similar to: Re: Migrating Windows NT Environments to Linux

Hi, I would like to install multiple printers (about a hundred) to my Linux site. I have created a smb.conf-file with all the printers (and also a printers.conf as I use CUPS for printing). The printers are e.g. HP LJ 4050 and I do not want to install every one the manual way (I use NT for that). When I manually installs a printer e.g. HP LJ 4050 with driver within lj345.exe from microsoft, the

Currently samba (2.0.6) relies on the NGROUPS_MAX define. This makes the number of allowed simultaneous (per-user) secondary groups a compile-time decision. $ find . -name \*.c | xargs grep NGROUPS ./source/lib/system.c: if (setlen > NGROUPS_MAX) { ./source/lib/replace.c: gid_t grouplst[NGROUPS_MAX]; ./source/lib/replace.c: while (i < NGROUPS_MAX &&

Currently openssh (3.4p1) relies on the NGROUPS_MAX define. This makes the number of allowed simultaneous (per-user) secondary groups a compile-time decision. $ find . -name \*.c | xargs grep NGROUPS_MAX ./groupaccess.c:static char *groups_byname[NGROUPS_MAX + 1]; /* +1 for base/primary group */ ./groupaccess.c: gid_t groups_bygid[NGROUPS_MAX + 1]; ./uidswap.c:static gid_t

Hi, there is a bug in chan_mgcp.c which shows up if you have more than one MGCP gateway configured with host=dynamic. The problem is in the routine find_subchannel when a MGCP response is received. When the response is handled find_subchannel is called with name = NULL and sin = address. This cause the find_subchannel routine to alter the address of all gateways up to the one the response is

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787 Summary: Minor security problem due to use of deprecated NGROUPS_MAX in uidswap.c (sshd) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

Linux has just raised the NGROUPS_MAX limit from 32 to 64k. In doing an audit of various tools, openssh turned up as having incorrect groups handling. Almost no user-space apps really care about NGROUPS_MAX. A proposed patch (untested, since the CVS build won't compile on my RH box.. :-/) : What think? Index: uidswap.c ===================================================================

Ok, for those running NeXT and other platforms with broken/missing _POSIX_SAVED_ID please try this patch, and anyone that has spent any amount of time dealing with this problem. I believe it's right. BTW, this patch is no where near as big as it looks. The patch was done against an earily version of the tree which had an issue with white space. - Ben --- ../openssh/uidswap.c Sun Apr 22

Hi on FreeBSD it happens that without this patch the number of groups is limited to 32. Since we need a greater number of groups, we send this patch. Hope it is approved early. Bye diff -ruN /root/work/samba-3.2.8/source/lib/replace/system/passwd.h /usr/ports/net/samba32/work/samba-3.2.8/source/lib/replace/system/passwd.h --- /root/work/samba-3.2.8/source/lib/replace/system/passwd.h 2009-02-03

Hello, I'm trying to take a Samba-integrated file storage appliance with ZFS as the underlying file system (Nas4Free, in its latest incarnation, to be specific) into use and have gotten it Active Directory integrated just fine, and created shares on it. I can set the owner of the share to the domain Administrator, and I can alter ownership information from a Windows box just fine. ACL's

Jeff, After ssh try to run: newgrp it and then sudo. See if it will work, then you'll have to figure out what's going on with the users groups membership. Regards, Matt ________________________________ From: Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 10:08 AM To: Mattias Zhabinskiy; samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Adding an AD group to

On 06/07/2018 04:04 PM, Teddy Brown via samba wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to create a new Samba server to share files. We currently have an instance of Samba 3.6 on another server which we are using but need to retire that server. > > I recently set up a new AD domain on Samba 4.3.11 on Ubuntu 16.04. There are two domain controllers. Most of the PCs are joined to this AD domain.

> *** openbsd-compat/bsd-nextstep.h.orig Sun Feb 4 00:16:16 2001 > --- openbsd-compat/bsd-nextstep.h Sun Feb 4 00:19:09 2001 > *************** > *** 48,52 **** > --- 48,56 ---- > speed_t cfgetispeed(const struct termios *t); > int cfsetospeed(struct termios *t, int speed); > int cfsetispeed(struct termios *t, int speed); > + > + /* LIMITS */ > + #define

Hello! I'm mounting Windows 2000/XP disk drives from Linux RedHat 7.3 using smbmount. No problems, the disks are mounted. However, it disregards the "uid" and "gid" options and leaves the smbfs owned by "root" giving the "uid" user read-only access and not read-write as expected. Adding the "rw" doesn't help either.

ok after fighting to get my groups sorted out for my test user I created an "sudoer" group and added "jefftest" to "sudoer" > id jefftest uid=11507(jefftest) gid=8513(domain users) groups=8513(domain users),31020(sudoer) and added "sudoer" to /etc/sudoers like so %sudoer ALL=(ALL) ALL now when I login as jefftest I can run commands using sudo back to

# cat /proc/sys/kernel/ngroups_max 65536 # sysctl kernel.ngroups_max kernel.ngroups_max = 65536 Is there a way to change/look at AUTH_SYS? Seems I have 28 groups now as my user I tried created a test user with much less groups but it turns out it is on all those other groups. As such I tried winbind nested groups=no but this doesn't seem to change anything. On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:05

Thanks for the feedback. This is not a testing environment. We deployed the Samba AD environment for our office PCs about one year ago. I am now trying to get the Samba file sharing into AD. We use our mixed Linux/Unix environment heavily. All permissions and ACLs are set in Solaris using NFS4 ACLs on a ZFS filesystem. Our users are in active directory but the groups are not. My understanding

Dear all, This new version of the paper at: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/36/53/37/PDF/RR-6799.pdf got ride of libJIT. Now my question is the how scientific is this research and research paper if instead of using libJIT and Portable.NET JIT: authors of "VMKit: a Substrate for Virtual Machines by Nicolas Geoffray — Gaël Thomas— Charles Clément —Bertil Folliot — Gilles

On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 17:28:43 +0200 Jean-Christophe Delaye via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 06/07/2018 04:04 PM, Teddy Brown via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to create a new Samba server to share files. We > > currently have an instance of Samba 3.6 on another server which we > > are using but need to retire that server. > > >

Hi, all. I'm using RODBC to query a SQL Server 2005 database, and am experiencing terribly slow performance. I assume I'm doing something wrong, but I'm not doing anything fancy, so I'm stumped. My setup: Core 2 Duo 2GHz, Win XP, 2GB RAM R 2.7.1 RODBC (latest from CRAN, not sure the version - how to tell?) SQL Server 2005 MS Access 2003 SQL Native Client ODBC driver (DSN =

Hi list, just in case some of you would not know (this mail is sent for reference in the list archive) : Solaris, whichever version, is limited to 16 groups membership for a given user. Including the main user's group. I learned it the hard way, losing two days with this, thinking it was a Samba bug (and it was not). I was also abused by the fact that Linux has a 32 group limit, limit