one or more TLS versions. For a new bug report, I think we need two new settings: * `ssl_tls13_ciphersuite` and * `ssl_tls10_cipher`