similar to: WINS problem?

Hello All, I have a custom built version of Samba 4.19.2 running on Rocky Linux 9. When I attempt to change a password via LDAP, I get an error, "Unwilling to Perform". In Google searches I found that this is due to password complexity requirements. However, in my case, I get the error no matter how complex the password. Also, I have the following line in my smb.conf file: ldap

Thanks go to Darren Tucker who posted about "#if 0" on auth-pam.c I saw his email in the archive, about solaris 7. I removed the "#if 0", and finally, password expiration works. A caviat or two: If UseLogin=no (the default) , if a user fails to use the correct password for a "change on first login" account, you get the following message: sshd(SYSTEM): Sorry,

could be "hot". Is there any chance this would cause the card to fail after a while? It appears this site just had 4 port Digium card fail today. > Also, I am trying to cross connect with another Asterisk system with > > the normal LBO setting (i.e. span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs) but as of yet the > > systems aren't seeing each other at all. Could the side with the high >

My tool is growing fast and it takes me to the finishing line for setting up my new user database. But nw I came across another strange issue: I'd like to change the primaryGroupID. It is currently set to 513, which simply does not exist. I wanted to set to 100, which exists and actually the user is a member of this group, but then I get the following exception: ldap.UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM:

There is a draft of a new document at http://www.burns-stat.com/pages/Tutor/unwilling_S.pdf entitled "Using S for the Unwilling". (Or click on Tutorials from the main web page.) The aim is to get an inexperienced person who has a task to do in S-PLUS or R oriented and comfortable enough not to give up. The audience I have in mind has no experience with either statistics or

Hi Chad, Thanks for your report. Everything seems fine, apart from the battery.date (2052/00/36), which vaguely recall me something... I've added this info to the Testing and trunk driver.list Arnaud -- Please note my new email address: arnaudquette at eaton.com -- Linux / Unix Expert R&D - MGE Office Protection Systems - http://www.mgeops.com Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader -

Here is the problem: Installed Debian Woody Installed Samba 3.02a-1 Setup Samba Setup Network to use Static IP address (Being a PDC / WINS Server and all...) Now I'm getting the following: >ifconfig eth0 eth0: Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr: [MAC address here] inet addr:192.168.x.19 Bcast:192.168.x.255 Mask: 255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 .....etc....

Hi Giang, Given that the community deprecated the Alpha backend, I'm doubtful anyone would be able to point you in the right direction. Have you iteratively tried the difference versions of LLVM (i.e., 2.9, 2.8, 2.7 on down the line)? Chad On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Giang Hoang <ghoang84 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > For my work, I want to use LLVM to compile SPEC 2k

On 24 May 2013 17:39, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote: > One side effect of dynamically computing the aliases is that the iterator > does not guarantee that the entries are ordered or that duplicates have > been removed. > Hi Chad, Sounds like you're growing the list (thus the lookup time), rather than shrinking, as I take it was Jacob's original intention?

When checking on the UNIX attributes of the Domain Admins group I get the warning "Unwilling to perform" Is this something I should resolve first? Lin

I think RR DNS is the only viable solution under these circumstances. If you can cope with the fact that failovers won't be seamless, I don't think there's anything wrong with that though. On 07/21/2015 11:54 AM, Laz C. Peterson wrote: > The consensus seems to say no to RR DNS ? I am going to take that into serious consideration. > > With this proxy setup you describe, what

On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 07:53:55PM +0800, piaojun wrote: > > > On 2019/9/6 19:52, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:36 PM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 10:15:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > >>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:49 PM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> wrote:

Hello. I'm having a problem regarding locked users in ldap. We are using 389DS ldap server. We lock our users with nsAccountLock=true. If user successfully logs into dovecot, his credentials gets cached. When this user is locked its credentials still stay in cache. The problem I'm having is that our ldap server returns error code 53 ("Unwilling to perform - Account

Hi everyone samba --version Version 4.0.0alpha18-GIT-bfc7481 openSUSE 12.1 If I do this: ldbmodify --url=/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b dc=hh3,dc=site dn: CN=steve6,CN=Users,DC=hh3,DC=site changetype: modify add: objectclass objectclass: posixaccount - replace: primarygroupid primarygroupid: 1134 I get an error something like: ERR: (Unwilling to perform) error 53 If however I do the

On 18/11/15 22:32, Jeff Dickens wrote: > > ​Ok, so I have it working, sort-of. It's kind of screwed up. Here's > what I did, and then a couple of followup questions. > > > On the DC I ran wbinfo -i to look at some existing groups: > > root at athens:/etc/pam.d# wbinfo -i domain\ guests > domain guests:*:3000012:3000012::/home/IOL/domain guests:/bin/false >

Samba 3.2.1 on linux OpenFiler 2.3 I have an external LDAP server with anonymous bind and pam ProFtpd linked to LDAP server works well without error But samba does not work, in smbd.log I have: [2008/09/09 22:01:54, 0] passdb/secrets.c:fetch_ldap_pw(888) fetch_ldap_pw: neither ldap secret retrieved! [2008/09/09 22:01:54, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(952) ldap_connect_system:

On 23/10/15 23:51, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Hi, > > I am sure I have come across this before but have previously either > ignored it or somehow worked around it. However it has come up again > and this time I will try to find out what's going on, hopefully we can > fix whatever the issue is. > > I have a Samba 4.2.2 domain that generally works fine; I have rfc2307 >

"A Guide for the Unwilling S User" is available at http://www.burns-stat.com/pages/Tutor/unwilling_S.pdf (Or click on Tutorials from the main web page.) This is an improved version of the document that was put in the same location a few days ago. It has dropped the "draft" status, but I am always interested in suggestions for improvements. The 8 page document has the aim of

Hi, I'm running Samba 4.0.8, on FreeBSD 9.2, from operating system packages, as a DC. I have a BDC, running the same. I'm using a Windows 7 workstation with "Active Directory Users and Computers" snap-in to manage usernames, passwords, etc. The workstation is part of the domain, and I'm logged on as Administrator in the domain. I can create groups and add members to them

On Jan 13, 2015, at 8:15 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > On Mon, January 12, 2015 11:47, Warren Young wrote: >> On Jan 10, 2015, at 7:42 PM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, January 9, 2015 17:36, John R Pierce wrote: >>>> >>>> Enterprise to me implies large business >>>