similar to: ext3 for 2.2 and LFS

A patch that implements acls on ext3 for kernel 2.2.x is available at http://moldybread.net/patch/kernel-2.2/ It looks to be stable. Beat it, break it.

Has anyone tried LFS (ie >2G files support) and Ext3 together? Are there good reasons why this should/should not work? I see the RH enterprise kernel patch set specifically does not attempt both lfs and ext3, but the lfs patches themselves touch some reasonably localised parts of ext2, so I would hope (without having dived in there to test), that the ext3 changes would mirror that

Hello, lfs prints different obd(idx) compared to lctl dl. We use single striping. cluster1 tmp # lfs find --obd scia-OST0017_UUID /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1 /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1 cluster1 tmp # lfs getstripe

Hello, I found my samba can only support files no larger than 2GB. Searched internet for a while and learned I need the LFS patch. The problem is where can I found them? The link from google seems unreachable. I found the patch is smbfs-2.4.16-lfs.patch and samba-2.2.2-lfs.patch, but I'm running kernel 2-4-20 and samba-2.2.7a, so the newer kernel and samba doesn't include these LFS patch?

Hallo altogether! First of all I want to thank the developers for the great codec! But I have the following problem now: I have built my own Linux from Scratch and also compiled everything that is necessary to have ogg and vorbis and tools for de- and encoding. Just the encoding turned out to have very poor quality independent how high I set the quality level. It has some kind

I have ext3 0.0.6b + 2.2.19 and cannot get ext3 to compile as a module. If I try to modularize it, or turn in off completely, the kernel build fails. Is there an easy fix for this, or is there something that I am missing? Thanks. Peter

< This patch is against openssh-2.5.2p2 > Here's a few lines we changed a while back in "scp.c" to get it to transfer large (>2GB) file on a 32-bit system using LFS. Obviously, you don't want the line hard-coded in that sets _FILE_OFFSET_BIT=64, but perhaps you could make it a configure option. (Is it already perhaps?) Do you agree that these lines are neccessary

Hello, Now that kernel 2.2.20 is out with security fixes, I'd be interested in using it with ext3. The latest patch for 2.2.19, 0.0.7a, applies with some offset (both with and without kdb), and even compiles (without kdb), but I scarcely know what I am doing so haven't tried it yet. Could people in the know enlighten me on that point? I guess there is little chance for another ext3

Hi, The LFS page hosted on suse's servers states that smbfs has probs with large files and it seems to be a bit out-of-date. http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html I can't correct him with authority, but maybe one of the team should. -------------- Martyn Ranyard I am not a member of the samba team, and anything that I say may not be as accurate as a response from one of the

Hello All, I have a production server that is running 2.2.20. This server *has* to be up 24X7 - what I'm wondering is: 1) Is ext3 on 2.2.20 rock stable? Or, would you recommend that I just stay with ext2? 2) I have looked far and wide for a the ext3 patch for 2.2.20 - where can I find it? 3) Were are the e2fsprogs that are appropriate to run with the 2.2.X kernel series? Thanks,

Hi, I installed a 2.4.18 kernel, with ext3 support and make a tune2fs -j /dev/sdxxx with all partitions, now I want to run a 2.2.20 kernel, I want to know if I can use the patch for 2.2.20 series (0.0.7a) without problems with my new ext3 partitions, or I must mount it as ext2 from 2.2.20, greetings and reply to admin@cideweb.com, I'm not subscribed to the list.

Hi, ext3-0.9.18 is now available for 2.4.19-pre8. Some of the fixes in this release are already in the 2.4.19-pre8, but there are some important new fixes in the patch and users are encouraged to upgrade. This release fixes all known outstanding bug reports. The full patch against linux-2.4.19-pre8, and a tarball of the individual fixes in this patch set, is now propagating to

Machine info- (names are netbios names) LINUXBOX OS: LFS-4.1 Linux SAMBA 2.2.8 No CUPS installed Ran SWAT once just to get a basic config file, no shares from this machine. DESKTOP OS: Windows XP Home SP1 Sharing a HP Deskjet 648C through LPT1 Sharing is enabled on LAN connection Only has one user, Mike, that has no password I can do "smbclient -L DESKTOP" and it will list its shares.

Dear list, pardon my ignorance on ext2/3fs. Is the ext2fs' 4Tb file system and 2GB maximum file size limit still true in ext3fs? Thanks for your reply, Gotze __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com

I tried running ext3 with posix acls (see http://acl.bestbits.at). The patches were easily merged and everything compiled fine. I created a journal.dat on my /home fs and mounted it as ext3. So far everything worked perfectly. But getfacl/setfacl didn't work on ext3. Mounting /home as ext2 solved the problem. Maybe ext3 and ext2 don't share enough code to get it working without rewriting

Subject of Hint: How to create a Bootable Live CD/DVD from your Linux From Scratch (LFS) build Good day from Singapore, I am Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming, based in Singapore. I have recently *successfully* created my own custom Linux distribution called Teo En Ming Linux 2020.03 (FINAL), which is based on Linux From Scratch 20200302-systemd book and Linux Kernel 5.5.7, on 12 March

I've not been happy with the stories about the "stable" 2.4.x kernels. Everywhere I read people saying "not for production use". Would you recommend adding ext3 to 2.2.19 (ext3-0.0.7a) or moving to 2.4.1x and using ext3 there (ext3-0.9.12)? -- -IAN! Ian! D. Allen Ottawa, Ontario, Canada idallen@ncf.ca Home Page on the Ottawa FreeNet: http://www.ncf.ca/~aa610/

Hi, I use samba on Linux 2.6 and 2G over size file sharing. It seems smbmount '-o lfs' need to use with large file. but default man page doesn't say this option. I want to edit smbmount.8.xml for lfs and unicode option. I believe using mount.cifs is right way on latest Linux. But one of the implementation smb_clients tools take this lazy option. Is it right way to change of man page

Hello, We are using Samba 4.10.16 as a file server on a linux box with SLES 12. All is working fine with our NAS NFS Shares. We are now trying to integrate new NFS Shares from an archive provider, but samba gets crashed when a client tries to access files on these shares. New start of samba is required! In the smbd.log, I see these entries: [2020/06/24 17:58:23.118208, 1]

Apologies for a vague and wooly bug report, but I can't reproduce this on my test systems - I *can* reproduce it on some production ones like a flash.... but that seems to upset our operations guys :-( I am getting a set of crashes on some boxes in the field, apparently related to high network traffic (this only occurs on boxes with ethernet connectivity back to the centre rather than the