similar to: box standard kernel 2.2.x failes to mount cleanly unmounted ext3 partition

Hi all, first i want to say a big "Hello" to the list, since this is my first posting here. Yesterday i just installed another SAMBA server on a middle class (K6-2 500, 128MB) machine. All shares are accessable like expected but i often get an "Can't move file. File in use." error from my W2K client when moving large amount of files to the SAMBA server. This error

At the risk of stating the obvious but 2.2.3a is rather old - try updating to the latest stable 2.2.x series of Samba. After that you might want to look into the options relating to "Oplocks" >>I am wondering if anybody has expected the same problem before? The only idea i have is that this error occures because i have a lot of file and directory, chown, chmod directives in my

I used linux.0 from the pxe package of redhat linux 7.2. It's successfully boot vmlinuz-2.2.19, but when I try to boot vmlinuz-2.4.14, it reboots after Setup() call in linux.c The phrase "Uncompressing linux" does not appear. What I ought to do to successfully boot linux-2.4.14 kernel image? Best regards, Dmitry. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hello, I search through but I didn't find a clear answer about it. I have a rh 6.2 based box where I made many steps of upgrades. Some of them, not being available the binary rpm glibc 2.1 based, I obtained using src.rpm from rh 7.2 and then runnig #rpm --rebuild package.src.rpm and then installing the generated binary: great sw rpm!!! My rpm version is 4.0.2-6x for both rpm, rpm-devel,

Hi, I just tried the 2.6.22-r1 candidate to test whether some bug I have hit in the past still exists. I did use 2.6.20.6 so far. So, I have cleanly rebooted to use the new kernel, after the machine came up I tried to mess with the bug, and had to reboot again to play with kernel commandline parameters. Unfortunately, on the next reboot fsck was schedules on my filesystem after 38 clean

There have been offered several patches in order to forward Xinerama support to Xgl and patches for compiz to make use of it (like iXce's ones, which were ignored). So far the patched up compiz is working pretty good and makes it effectively usable in such setups (aside of that those patches will always drift away from official CVS and need to be touched for each commit). However it seems

Hi list ! A quick reaction to : > Dual-/multi-head support? After lots of inquiries you rudely brushed > that subject aside because "xinerama isn't really useful" and made it > pretty clear how much you valued the community: > ,---- > DR> I wont accept any xinerama patches, if you like to use xinerama > DR> until proper multi-screen support is implemented,

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66255 Priority: medium Bug ID: 66255 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Enabling Xinerama with nouveau driver causes Segmentation fault QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: critical Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)

Dear Devs, We have achieved a desktop of up to six monitors, with openGL running succesfully on the desktop, with the following setup/features: * Ubuntu 16+ * Xrandr * Noveau driver * Two gtx750 graphic cards Each (identical) graphic card has 2xHDMI + 2xDVI connectors, which we connect to the monitor array. So far it works with six monitors, but we'd like to achieve eight. However,

I've just test an ATI FirePro 2460 graphics card on CentOS 6.4. It connects 4 monitors. It worked with the standard radeon driver. I was able to arrange the monitors into my preferred configuration (as a square array, 1 upper left, 2 lower left, 3 lower right, 4 upper right) simply by clicking System -> Preferences -> Display, and then moving the four monitor images. This creates the

Full_Name: Thomas Zumbrunn Version: 2.6.1 OS: GNU/Linux (openSuse 10.3 2.6.22.13-0.3-default) Submission from: (NULL) (131.152.125.199) With my particular X11 settings, the width to height ratio of the x11 device is distorted, with the width being half that of the height. This results in wrongly proportioned plots, wrongly positioned text etc. Other devices are not affected. I already asked

Hi, I am starting to do some benchmarks using mongo (www.namesys.com), and I am surprised by the big difference between ext3/2.2.19 and ext3/2.4.14. Sometimes the latter performs 3 or 4 times faster. Someone has similar results or is there something wrong in my test ? Attached is the benchmark. By the way, during the test, I got the message kernel: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,10)) in

Is it practical to get a R/W file handle opened against an existing file on an unmounted ext2 filesystem? -- Chuck Wolber Electronic Flight Bag Crew Information Systems/ Linux Wonk 253.576.1154 "You can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards." --Steve Jobs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47556 Bug #: 47556 Summary: nouveau driver can`t handle xrandr requests Classification: Unclassified Product: xorg Version: 7.6 (2010.12) Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

When using Xinerama, RandR is automatically disabled, and calling RR routines will trigger an assert() because the RR keys/resources are not set, leading to an Xserver abort. Hotplug makes little sense without RandR, so no need to install a udev monitor if RandR is not available. Ported from intel driver, original work by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> Bugzilla:

On 05/07/2017 11:12 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Sampsa Riikonen <sampsa.riikonen at iki.fi> wrote: >> Dear Devs, >> >> We have achieved a desktop of up to six monitors, with openGL running >> succesfully on the desktop, with the following setup/features: >> >> * Ubuntu 16+ >> * Xrandr >> * Noveau driver >>

Hi I am trying to compile compiz 0.5.0 on SLED 10 SP1. I have installed all the requirements as per the docs but when I run ./configure I get the following error: checking for COMPIZ... configure: error: Package requirements (libpng xcomposite xfixes xdamage xrandr xinerama ice sm

I've seen that a lot of inaccurate and faulty information about this. All technical reasons (alternative configuration system, alternative decorator, xinerama...) for this fork are incorrect and I know that at least Quinn Storm is aware of this, based on a phone conversation we had last week. I've designed compiz to be extremely extensible. The plugin system should allow people to do

Hello Since I changed my X11 settings to a Xinerama setup, calls to x11() result in windows with a width half the size of the one specified by the corresponding parameter. Furthermore, x axis labels are overlapping. Other devices (e.g. pdf()), are not affected by these distortions. Did anybody have the same problem, and if so, how did you solve it? ( I'm using openSUSE 10.3 on a x86

User got upgraded to 6.4. Graphical mode video fails. It's an AMD (nee ATI) RV620 (FirePro 2260). So I finished upgrading everything, including kmod-fglrx. Based on the xorg.conf's on there, it's been using the fglrx. Now, in Xorg.0.log, it tells me "no supported AMD display adapters were found". I've been on-and-off googling for hours, and can't figure out if the