Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Hard disk write cache?"
2002 Jan 15
9
Ext3 vs. Reiser?
Hi!
I was just wondering how Ext3 and Reiserfs compare. When I reinstalled my
server (because of a stupid hacker) I took the opportunity to change to
ReiserFS. And I have to say it's really much faster than Ext3.
I don't have benchmarks, but for example, stuff like "make dep" on the linux
kernel is much faster (even though I had enabled write cache when I was
using ext3).
So
2001 Nov 08
3
Size of .journal file for embedded linux
Hi
I am running kernel 2.4.13 with ext3 support on an embedded system with 64
MB Flash and
the .journal file takes size as 4 MB.
Is it possible to minimize the .journal file ?
With best regards/ Med venlig hilsen
John Nørgaard
2005 May 06
2
Encoder performance on ARM9
Hi there,
I've just started to work with the great speex encoder on ARM9-based
embedded platform. This is my configuration:
CPU: Cirrus Logic EP9315 @ 200 MHz (ARM920T)
o.s.: Linux 2.6.9-rc2-ep93xx
GCC: gcc version 3.3.3 (DENX ELDK 3.1 3.3.3-10) without MaverickCrunch support
ogg library: 1.0
speex command line configuration: ./configure --enable-fixed-point
--enable-arm4-asm
The code is
2001 Dec 10
1
ext3 mounted as ext2
Hi,
Also I do have some problems mounting an ext3fs which gets just mounted
as an ext2fs. (Yeap, I looked a little bit around in the mailling list
and found similiar problems which haven't help me ;-( )
I have a root ( /) and a /mnt partition. both are converted via tune2fs
-j into a journaled fs.
my fstab looks like this:
/dev/hda1 / ext2 defaults
2001 Nov 20
2
pivot_root problem on RH7.2
Hello,
I'm new in ext3. I installed RH7.2 with ext3. For a short time it
worked properly, but when I compiled the linux kernel (2.4.9-13) from RH
package, the old kernel didn't boot again (I didn't change anything with
the old binary).
I downloaded kernel 2.4.14 and ext3 patch for this version. After
the compilation and installation I rebooted the system. I got answer
something
2001 Oct 28
8
Ext3 partition not appearing in df output
Hello,
I converted my / partition to ext3 from ext2 today, and I'm using kernel
2.4.13+ext3 patch
I used tune2fs -j and set the filesystem to auto in fstab, and compiled ext2
as well as ext3 in the kernel
Upon rebooting, I tried df -hT to see if it had worked, and to my surprise it
didn't list my root partition
dmesg say it's fine (and btw everything works fine)
kjournald
2020 Aug 06
0
[PATCH nbdkit] Experiment with parallel python plugin
This is a quick hack to experiment with parallel threading model in the
python plugin.
Changes:
- Use aligned buffers to make it possible to use O_DIRECT. Using
parallel I/O does not buy us much when using buffered I/O. pwrite()
copies data to the page cache, and pread() reads data from the page
cache.
- Disable extents in the file plugin. This way we can compare it with
the python
2020 Aug 06
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit] Experiment with parallel python plugin
On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 11:22:00PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
> This is a quick hack to experiment with parallel threading model in the
> python plugin.
>
> Changes:
>
> - Use aligned buffers to make it possible to use O_DIRECT. Using
> parallel I/O does not buy us much when using buffered I/O. pwrite()
> copies data to the page cache, and pread() reads data from the
2014 Jan 14
4
[LLVMdev] 16-bit x86 status update
I just want to state that I hope we never implement the 16-bit Microsoft
C++ ABI for -m16.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
> Absolutely fantastic work, David. Thank you!
>
> On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:35 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > Here's a brief update on the current state of 16-bit x86
2020 Aug 06
2
[PATCH nbdkit] Experiment with parallel python plugin
This is a quick hack to experiment with parallel threading model in the
python plugin.
Changes:
- Use aligned buffers to make it possible to use O_DIRECT. Using
parallel I/O does not buy us much when using buffered I/O. pwrite()
copies data to the page cache, and pread() reads data from the page
cache.
- Disable extents in the file plugin. This way we can compare it with
the python
2014 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] 16-bit x86 status update
Here's a brief update on the current state of 16-bit x86 support...
The assembler has support for the .code16 directive and can happily
output 16-bit code. In pending patches¹ I have also added an
i386-*-*-code16 triple and fixed the disassembler to support 16-bit mode
(which was previously present, but could not be invoked and was fairly
broken). And added a '-m16' option to clang.
2013 Jul 13
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] x86: disambiguate unqualified btr, bts
Eli Friedman wrote:
> The reason it's the right thing to do is that the mem/imm forms of
> btsw and btsl have exactly the same semantics.
The Intel documentation implies that this is the case:
> If the bit base operand specifies a memory location, it represents the address of the byte in memory that contains the bit base (bit 0 of the specified byte) of the bit string (see Figure
2007 Aug 23
1
How are the Syslinux Screen Shots Taken?...
How are the screenshots at syslinux's homepage taken? I would like to take some of my extlinux setup for my usb to archive as well as show to my friends. Also for the pictures under
syslinux-3.51/sample/
"syslinux_splash.jpg" and "m16-640x640-syslinux.jpg" could someone edit the text for it to say extlinux instead(or the original pics)? also any other places to find cool
2012 Nov 15
1
[LLVMdev] potential mach_override/mach_override.c fix
In testing build patches for gcc 4.8 to allow darwin to have asan support,
I ran across a defect in mach_override/mach_override.c...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289#c27
which was solved with the patch proposed by Alexander Potapenko in...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289#c29
Index: mach_override.c
2017 Sep 08
2
Dovecot and Letsencrypt certs
On 08 Sep 2017, at 10:08, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote:
> What is Dovecot supposed to do? Keep track of the certificate expiry
> date? And if that is passed, then what? Automatically shutdown/restart?
> What if the certificate has not been updated in between? I think that
> handling certificates is better left to the administrator.
How I would do it is
2017 Sep 08
1
Dovecot and Letsencrypt certs
On 08 Sep 2017, at 12:21, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote:
> On 08.09.2017 19:51, @lbutlr wrote:
>> How I would do it is IF the certificate is expired, the dovecot should
>> check if there is a new cert and if so, load it.
> New cert as in file modification date or checksum changed?
Either one, but checksum is going to be more reliable.
> Might
2018 Dec 05
1
BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
please send mail to dovecot-unsubscribe at dovecot.org
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: "?????? . via dovecot" <dovecot at dovecot.org> Date: 05/12/2018 08:26 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re[2]: BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag
Unsubscribe me please.
I've been seeing these messages for several days and
2017 Aug 09
4
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
Cheers Remko and Ralph. I think there was some mention in the lets encrypt FAQ that certbot doesn't do email.
But I understand I can use their generated very for dovecot, postfix and https? That would be good indeed.
Anyone know of any manual, or can I just replace the certs in the dovecot and postfix locations with theirs? Do dovecot, postfix and apache all support .pem format?
Sent from
2017 Aug 09
3
is a self signed certificate always invalid the first time?
Thanks Ralph, i?ll look into that.
I think let?s encrypt uses certbot though and it can?t do email certificates (although i?m sure i can convert the cert i get from let?s encrypt, i?ll look into it.
> On 9 Aug 2017, at 16:40, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote:
>
> On 09.08.2017 17:20, Alef Veld wrote:
>
>> So i?m using dovecot, and i created a self
2014 Jan 06
3
[LLVMdev] Why do X86_32TargetMachine and X86_64TargetMachine classes exist?
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 14:23 -0800, Jim Grosbach wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> AFAIK, the answer is basically “because it’s always been that way.” I
> seem to recall there were some things that were different (data layout
> string and such), but that could also be parameterized if it hasn’t
> been already by the recent refactorings, I suppose.
It is *all* now parameterized. The classes