similar to: Dumb Question about Domains and PDC's

http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-October/113181.html This sounds exactly like what I'm experiencing... for the second time. I'm starting to think it happens whenever the AD folks create a new domain in the forest. (we just added our asia pacific region a couple days ago) Did you ever figure out what's happening? How did you resolve the issue? I remember last time I had

I work for a multi-billion dollar international organization currently using Novell technology for F&P/Directory/etc... A project has just arisen to develop several potential replacement proofs of concept. Several solutions are being evaluated, including: * Microsoft CIFS * Some NAS device using AD or eDirectory * Linux/Samba I was chosen as part of the Linux/Samba team and I'd like to

Do you have some comparasion of IO performance on thin pool vs. qcow2 file on fs? In my case each VM would have its own thin volume. I just want to overcommit disk-space. Regards, Jan On 2017-11-07 13:16 +0300, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: >Please don't use lvm thin for vm. In our hosting in Russia we have >100-150 vps on each node with lvm thin pool on ssd and have locks, >slowdowns

Hi guys, I''m running a freenas domU (FreeBSD 8.3 based, ZFS v28, 2 vcpus mapped to the same HT capable core) to serve storage for all purpose including other domUs running on the same host. I did some study to understand how well it works and the result is kind of confusing. In summary, the network performance between domains on the same host is worse than expected. And NFS service to

Hi, I'm looking to replace our existing Samba 2.X.X PDC with version 3.0.20. I would like to configure and test the new PDC with our existing ldap server on our network. Is it possible to have two working PDC's running on the same network at the same time. Will the new PDC cause any problems with the existing PDC and user logins? - Golden

Morning everyone. I have a question about something i've been thinking about lately. I recently rolled out a samba server running 2.2.8a with OpenLDAP 2.0.27 on the backend to hold the user account info. My question is, how many people out there are running samba as their PDC and have implemented a BDC as well? I'm starting to consider about putting up a BDC for safeties sake. Does

Could you install Exchange on a Samba PDC's network? What would happen if you tried to run /domainprep? Could Exchange interact with a LDAP backend? Would this be some sort of NT4/W2K mixed-mode directory services setup?

Hi All, I am currently running two PDC's with different domain names on the same network. But after a day of smooth running I am starting to have problems with the users accessing the network resources with an error message. As far I understand there must not be such conflict with the Samba PDC's with different domain names on the same subnet. Can any one suggest what might

You can have as many PDC's on a network with same subnet as you like keeping in mind they must have different domain names - ie workgroup = Cheers, Adrian Sender. >From: Golden Butler <golden@cnt.org> >To: Samba Mailing List <samba@lists.samba.org> >Subject: [Samba] 2 PDC's on same Network >Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:57:59 -0500 >Hi, > >I'm looking

Damn, My current new code (password server = "*") auto finds the PDC's, but then fails to connect for the domain authentication as I don't have the right "called name" (ie. the NetBIOS name of the PDC), just the IP address. Still working on the feature...... I have some ideas. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. --

Hello, as usual, I'm few years behind trends so I have learned about LVM thin volumes recently and I especially like that your volumes can be "sparse" - that you can have 1TB thin volume on 250GB VG/thin pool. Is it somehow possible to use that with libvirt? I have found this post from 2014: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2014-August/msg00010.html which says

I have been trying off and on for some time now to get an interdomain trust relationship going between two samba pdc machines (DomainA=trusted & DomainB=trusting). Both pdc's are running on Solaris boxes and NIS is involved (I doubt there is a NIS complication just because I can use accounts on DomainA on DomainB's samba, as long as I add them using smbpasswd manually). The situation

By now we had running samba as PDC and fileserver for about 20 NT4-clients with roaming profiles. Now we start migrating NT4-clients to XP-clients and as I found out roaming userprofiles between XP and NT4 is not possible (NT4->XP works, but not vice versa). So I just thought about cloning all the profiles (docs and mails are not in the profiles so only bookmarks, adressbook and

There appear to be significant hurdles to migrating from a Microsoft to Samba PDC environment, something which I've been trying to do now for many months. The difficulties arise in moving user's accounts over to Samba 1. Local profiles. It does not seem to be possible to move from an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC while retaining local profiles. NT4/W2k machines consider logons to the Samba PDC

The first release candidate of the 9.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available on the FTP servers for amd64, i386, and powerpc64. The MD5/SHA256 checksums are at the bottom of this message. The ISO images and, for architectures that support it, the memory stick images are available here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.1/ (or any of the FreeBSD mirror sites). Current

hello, yet another powerd SOS : on an ASUS M3A78-EM MB with Phenom 9750 and 8 gig memory, starting powerd freezes the box after slowing down a bit cpu frequency. [IMHO] usefull bit of info : FreeBSD m34.scito.local 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Dec 11 14:24:39 CET 2008 root@m34.scito.local:/usr/obj/raid1/bsd/src7/sys/M3A78-EM amd64 CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) 9750 Quad-Core