similar to: Multiple Users On One Share With Permissions=755 for Created Files

Hi all. I'm having a strange issue with a server running Samba 3.0.2a. The server has a single share, and under that are subfolders that contain documents. Each subfolder is owned by a different folder-specific group, and users belong to the groups that own the folders to which they need access. But suddenly one user can't access any folders. Windows (the client) suggests that she

Hello, I've got a CentOS box and users are putting Windows long files on it, files with " " and " - " in their filenames. I'm trying to adjust the permissions as well as user and group membership and i'd like the changes to be sticky. On the tld i've set permissions of 2755 and am trying to batch convert the files and subfolders in it. I've done this: find

Hi, all, I am wondering if it is possible to set parameters of 'rpart' and 'tree' such that they will produce the exact same tree? Thanks. Auston Wei Statistical Analyst Department of Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Tel: 713-563-4281 Email: wwei@mdanderson.org [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi guys, I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it isn't going to be included given that it works reasonable well (and is optional anyway, so not likely to be detrimental)? Thanks, Joe

OK. Everything is going great for 4 years on my FC3 Samba Version 3.0.3-5. Now all of a sudden, when someone opens a Word/Excel file on a Samba share, it changes the user Owner to that user as well as modifies the permissions to r-x and leaves the group/permission bits/owner setting alone. I have the root directories for all shares with the u and g sticky bits set on, but it is not enforcing

After parsing through the various bits of available documentation, I'm forced to bow before the group and ask the following Silly User Question: While I can create and set NT ACLs on files/folder, anything in the root of the share can be deleted by any user who has access to that share. I've munged something in my file permissions. What /should/ the file permissions for a root share

Hi, there, I am having trouble using 'lrm' function in package 'Design'. Basically, the ' . ' after ' ~ ' wouldn't work. Here are some sample codes: > temp <- data.frame(a=c(rep(0,3),rep(1,3)),b=rnorm(6),c=c('a','b','c','a','b','c')) > lrm(a~.,data=temp) Error in terms.formula(formula, specials =

.PLS files should work for iOS devices. See sample text: [playlist] numberofentries=1 File1=http://91.121.91.172:31090/LG73 Title1=LG73 Vancouver's Best Music Mix! Length1=-1 Version=2 On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Holden Stanford <hstanford1 at gmail.com> wrote: > You can create a .m3u or .mp3 container linking to the stream URL. I can't > remember the exact tags

I have a pretty simply home LAN with a Linux box (Mandrake 9.1) and 2 XP boxes. The workgroup is named UNIVERSE and the machines are earth (Linux), voyager (XP) and starbase (XP). (smb.conf has security=user). Voyager can browse over to \\earth\share no problem. Recently I connected starbase to my LAN using a wireless router. When on starbase I cannot browse to \\earth\share. When I do so I

In a sortable list, is there a way to say, pass a className whereby some of the elements in the sortable element would not become draggables/droppables? If not, it seems like it could be implemented similarly to the handle option.. Any interest? Also - I submitted a patch that adds the option "delay" so that draggables in a Sortable won''t truly become activated until after the

I'm attempting to reflect the information for use with corresponding fields in GUI (in a different package), to provide default values, argname as key for UI label lookups, etc. So I want something much more like the formals of the implementation: { "object", "method": c("median", "vs", "tukey"),

Dear gluster experts, We're running glusterfs 3.3 and we have met file permission probelems after gluster volume rebalance. Files got stick permissions T--------- after rebalance which break our client normal fops unexpectedly. Any one known this issue? Thank you for your help. -- ??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Greetings all. Any help with the following would be appreciated. I want to create a data frame for each file in a directory. The following code does not work but it may show what I am trying to do: carmakes <- c('BMW','Chrysler','Citroen','Fiat','Ford','Holden','Honda',

Hello, What is the justification for having both /var/run/puppet and /var/lib/puppet/state both world writable and sticky? Thank you, -- Rob -- ____________________________________________________________________________________ Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com. Try it now. _______________________________________________ Puppet-users mailing list

With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0.3. Here is a summary of the changes: * Show error message when failing to write a PID file. * Ignore spaces at end of lines in config files. * Fix handling of late packets. * Unify BSD tun/tap device handling. This allows IPv6 on tun devices and anything on tap devices as long as the underlying OS supports it. * Handle IPv6 on Solaris tun

With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0.3. Here is a summary of the changes: * Show error message when failing to write a PID file. * Ignore spaces at end of lines in config files. * Fix handling of late packets. * Unify BSD tun/tap device handling. This allows IPv6 on tun devices and anything on tap devices as long as the underlying OS supports it. * Handle IPv6 on Solaris tun

I'd like to go back to 2.2.3a since I cant get printing to work at moment with 2.2.4 at the moment does any one know where I can get this from the samba ftp site seems to not keep previous versions. thanks in advance, Dave. -- Personal Links:- Recommended reading : http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/dbnationtp/ UK Privacy (R.I.P) : http://www.stand.org.uk/commentary.php3 Public

I have an [apps] share that was intended to be read-only (to keep viruses away) however some Windows programs require rw access to specific files. I don't want to open-up everything on the share to rw, only those specific files/directories that need 'w' access. Here's the dilemma: In order for users to be able to change a file, the file and directory it's in need to have rw

I have one Samba share on my server (RH9). The permission on the shared folders/files are set to 777. The owner of the files/folders is let's say X. When I mount the share on my workstation (Mandrake 9.1) using the username, uid and gid option (of user X) the owner of the files that I see at the mount point is still X, but the permissions are now 755. Why aren't the permission's

Hi Everyone, Just prior to christmas I asked a question relating to the interaction of SAMBA with UNIX permissions. The answer I got back was to set the sticky bit on the folder in question. I did this and sure enough SAMBA then followed the behaviour I expected. Can any one explain to me why? For those of you baffled, this is what occurs: Without the sticky bit set on a folder that has rwx