similar to: smbmount discontinued?

I'm reading the samba-howto-collection and just got a doubt. Even using mysql or ldap I still have to have one user for each username I insert in pdbedit (smbpasswd/ldap/mysql/etc) ? There's no way to automatize it just like the add user command to add machines in the passwd? regards thiago lima.

Hi, I have been playing with the latest alpha (samba-3.0alpha20) for a while now trying to get Kerberos and smbmount working together to access shares on a Windows 2000 Server SP3. As I understand it, without modifications to the code this should not work at all. I tried to make a few changes, namely setting c->use_kerberos=True and commenting out c->use_spnego=False. I also had to comment

Hello, I've been thinking about setting up some sort of pool printing, where a job can be sent and the system can decide which printer to send it to. I know that with cups I can define a pool, but I'd like to have samba print a notification as to which printer cups sent the job to. The rationale is: I have multiple printers, each under a maintenance agreement. I have some printers

Hello, Samba-users, please don?t beat me, but I have to ask this question here, as I haven?t found an answer I can rely on until now. I am working on a solution for a backup-problem and one possible solution could be the use of smbfs/smbmount. I am testing that now, mounting a WinXPHome(sorry, testing ...)-share which is 20GB of size (8GB used) to my linux-box. The linux-box is a bit more

dear list. this question is rather related to samba, although not exclusively. I consider it related enough to ask here, please apologise if you don't. we are in the process of setting up a samba domain at my company. a goal is to replace our current nt4 servers. another goal is to provide an easy way to access the documents on the lan (and peoples home directories) from 'outside'

Hello, I have to migrate a network with a samba 2.2 PDC to a new host with a Samba 3.0 PDC. Samba 3.0 is up and running now. The only thing that makes me nervous is how to migrate the profiles of the old PDC to the new PDC. Unfortunately usernames/machine names will also change. The profiles are per user (not per machine) and will stay this way. The clients are win2K pro, winXP pro. Is it

I'm trying to set up a "dropbox" application that will monitor a directory for newly created files and process them. The problem I am having is that my linux process is not recognizing that a file is still being written to by another server. Here's the configuration: Redhat Linux with 2.4.9-31smp kernel using SAMBA 2.0.10 client to mount a share that exists on a Windows 2000

Greetings All, I am trying to use MySQL4 as the backend for authentication through Samba 3.0.0. When I finally got it to compile ok (damn that mysql/mysql.h) I cannot get it to work. Below you'll find the log transcript from when I try to connect with any client -- smbclient in this case. And yes, I have the MySQL-part setup correctly using the example mysql.dump from the dist and the user

Greetings, I am trying, FROM a Linux Red Hat 7.3, to mount a share sitting on a Windows 2003 Server and I am getting the following problems. I had done this with a NT4 server and it was working fine. I am trying to mount the following: mount.smbfs //NT2003SERVER/share /mnt -o username=user,password=pass At first, I was getting the following error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is

For two days now I've tried for two days now to get cifs working on a redhat 9.0 2.4.20 based linux box. I followed the instructions given at http://de.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html, i.e. compiling cifs-0.6.8 and mount.cifs rev. 1.2.2.1. I successfully loaded the cifs.o as a module and following the given examples I tried: [root@r151-101 cifs]# /sbin/mount.cifs //raid/demo

hi, i just noticed the following running netstat: udp 0 0 192.168.1.100:137 0.0.0.0:* 19862/nmbd udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:137 0.0.0.0:* 19862/nmbd udp 0 0 192.168.1.100:138 0.0.0.0:* 19862/nmbd udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:138 0.0.0.0:* 19862/nmbd in my smb.conf i got: interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only =

Digium has discontinued their ATA iaxy adapter; don't blame them, too expensive so they can not compete. The adapter is upgraded automaticaly when it is connected to new asterisk version; since this adapter is discontinued will it still work with asterisk 1.6 and beyond or will it be\ just a "door stopper"? -- Joseph

I am seeing a problem that I am not sure how to fix and since I have never had to use samba for anything major like this I am not sure where to go. So, here is goes! I have a few Gentoo systems that currently have a bunch of data on them. I have been tasked with getting data from some Windows machines to the Gentoo systems so that we can dump the Windows machines. So, the windows machines are

Hi, I've been using the Dovecot EE packages for Ubuntu for some time now and just recently started getting 404 errors. Have those packages been discontinued or is this just a temporary issue? Thanks.

Does anybody know why Digium S100I IAXy was discontinued? -- #Joseph

Hey, all. I'm in the middle of a rollout, and just learned that the SoundPoint IP 430 -- my favorite mid-range phone -- has been discontinued. The heir apparent is the SoundPoint IP 450 -- for a low, low, low $130 more/handset. AND it doesn't look as nice. Ouch. Does anyone have any recommendations -- Polycom or otherwise -- for a good-quality, mid-range, two-line SIP phone (with good

ANLEGER UHR BJ5N.F!!! DIE RALLYE IST GESTARTET Firma: BOERSE INVEST BETEI WKN : 797639 ISIN : CH0012802093 Markt: Frankfurt Kürzel : BJ5N.F Preis: 1.90 5-Tag Prognose: 3.00 KAUFEN KAUFEN KAUFEN! BJ5N.F ESGESCHAFT FIN UNTER PARI!

I've encountered a following bug: I use one "path" statement in "general" section: "path = /var/network/%S". Then I keep symlinks to my services in /var/network. When I installed samba-2.2.0, my printers stopped working. I've investigated this incident with debug=3 and discovered that samba refused to spool to file "/var/network/%S/smbprn.9". Subj

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Yuri <yuri at tsoft.com> wrote: > Pekka Jääskeläinen wrote: >> >> On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: >>> >>> Looks like this is platform dependent. >> >> Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. >> >> Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required >> as of LLVM 2.7 to

On 04/28/2010 11:42 AM, Yuri wrote: > Looks like this is platform dependent. Yep, works fine here on Debian 5.0/x86_64 with gcc 4.3.2. Did you build with make REQUIRES_RTTI=1 which is required as of LLVM 2.7 to get RTTI for LLVM symbols? -- Pekka