Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "3.0.1pre1 broke my 'valid users' on one share"
2003 Oct 26
0
Fixed: 3.0.1pre1 broke my 'valid users' on one share
Setting 'winbind use default domain = no' and adjusting my share access to
use the DOMAIN+ prefix fixed the problem.
There must be some portions of samba which are not friendly with this
option, yet.
The main reason why I like this option being, when ADS user's login to my
server via ssh they can use the username alone, instead of prepending
'DOMAIN+'
-----Original
2003 Nov 04
1
Solaris, Samba-3.0.1pre1 Compile error
Hello all, I currently run Samba 3.0 on a Solaris 9 machine in a production
environment. I'm happy with it.
I tried compiling samba-3.0.1pre1 using ./configure --with-ldap=no.
However when it gets to linking bin/tdbbackup it fails. This is the error it
gives:
Using FLAGS = -O -I./popt -Iinclude
-I/scratch/build/samba-3.0.1pre1/source/include
2003 Aug 27
2
Windows 2003 + winbind = hell
Hi,
I want to set up authentication using samba 2.2.7 winbind and pam with
Windows 2003.
The Windows 2003 server is set up in "mixed mode".
I follow the HOWTO, set up smb.conf and join the samba server to the domain.
I hit a road block when 'getent passwd' yields no active directory users.
I have been trying to get this running for two days, and I am beginning to
think
2003 Sep 02
2
Realm = or workgroup = ?
I think samba is cool.
I'm trying to understand the relationship between these 3 options:
Realm = MYGROUP.COM
Security = ADS
Workgroup = MYGROUP
And my samba file server is a member of AD
My server is W3K
Nothing seemed to work until I specified the realm
Do I also NEED the workgroup parameter ?
Shouldn't the workgroup and realm parameters exclusive from each other ?
-aaron
2003 Aug 26
3
Ads server = huh?
All,
I've installed a Redhat 9 system with all packages from 3 discs.
Now I've removed my samba 2 related packages and installed samba 3 using
rpm.
After setting up kerberos with my W2k system and testing that out
successfully
I set up smb.conf with security = ads etc
I've also set 'ads server' but this config option causes various samba
binaries to report
"unknown
2011 Jun 23
1
Finding the "levels" in a data frame column
I have a data frame that looks as follows.
df <- data.frame(city=c("Houston", "Houston", "El Paso", "Waco", Houston",
"Plano", "Plano")
What I want to do is get a list of the city values. Currently, when I run
df$city, I get all the values.
I just want to know the four cities that appear.
So instead of: "Houston",
2020 Jul 13
2
net rpc rights grant fail to connect 127.0.0.1
Hello!
Ok! I switch the IP inside Member AD
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
*> 10.1.1.16 * E-PLANO.ad.mydomain.br e-plano
Only to clarify
10.1.1.16 - AD Member - File server
10.1.1.21 - Only AD-DC
But, sorry!
Follow the wiki
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
The command:
# net rpc rights grant "SAMDOM\Unix Admins" SeDiskOperatorPrivilege -U
2020 Jul 13
3
net rpc rights grant fail to connect 127.0.0.1
Ok, im bit confused, sorry,.
Ehen i look that the below output, then i see there are multiple things suspecting to go wrong here.
?
For example this is a mismatch..? especialy hostname -i & -I? these should be the same or -I should show both.
?
Now, if this is the member i would have expected something like this.
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
10.1.1.16?????? E-PLANO.ad.mydomain.br
2020 Jul 13
0
net rpc rights grant fail to connect 127.0.0.1
On 13/07/2020 18:50, Andrew Walker wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:26 PM Rowland penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote:
>
> On 13/07/2020 18:18, Douglas G. Oechsler wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Ok! I switch the IP inside Member AD
> > > 127.0.0.1 localhost
2020 Jul 13
1
net rpc rights grant fail to connect 127.0.0.1
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:04 PM Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 13/07/2020 18:50, Andrew Walker wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:26 PM Rowland penny via samba
> > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 13/07/2020 18:18, Douglas G. Oechsler wrote:
>
2020 Jul 13
2
net rpc rights grant fail to connect 127.0.0.1
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 1:26 PM Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 13/07/2020 18:18, Douglas G. Oechsler wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Ok! I switch the IP inside Member AD
> > > 127.0.0.1 localhost
> > *> 10.1.1.16 * E-PLANO.ad.mydomain.br <http://E-PLANO.ad.mydomain.br>
> > e-plano
> >
> >
2003 Nov 03
4
Samba-3.0.1pre1 and LDAP
Hiya,
I have recently upgrade samba to 3.0.1pre1 from alpha3-19. The upgrade went well with no real problems, except .....
I have noticed today that the load on the LDAP server is extremely high. CPU usage on slapd is anywhere between 10%-80%. At one point to day everything came to a grinding halt. The only difference between I can think of is the samba upgrade. This is with an average load of
2020 Jul 13
0
net rpc rights grant fail to connect 127.0.0.1
On 13/07/2020 18:18, Douglas G. Oechsler wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Ok! I switch the IP inside Member AD
> > 127.0.0.1 localhost
> *> 10.1.1.16 * E-PLANO.ad.mydomain.br <http://E-PLANO.ad.mydomain.br>
> e-plano
>
> Only to clarify
> 10.1.1.16 - AD Member - File server
> 10.1.1.21 - Only AD-DC
>
> But, sorry!
> Follow the wiki
>
2017 Apr 29
3
Ingresar datos dentro de R sin Excel
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Mmm, Si te refieres a pasar datos de papel directamente a R en el ordenador... yo los pasaria directamente a un archivo de texto plano, que vendría a llevar el mismo tiempo, y los cargaría en R. No es Bueno tener los datos solo en R
2008 Mar 25
0
Rsync 3.0.1pre1 released
I have just released rsync 3.0.1pre1 for release testing. This is a
bug-fix release, which includes fixes/improvements for several issues
in the daemon-exclude code.
Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list
with any questions, comments, or bug reports.
To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.0, visit this link:
2008 Mar 25
0
Rsync 3.0.1pre1 released
I have just released rsync 3.0.1pre1 for release testing. This is a
bug-fix release, which includes fixes/improvements for several issues
in the daemon-exclude code.
Please test this new release and send email to the rsync mailing list
with any questions, comments, or bug reports.
To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.0, visit this link:
2020 Jul 13
0
net rpc rights grant fail to connect 127.0.0.1
On 13/07/2020 15:55, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> Ok, im bit confused, sorry,.
> Ehen i look that the below output, then i see there are multiple things suspecting to go wrong here.
>
> For example this is a mismatch..? especialy hostname -i & -I? these should be the same or -I should show both.
>
> Now, if this is the member i would have expected something like
2003 Sep 14
1
"home folder" v.s. regular drive mappings
Hey, has anyone on the list experienced the following behavior ?
When \\server\userhome <\\server\userhome> is specified as the "home
folder" in the AD user profile, XP takes a long time to open up "my
computer"
But when \\server\userhome <\\server\userhome> is mapped via a netlogon
script, XP opens "my computer" quickly
I've searched ms technet
2015 Aug 06
2
Duda interpolación (package ' gstat ')
Sale plano sí.
Ya se que sin tener los datos y el código es un poco difícil, pero es que mis datos ocupan mucho, es imposible.
Seguiré mirando por internet.
Muchas gracias Rubén.
Un saludo,
> To: r-help-es en r-project.org
> From: rubenfcasal en gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:21:47 +0200
> Subject: Re: [R-es] Duda interpolación (package ' gstat ')
>
> Hola
2017 Apr 05
2
Servicios en la nube
Buenas, me gustaría saber su experiencia sobre servicios en la nube.
Se que hay varios que usan los servicios de MS Azure. Tengo una duda
respecto a eso, funciona como una maquina virtual, no? Lo que significa
que para correr procesos debo estar conectado a la maquina, o puedo
dejar corriendo procesos en segundo plano y volver luego para ver el
resultado.
Saludos y muchas gracias!
--