similar to: Samba 3 doesn't compile - the saga continues...

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Samba 3 doesn't compile - the saga continues..."

2003 Nov 07
1
Samba 3 still doesn't work - build errors (details)
Ok, this is simply getting annoying now. First, with Slackware 9, I could build Samba 3, could join a domain, but nobody in the domain could use the Samba machine, or browse the shares on it, or log into it. Just for grins, I decided to build a whole new machine and try with the latest Slackware (9.1) to see if I could fare any better. No go.... I can't even get Samba 3 to build. Besides
2003 Oct 22
1
more solaris/samba 3 build problems
Samba team.. I spent an hour trying to post to the samaba news group at gmane.org. my browser seems retarded, and I need to do work. I also spent about 20 minutes trying to figure out the bugzilla deal, but its beyond me, plus i am getting very frustraited trying to send this damm bug report. so.. here.. here is the bug report. please post it, whatever. Hi all, I am attempting to
2003 Oct 26
0
The saga continues
Shorewall 1.4.7c is now available and continues the saga with "<zone>_frwd" chains. My apologies for this mess.... -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2011 Aug 15
0
The saga continues ....
.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC14 host. Actually, I *HAD* a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM :-) .... After a read of the virt-install man page, I concluded that I could lose the current VM (but *NOT* its HDD image) & recreate it fairly easily w/ the right combo of arguments to virt-install. The proceedings: [root at Q6600:/etc, Mon Aug 15, 04:30 PM] 1163 # virsh list
2005 Aug 10
0
The CDex and Flac saga continues
Hello all, I seem to be in a bit of a bind. Below is the email which I sent to the list a while back. I wrote the vast majority of my CD collection to Flac and checked them with the Flac test (the -t option of Flac), they played fine and all seemed wonderful. Sadly life is no longer roses and chocolates. Now as I come to rip the whole lot to Vorbis files, Oggenc is spewing an error that the
2005 Aug 13
0
The CDex and Flac saga continues
At 01:42 AM 8/13/2005, you wrote: > > It would actually be easier to rerip all your CDs using EAC. I rip to > > ogg vorbis with EAC and it comes out fine. I can give you a website URL > > that will give you the info on how to setup EAC to use ogg vorbis. And I > > use -q 8 so they sound good. > >Thanks for the suggestion, Jon, but I would rather not re-rip them. I
2012 Jun 20
0
"idmap backend = ad" saga continues
Hello All, Been a week or three since I could return to this puzzle but I've found some time and thought I'd refresh on my progress so far. I'm trying to set up a CentOS_6.2 box running samba 3.5.10-116 to authenticate against a Windows 2008R2 AD for SSH logins. We've previously done this using winbind and local account on each machine matching AD accounts but I'd like to do
2006 Nov 03
0
-all-static problems when linking apps which require -lpthread and -lc
Hello all, I used to use fully statically linked PHP, which I build into RPM using own-written spec-file. I need to do this as there are a lot of boxes with old linuxes (RedHat 6.2, 7, 9) which I can't upgrade to CentOS3/4 right now for a several reasons I don't want to explain here. When I've been using CentOS 4.0 and 4.1 - there were no big problems to link PHP as static executable
2009 Aug 28
4
Ether Saga Online Error??? Help!!!
Hi, i don't know a lot about linux. But i wanted to play Ether Saga Online... Anyways, When i ran Launcher.exe Code: wine Launcher.exe
2011 Nov 11
2
Lost Saga / Rusty Hearts compatibility
Hello everyone, I'm a big fan of Lost Saga but despite we can finally use the launcher and update the game, it'll still not start because of X-trap (like Rusty Hearts). I read that Wine's developers doesn't want to solve the problem because of privacies problems, but personally I don't care that much [Wink] If they want to take informations about my computer (and do we know
2011 Aug 15
0
Ongoing VM saga ....
.... I have a 64-bit CentOS 5.6 VM running on a 64-bit FC-14 host. I was originally using the stock NAT networking on the guest, which could access the host, but nothing else on the network. I eventually found some links on how to setup routed networking on the guest using a specifically setup bridge. I followed the example a bit too closely, bridging my eth0 interface, which is the one I
2010 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
Attached is the 5th and final patch of the beginning of COFF support for MC. It simply makes the X86 backend use it on Win32 targets and tests it. - Michael Spencer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ms-coff-patch-5.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 23435 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2010 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
On 26 July 2010 04:35, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > Attached is the 5th and final patch of the beginning of COFF support > for MC. It simply makes the X86 backend use it on Win32 targets and > tests it. > > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- case Triple::Win32: + case Triple::Cygwin: + case Triple::MinGW32: return
2010 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
On 26 July 2010 18:08, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at gmail.com> > wrote: > > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- > > case Triple::Win32: > > + case Triple::Cygwin: > > + case Triple::MinGW32: > > return new
2011 Jul 12
1
CentOS 6: the ongoing saga
We'll ignore that the group name for KDE changed, and so, since we had it on the same line as X, neither was installed. However, more of an annoyance: to get nfs working, I had to install: pam-krb5 ncsd then fix /etc/init.d/autofs (when I did a service restart, it told me automount was running, and did not stop it), then after some research, found I had to manually start rpcbind, *then*
2003 Oct 15
1
Samba 3.0 + OpenLDAP 2.1 Saga (LDAP Attacks!)
Oh Wise Ones, For the past two days, I have contested with the Samba documentation and other sources of lore in a vain attempt to achieve Samba/LDAP integration. My test system is running RedHat 9 with updates applied, along with OpenLDAP & OpenSSL from redhat-rawhide, and the Samba 3.0.1pre1 RPM from the Samba website. A couple of questions: The HOWTOs instruct one to slapadd a file
2010 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- >    case Triple::Win32: > +  case Triple::Cygwin: > +  case Triple::MinGW32: >      return new WindowsX86AsmBackend (T); > Aaron Can someone test this on those platforms? That change would effect quite a few people. -
2010 Jul 31
0
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I tried setting these to false, but the resulting executable (made >>> with link.exe) crashed. I
2010 Mar 28
1
[PLUG] Ongoing saga with Samba and AD
Ben Love had this to say: > * Mike Leone wrote on [2010-03-27 22:02:38 -0400]: >> I tried to log on as "DACRIB+administrator" at the physical console. I >> was prompted twice for my password (dunno if that's because my password >> has a "!" in it or not). Then it starts to login. I see the motd. I see >> it say that it was trying to create a
2010 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Daniel somehow replied to one of my previous commits on llvm-commits >>> instead of this thread.