similar to: Strange auth issue - non-domain member succeeds - domain members fail

Hello, we're trying to setup a platform with authenticated SMTP with exim and relying on dovecot as auth agent. We've read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/EximAndDovecotSASL and so made the changes mentioned there, also setting auth_mechanisms = plain login in conf.d/10-auth.conf . With this setup, we're able to use AUTH LOGIN method on an SMTP session, but using AUTH PLAIN

Hi, I'm writing a c++ wrapper around ssh for KDE, mainly for use in a sftp client. My problem is when starting ssh with the sftp subsystem openssh gives no indication that password authentication succeeded. This makes it difficult for my wrapper to determine if the connection succeeded. Now determining it didn't succeed can be done by checking for another password prompt. The

Some background... We use AMI and AsyncAGI to be able to receive events about calls (and other Asterisk details) and control it from our application. Works great and have about 100 sites (some newer, some older) without issues. I was notified this morning about a customer who had something strange happen and I can't explain it. Asterisk 16.23.0 and PJSIP. Call comes into Asterisk. Asterisk

Folks - With Dovecot 1.0.7, we're seemingly unable to authenticate users for out-going SMTP access who are not residing directly within the main system passwd/shadow files. (I.e. the users seeded within our non-system "dovecot" userdbs & passwd files have no "smtp-auth" joy! (Ye olde "Relaying denied. Proper authentication required") I've mucked around

Hi, I administrate a server (debian etch) on which runs samba, version 3.0.24-6et. Everything worked fine until today. I tried to logon on the server via a clientmachine (win2k, winxp), but i got an error, "System cannot logon because domain not reachable". (it is possible to ping the server and to establish a shortcut (to logon) to the server - that works). I have no idea what

On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:59:16 -0600 Paul Klapperich via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have a FreeNAS 9.3 server running Samba Version 4.3.6 and a bunch of > Windows and Linux clients. Everything's been running fine for a while > and nothing changed on the server. > > Recently (Jan 27th) some of the Archlinux clients updated from a 4.8.x > kernel to a 4.9.x

Hi, I can't seem to overcome an odd problem connecting to a directory share exported by a Win2K (Pro) workstation from my RH Linux 9 system. I was able to accomplish this successfully with Samba 2.2.7 (using mount -t smbfs ...). With that configuration, however, I was unable to get Windows clients to connect to shares exported by the Linux box, so I upgraded to Samba 3.0.4. Under Samba 3 I

Dear all, I've a real strange problem with one of my Samba-servers. Most of the time a lot of users get the message about "trust relationship failure" when trying to access the share on this server. Below you find part of a log where the user can access the share and a few seconds later it's no longer possible. "net ads testjoin" shows that join of the samba-server

Hi, people. Allow me to chat a tiny bit on two vectorisation-related matters, in the context of R. I'm curious about if the following ideas have ever been considered, and rejected already. First is about using the so-called Duff's device for partially unrolling loops. I did not overly check in R sources, and am not familiar with them anyway, but the only usage I saw is within

I have a FreeNAS 9.3 server running Samba Version 4.3.6 and a bunch of Windows and Linux clients. Everything's been running fine for a while and nothing changed on the server. Recently (Jan 27th) some of the Archlinux clients updated from a 4.8.x kernel to a 4.9.x kernel. Again, things ran fine. Then on Jan 30th around 2am the Archlinux clients using 4.9.x kernels and utilizing mount.cifs to

Very well. Here is the affected smb.conf. ------ [global] server min protocol = NT1 server max protocol = SMB3 interfaces = 127.0.0.1 10.0.0.8 bind interfaces only = yes encrypt passwords = yes dns proxy = no strict locking = no oplocks = yes deadtime = 15 max log size = 51200 max open files = 2830016 logging = file load printers = no

In order to run some performance tests on optimization tools, I want to be able to avoid the use of swap memory. In *nix systems, at least Linux ones, I can issue a 'sudo swapoff -a' command and use just the RAM available. If I don't do this, at some point swap will be used, the disk goes ballistic and the machine is unresponsive because it is thrashing data to the swap. I

Hi there! I want to use sambe to create a share on my linux server. This share is a directory on my server, which should look for my WINXP clients as a cdrom. Like a virtual CD-ROM. Can some one help me how to to it?? Thanks Juergen Juergen Gumpinger Hauptstrasse 27 A-4770 Andorf Tel.: +43-7766-41208 Mob.: +43-676-4322650 Fax.: +43-7766-41207 -------------- next part -------------- HTML

Some might have noticed that REvolution Computing released the doSMP package to the general public about a month and a half ago, which allows multiple cores to be accessed for parallel computation in R. Some of our physical habitat calculations were taking an extraordinary amount of time to complete and required over-weekend runs, which prompted our interest in this package. What follows

Dear Samba community, We run two Samba server in a CTDB cluster in a small group withing a bigger company. We use Winbind to authenicate and authorize against a company-wide active directory (using `security = ads` and `idmap config OURDOMAIN : backend = ad`, resp., among others). So, if I understand this correctly authentication is done via Kerberos and authorization via LDAP. Unfortunately (but

Well that was easier than I thought. Here's the default config provided by archlinux's samba package, but with "deadtime = 1" included. With this config, shares mounted via mount.cifs thrash on port 445 after a few minutes. I think the reconnect logic in the kernel's CIFS client is broken. Should I report this on the kernel mailing list? ----- # This is the main Samba

On 2017-09-09, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote: > > So, in other words, there's no need to worry if a little swap is used > when the system's been running non-stop for a couple months? As long as your system isn't thrashing swap it's totally fine. From what you've written it doesn't sound like you're thrashing. --keith -- kkeller at

Have you solved? I have the sambe issue with NEtapp CDOT 9.1 P11, latest versions, tried with AD and works It seems that domain users are not showed correctly when tey are set as priamry bug, it seems a samba bug Can you help? Thanks<div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> <tr> <td

On 1/22/20 10:03 AM, R. Diez wrote: > Hi all: > > I am using the libvirt version that comes with Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS. I'm sorry, I don't have Ubuntu installed anywhere to look the version up. Can you run 'virsh version' to find it out for me please? > > I have written a script that backs up my virtual machines every night. I > want to limit the amount of

I currently have a samba 3.6 pdc. I would like to migrate that to a samba 4 dc. I haven't been able to google out all the 'samba migration' hits that meet my specific use case. Sorry if there is something blindingly obvious on this topic. Is it possible to set up a samba 4 dc, and have it capture the sambe 3.6 pdc info? Currently, samba uses tdbsam. (no ldap) It runs on an Centos