similar to: No subject

Hi Raymond, I also struggled 3 days to set up a direct connection between a RH7.3 box and a WinME box with a crossover cable for experiment and met with frustration. The setup of WinME box has no problem and it can connect to other Win boxes for file sharing. IP Address RH7.3 192.168.0.1 WinME 192.168.0.2 Ping started connecting but both boxes can't see each another. I also doubt

[This is a copy of the contents of Debian bug report #147842.] Package: rsync Version: 2.5.5-0.2 Severity: normal Cause ----- - rsync forks a child which in turn forks a grandchild in main.c:do_recv(). - Diagnostics written by the grandchild need to be read by the child using read_error_fd() to be handled properly (with the end result being that they are seen by the user running rsync). -

Hi Tinc Mailing-Group, I am a bit stuck with firewalling rules at the moment. Maybe someone could please advise me a good rc.firewall script to use on my setup. If anyone runs an ipchains firewall script on their linux box which is ALSO running tinc, could they please mail it to me, for my perusal. I have tinc pre3 set up and working on my systems, however I can only get it to work if I set the

Dear Tinc Experts, I have been struggling for some time now, with Tinc pre3, and firewall rulesets and routing. I did once manage to get Tinc to work okay in a test-bed environment. I then tried to set it up for a 'real-life' setup and cannot get it to work properly. My real-life setup looks like this: Network A: 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.7 tap1 device gateway >

To all those that wanted to know how I was filtering particular ICMP packets here is a few snippets from my firewall script which is based on one by Ian Hall-Beyer. I hope this helps you get started. Also note the output of the command: ipchains -h icmp Shawn Mitchell mentioned blocking all ICMP echos and especially broadcast echos. Perhaps he''d care to elaborate with a similar

I just recently installed OpenSSH 2.5.1p1 on a RH6.2 box (kernel 2.2.17). I run ipchains to do packet filtering, allowing incoming connections only to 22 and 80 (and some other ports for specific machines). I was able to run prior versions of openssh in this fashion (I've run it from the first release, I think). Upon installing 2.5.1p1 I found that my attempts to connect hang, here is ssh

Hello David, After some experiments and discussions I came to the following result concerning private NT-Box connecting to a LAN via ipchains and using all NETBIOS services (incl. domain-logon): Cross-subnet browsing with NETBIOS could only be done by a local master browser in the private net. I first thought of using Samba on the Linux router for that. But the Samba service would have to use

I figured this out -- looks like 2.5.1p1 is now using ports < 1024 on the client side (wasn't before?). I had a ipchains rule to allow ACK packets to 1024:65535, which was good enough for <= 2.3.0p1 : #allow only ACK tcp packed ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i eth0 -s any/0 --dport 1024:65535 -p tcp ! -y So I added the following : #allow return from ssh connections ipchains -A input -j

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com [216.102.46.4]) by blues.jpj.net (right/backatcha) with SMTP id VAA15167 for <trevor@JPJ.NET>; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:17:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 28179 invoked from network); 27 Jul 1999 19:14:06 -0000 Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (216.102.46.4) by lists.securityfocus.com

I guess you are in what I think of as "Newbie Hell." It sounds like you are learning linux like a lot of people, all by yourself. That's how I did it, and it is maddening and worse, very time consuming. The important thing is not to keep hitting your head against the brick wall over and over. So, what to do. First, I would join a linux email support group. I belong to a very good

I have tried to replace these lines from ipchains to work with shorewall. # /NFS requires 111/tcp (sunrpc/portmapper) and *all* UDP ports./ # ipchains -A input -p tcp -s $SUBNET -i eth0 -d 0/0 111 -j ACCEPT ipchains -A input -p udp -s $SUBNET -i eth0 -d 0/0 -j ACCEPT # /These ports are required by bootp, tftpd, and PXE./ # /There are also a handful of udp ports that need to/ # /be open,

Just responding in case this may be of help to somebody with firewalling issues. Not sure if this is off on a tangent to the original question... Here are three different forms of common firewall scripts and ways of getting SIP to work behind them. The third one has some additional stuff beyond just SIP although I can't remember why I wrote it that way. I've been having no fun using

Hi, I had installed squid with ntlm authentication and content filtering from this tutorial: http://www.howtoforge.com/dansguardian-with-multi-group-filtering-and-squid-with-ntlm-auth-on-debian-etch. Next to last point is firewall configuration by ipmasq but I have installed shorewall. This is content of I89tproxy.rul file: #!/bin/sh # # redirect http requests to non-local hosts to the

Hi, My friend uses ipchains with kernel 2.4.21 :) It''s funny but it''s true. The problem is that he marks the packets and after this the tc filter doesn''t catch them. ipchains -A input -s 192.168.1.41/28 -j ACCEPT -m 0x2 -t 0xff 0x2 ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.1.41/28 -j MASQ -m 0x2 ipchains -A input -s 192.168.1.240 -j ACCEPT -m 0x3 ipchains -A forward -s

Hi folks... I'm configuring Firewall in the server running Conectiva Linux 6.0 (Brazil) and I already configured to accept connections in the ports: netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-dgm 138/tcp # NETBIOS Datagram Service netbios-dgm 138/udp netbios-ssn 139/tcp

---- "Bacchus 13" <bacchus13@zdnetonebox.com> wrote: > There used to be a project called FAAC but I presume it's gone. Simply, WRONG INFORMATION! It's not gone but the source only publisized. The same tactics as Lame's. Sorry, the FAAC project team. http://sourceforge.net/projects/faac ___________________________________________________________________ To get

Hallo, you are probably right that "the estimated mean or difference in means depending on whether it was a one-sample test or a two-sample test" should be rephrased to "the estimated mean or difference in means depending on whether it was a one-sample test, two-sample test or two sample paired test" Cheers Petr > -----Original Message----- > From: Samuel Granjeaud

Hi, i have a following problem. Looks like this ROUTER --------------DEF.GWa aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa | DEF.GWb bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb | ---------------- -------------------

Hello all, I''m using iproute2 + ipchains and have a question about locally generated packets. I have noticed that I have no problem marking packets in the input chain from sources other than my router. These packets are marked and routed exactly as I expect. Now supposing I want to mark particular outbound packets which are locally generated. The only solution I have found so far

Hi ; +--------+ +-----------+ +--------+ | server |---------- | linux box |---------------------| Client | +--------+ +-----------+ +--------+ MY script: tc-htb3 qdisc del dev eth1 root ipchains -F tc-htb3 qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 10: htb default 20 r2q 40 tc-htb3 class add dev eth1 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb