similar to: Samba 3.0 as Active Directory Domain Controller with MIT Kerberos

Hi All- Please pardon my repost of my usenet article in this list. Previously, I asked if Samba 3.0 could be an Active Directory Domain Controller (ADDC). I have the feeling that the answer is no. If so, then I have this other question: Can I use Samba as an NT4 PDC for making a Windows NT4 domain that would host several M$ Windows XPP client computers as domain clients/members, but have

John, We previously corresponded on our testing of Samba 3.0.0 RC4. Since then, we have downloaded the Samba 3.0.0 Release version for testing with some interesting results. The Setup Major Networks: Solaris (NIS), Windows Native NT4 Domain Our Test Plan We are testing Samba 3.0 as a candidate for replacing the old NT4 Domain. Being a complex production networking environment, we replicated

I have been following the development ot Samba 3.0 with great interest. There is something that still confuses me. Can Samba 3.0 join a Windows 2000 network as a domain controller and replicate Active Directory information with existing Windows 2000 domain controllers? If Samba 3.0 is the only domain controller on a network with Windows 2000/XP clients, will the clients see it as a domain

As per earlier post, I was having problems getting trusts setup between my Samba domain (3.0.x PDC, 3.4.x BDC on Solaris 10) and two Active Directory domains (each in a separate forest.) One domain is a test Win 2003 PDC in native Win 2003 mode, the other is a Win 2008 system also in native Win 2003 mode. To summarize some of the progess- things work better if the Samba 3.4 is the PDC,

Hello all, I'm setting up a domain using Samba 3.0 as PDC, with WinXP clients. One of these clients is a laptop, which should be able to use cached profiles of the domain users. Online logon is working fine, however when the domain server is not available it cannot logon, whereas it should be able to use cached credentials to access the cached profile. Windows says it cannot log on because

Hi, I'm new to this list so I apologise if this has been asked before. I'm trying to compile samba 2.2.7 with kerberos support. I have MIT Kerberos 1.2.6 installed and working as a KDC but when I samba wont compile with --with-krb5 configure works ok and finds the kerberos install but when I do a make I get this error on linking smbd: /usr/local/lib/libkadm5srv.so: undefined reference

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of: DAHDI-Linux 2.6.1 DAHDI-Linux 2.5.1 DAHDI-Tools 2.6.1 DAHDI-Tools 2.5.1 DAHDI-Linux-Complete 2.6.1+2.6.1 DAHDI-Linux-Complete 2.5.1+2.5.1 These releases are available for immediate download at: http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-tools

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of: DAHDI-Linux 2.6.1 DAHDI-Linux 2.5.1 DAHDI-Tools 2.6.1 DAHDI-Tools 2.5.1 DAHDI-Linux-Complete 2.6.1+2.6.1 DAHDI-Linux-Complete 2.5.1+2.5.1 These releases are available for immediate download at: http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-tools

I think I understand what Active Directory is all about. I understand LDAP and I understand Kerberos. I can see how AD (well, Kerberos actually) enables single-sign-on (I assume it deals in tickets with the Windows clients as standard Kerberos clients do) and can make life easy in a large network (which, IIRC was one of the design goals of Kerberos in the first place). But lets say I have a

Hi. I am using gentoo kernel 2.6.27-r2 and dahdi trunk svn 5211 and it will not compile with this kernel whereas it does compile with 2.6.25. Here is the relevant portion of the build: VERIFY /usr/src/dahdi-trunk/drivers/dahdi/xpp/init_card_1_30 VERIFY /usr/src/dahdi-trunk/drivers/dahdi/xpp/init_card_2_30 VERIFY /usr/src/dahdi-trunk/drivers/dahdi/xpp/init_card_3_30 VERIFY

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of: DAHDI-Linux-v2.8.0-rc5 DAHDI-Tools-v2.8.0-rc5 dahdi-linux-complete-2.8.0-rc5+2.8.0-rc5 This release is available for immediate download at: http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-tools http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux-complete *** THIS RC FIXES

The Asterisk Development Team has announced the releases of: DAHDI-Linux-v2.8.0-rc5 DAHDI-Tools-v2.8.0-rc5 dahdi-linux-complete-2.8.0-rc5+2.8.0-rc5 This release is available for immediate download at: http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-tools http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/dahdi-linux-complete *** THIS RC FIXES

I'm having difficulties getting zaptel to compile. I've compiled it in the past and never had any difficulties to speak of, but on this particular machine I have problems. The OS configuration is the same as I've used in the past and the hardware is identical. Obviously there's some subtle difference (probably with the packages installed, but I haven't been able to locate

Hello Samba community! I have an legacy system with 7 Windows VM. In this system, the domain user is used to run services and interact with individual parts. I also have one PC on a domain from which I can run RSAT and can check the Zentyal webconfig. domain controller objectVersion: 47 #samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain Forest function level: (Windows)

I am getting the following compile error on centos 5. Any suggestions? Jerry CC [M] /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.o /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c: In function ?debugfs_open?: /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c:171: error: ?struct inode? has no member named ?u? /usr/src/digium/zaptel-1.4.1/xpp/xbus-core.c: In function ?proc_xbus_command_write?:

I am following the guide here: http://updates.xorcom.com/astribank/bristuff/1.4/bristuff-current/INSTALL.html for installing bristuff on a CentOS5.11 box (stock 2.6.18-398.el5.i686). Whilst building zaptel I get the error as follows: CC [M] /usr/src/bristuff-0.4.0-RC4-xr7/zaptel-1.4.12.9.svn.r4649/kernel/xpp/card_bri.o In file included from

Anyone else get this while compiling zaptel? I'm guessing I have to modify my kernel. Neato. :( Does that mean that the zaptel module (I'm really after ztdummy), or this xpp_zap thing won't be usable...? Not that I have zaptel hardware, but it seems Asterisk won't compile itself without zaptel being installed. CC [M] /root/software/zaptel-1.2.6/xpp/xpp_zap.o

I get the following error when trying to compile zaptel on CentOS 5 kernel 2.6.18-8.1.3.el5 CC [M] /root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.o /root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.c: In function ? /root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.c:171: error: ? has no member named ? make[3]: *** [/root/asterisk-src/zaptel-1.2.17.1/xpp/xbus-core.o] Error 1 make[2]: ***

CC [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/vpmadt032.o CC [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/GpakApi.o CC [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/../voicebus.o LD [M] /home/silentm/MessageNet/digium/zaptel-1.4.10/kernel/wcte12xp/wcte12xp.o

Hello, when compiling dahdi (CentOS 2.6.18-348.3.1.el5) I get the following error : In file included from /usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1/linux/drivers/dahdi/xpp/xpd.h:26, from /usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1/linux/drivers/dahdi/xpp/card_bri.c:29: /usr/src/dahdi-linux-complete-2.6.1+2.6.1/linux/drivers/dahdi/xpp/xdefs.h:152: error: conflicting types for