similar to: Not reading quota under 3.0.0

I've got some problems with file access control on a linux-server with samba 3.0.14a compiled from a src-rpm. This is the method I've been using for the past 5-6 releases. It's a redhat 8.0 machine and the kernel version is 2.4.30. The problems seem to have appeared since upgrading from 3.0.13. Symptom 1: When using force group on a share, users from the two groups edb and

Hello, I'm working on a server and I enabled quota's on the filesystem. This works fine. But Samba doesn't see that quota. I have read that you need to compile samba with quota support. My problem is that I have a running Samba (from SuSe 10) and I don't know if there is quota support build in. Is there some way to see if quota support has been compiled in? Greetings, Peter

We have a rhel4 system running samba - domain user accounts - NFS disk space. All updates and software patches have been applies through rhn. Since samba was installed with redhat provided rpms, --with-quotas WAS configured in. The samba share is seen and can be used by authenticated users. However quotas are not being recognized. The same disk space, if accessed via Windows shares are

RedHat Enterprise AS 4 Samba 3.0.10-1.4E.12.2 nfs automounted home directories Samba: --with Options: WITH_ADS WITH_AUTOMOUNT WITH_PAM WITH_QUOTAS WITH_SENDFILE WITH_SMBMOUNT WITH_SYSLOG WITH_UTMP WITH_WINBIND Logged in locally, a user is warned when over quota and cannot copy further files. Over CIFS, a user is warned when over quota and cannot copy

Hello folks, I am implementing on a RH Fedora Core Linux machine NTLM authentication through samba 3.0.2 for my squid server (Squid-2.5STABLE5-2). Our customer's environment is Mixed Mode Windows 2000. To make a long story short: (1) I have successfully upgraded kerberos from 1.2.7 to 1.3.3 (I was successful because I also upgraded the libraries that kerberos 1.3.3 requires (2) I have

I noticed lots of smbclient options are missing in Samba 3.0.14a when compared to 3.0.13 - notably, all user/authentication options - so I can't connect now as a specified user anymore. Is it just my build, or is it "official"? Samba 3.0.14a: # smbclient --usage Usage: [-?] [-?|--help] [--usage] [-R|--name-resolve NAME-RESOLVE-ORDER] [-M|--message HOST] [-I|--ip-address IP]

Hi everybody, I have a problem with Samba 3.0.2 using POSIX ACLs for shares. File written from an ACL group/user will get wrong permissions and are unchangeable for other users. First the important informations about the configuration and the setup: a) Base system: Debian 3.0.1 with all updates b) Samba: Self compiled binary within /opt/samba-3.0.2 used the following flags:

Hello. I can not enter the domain machine: net rpc join -S 192.168.128.10 -U user cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: rpc_pipe_bind for pipe \lsarpc failed with error NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Could not initialise lsa pipe Enter root's password: cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: rpc_pipe_bind for pipe \lsarpc failed with error NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Error connecting to LSA pipe. Error was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL

Hello Everyone, I must extend my THANK YOU for such fantastic work!, as well as this great resource. I've tried fiddling with AD and samba 3.0 alpha23 as well as a CVS checkout dated APR-16-03. Below are the relevant(Hopefully:)) items of my config. Once I can get a tgt and initial ticket I think I'll be O.K. I was hoping someone on this list could point out a gotcha :). TIA, Jesse.

Dear All I've been working at building a file server to provide file sharing for a Windows 2003 Active Directory Domain. Our requirements are for the Windows Server Administrator to be able to create all the users' home folders in the Samba share and apply restrictive permissions. Ie. User joe, //samba/joe$ or //samba/share/joe (Dfs), with permissions for only the user "joe"

Hi, I am almost ready to switch over from 2.2.7 to 3 but found that a user profile created in 2.2 doesn't work in 3- ie; during login to a Samba 3 server, an error occurs and profile modifications are not permitted or recognized. This may seem trivial but I have 50 users, each with complex desktop setups which help them with there daily tasks of CG post production (so some of you know

Hi, I tried to upgrade from Samba 2.2.8a to 3.0. It worked generally speaking fine and speed went up tremendously, BUT since then the DOS conversion of long file names is freaking me out. Using long file names produced a readable short version plus ~1 oder ~x. where x stands for a number. now long file names produce some cryptic 8 letter name plus extension. listing in a DOS box

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 10:09 +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello again, Samba experts, > > sorry for being such a pain in your necks, but I really need to get a > recent Samba version to compile, and it looks like I definitely need > your help with this. > > In the meantime, I have found that the huge number of "conflicting > types" errors for rpc_*_init(...)

I'm curious to know where the tdbsam password database file is kept on my Fedora 7 system. Using the unmodified smb.conf file that shipped with Fedora 7, I've enabled users using smbpasswd, and successfully accessed shares. I just can't figure out where the password database is located: [root@box ~]# service smb start [root@box ~]# setsebool samba_enable_home_dirs on [root@box ~]#

Hello, I'm trying to set up samba using ADS for authentication. I can successfully join the samba machine to the domain. Windows hosts can "see" the samba machine. After successfully joining, doing: # wbinfo -u shows me ADS-defined users. Same goes for groups. However, when I try and assign one of those users ownership of a file, I get: # chown user1 /tmp/test chown: test1:

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 11:28 +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > and many thanks for your fast reply! :-) > > Am 08.06.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > > I think the key to avoiding the issue is that you have listed rpc > > modules which are not modules. The only rpc server module is > > rpc_mdssvc_module. > > Ah, OK, I see - so I

Greetings ... I hate to ask these questions, but I dought I will get a straight answer from an Salesmen ... I am looking at putting gigabit in as a back bone for a few Linux servers, but I have used an Accton Gigabit ethernet card with RedHat 8.0/9 and found it a little unstable ... do and RedHat users have a suggestion on a good, but not expensive Gigabit card, basicly for a Samba

I have in my smb.conf file the following entries: time server = yes and logon script = startup.bat Where logon script is as follow: -----start script ----- NET TIME \\SUPERSERVER /SET /YES # Here we map network drives to shares on the Samba Server echo Mapping Network Drives to Samba Server Theremin net use s: \\superserver\scratch net use r: \\superserver\share

Hello Andrew, and many thanks for your fast reply! :-) Am 08.06.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > I think the key to avoiding the issue is that you have listed rpc > modules which are not modules. The only rpc server module is > rpc_mdssvc_module. Ah, OK, I see - so I seem to have been wrong when assuming that I could take the output of Samba 3.5.16 "smbd -b" command

Hello Andrew, hello Samba experts, first of all, good news: So I have indeed managed to compile a set co cross-compiled binaries and installed them successfully onto my NAS. Many thanks for your help in getting there! I have now only used --bundled-libraries=ALL \ and left "--with-static-modules" unset (default). From cursorily testing so far, indeed everything