similar to: Samba 3.0 + LDAP as PDC

----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467 John H Terpstra <jht@samba.org>

Howdy Folks, I'm working on implimenting centralized authentication for a mixed environment: - Samba(3.0rc4) -> Win2k/XP OpenLDAP User Store -> - nss_ldap -> linux/unix - FreeRadius -> Cisco/HP Networking Equip (My apologies if that doesn't look right for anyone) I have a functional ldap database (openldap-2.0.27-8), and I'd very much like to use Samba 3.x (been

First, the software: Samba 3.0.0 OpenLDAP 2.0.27 nssldap / pam_ldap Redhat 9 This may be more of a question for the OpenLDAP mailing list.. but does anyone know of a method (perhaps using slappasswd?) to hand-sync userPassword attributes to sambaNTPassword attributes? Deploying Samba 3.0 as pdc pretty soon, used Migration Tools on the mail server soon, and I'd really like to be able to tell

Before I begin, big thanks to John Terpstra for helping me out with my previous issues. But alas I have another issue, I need to enforce strong passwords on windows side (i.e. ctrl+alt+delete change password), minimum password length, can't be dictionary words, etc. etc. (Setup is Samba 3.0.0 as PDC with LDAP passdb) >From what I undersatnd previously this could've been done using

Software: OS: Redhat 9 Samba Ver: Samba 3.0.0 (Plus excel writelock patch, waiting for 3.0.2!) OpenLDAP Ver: 2.0.27-8 Just a quick question about PDC / BDC interaction, my plan is to distribute Samba (with slave ldap backend) BDCs to remote facilities, as well as have one on each network segment in the hopes of avoiding unnecessary nmb broadcast traffic. My question is this: Will the PDC /

Cool, thanks alot, I really appreciate your time. I'm extremely pleased with 3.0.x's stability, I don't think local segment failover is really going to be a huge issue. Keep up the great work :) -- Cy > > > > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:14:36 +1100 > From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> > To: Cybr0t McWhulf <cybre@killcybre.org> > Cc:

Hi Everyone, My doubts are for Samba4.1 performance related enhancements (SMB2.1 / SMB3.0). My experimental samba server hardware is running 4.1 version. Want to improve robocopy WRITE throughput from a two samba client machines (win7 or win8 or server2012 x86 servers). Someone please advice me how can I use SMB2.1 or SMB3.0 capabilities to improve WRITE throughput. I tried samba4.1

Hi All: I am an newcomer,I have a question that the lastest version of samba can suport the SMB3.0 ? Can suport SMB3.0's persistent File Handles feature? I am test the SMB3.0 Transparent Failover in winserver 2012. Docs says that Failover need client and server all surport SMB3.0. Can I user samba instead of SMB server? Thanks Jiademing

We have a project about Microsoft Hyper-V by using our storage. We want to use Samba to share our storage to Hyper-V. And we know from Microsoft homepage hyper-v(windows 2012) only support smb3.0 protocol, but right now the newest version of Samba don?t? fully support SMB3.0 protocol. I tried the version of Samba4.0.6, Samba3.6.9, but both failed to create virtual hosts using Hyper-V.

Software: - Samba 3.0 (Stable) - OpenLDAP 2.0.27 - Windows 2000 clients I'd like to impliment full-blown nt-style permissions on my existing Samba (with LDAP backend) server / shares. (i.e. file properties--> security: different groups / users, with different permissions etc. etc.) Now I've dug around and found that this can be supported either via ext2/3 + some ACL patch (anyone got

Basically, have an old IVR application running under Apex's Omnivox software on a box with 4 old intel dialogic D240SCs, and would like to allow remote clients to gain access to aforementioned IVR application via softphone, 7960, ata, etc via asterisk with a TE410P. Unfortunately, all I know about the dialogics is that they're configured for D4/AMI, which I believe I have configured right

OS / Software: PDC / Master LDAP store: - Redhat 9 - OpenLDAP 2.1.25 - Samba 3.0.0 BDC / Slave LDAP store: - Redat 9 - OpenLDAP 2.0.27-8 - Samba 3.0.2 >From the Samba HOWTO Collection on www.samba.org: (Backup Domain Control) "Can I Do This All with LDAP? The simple answer is yes. Samba's pdb_ldap code supports binding to a replica LDAP server, and will also follow

Thanks for the reply. I was checking this with several IT professionals and the consensus was that it should never be exposed over the internet (even SMB3.0) and they all recommended to use it over SSH or VPN. A couple of people said there are more security professionals venting/using/supporting SSH which is why they recommend using that. I was just wondering, would this just be the leftover

hi Michael, Sorry for taking so long to reply, I just get back on vacation. Your advice is very helpful. Our purpose is no IO interrupted with Window 7 cifs client accessing the shared folder when virtual IP taken over by another node. SMB3.0 or newer protocol do meet that demand, but Window 7 cifs client only supports SMB2.1 protocol and previous versions. So we need implement a

I want to achieve high availability with SMB3.0. Now ，if I shutdown the node of business , that ctdb will take over the public IP ,but the business will stop .I want to achieve the business not stop. My environment is: 1.samba version 4.7.0 2.The system is centos 7.0 3.The cluster is constitute of three nodes But I do not know how to configure samba and how to test it. Can you help me ? thank

Hello, How secure is SMB3 over Internet? I see that Microsoft Azure is doing SMB3 shares over internet so they seem to think it's secure. Does the SAMBA team recommend this type of scenario OR do they recommend instead running it over a SSH tunnel/VPN?

hi Michael： We want to implement the ‘persistent handle’ function under Windows 7(SMB 2.1), which has only local ‘durable handle’. For now my plan is just to synchronize the following files between cluster nodes: smbXsrv_open_global.tdb.0 smbXsrv_session_global.tdb.0 smbXsrv_tcon_global.tdb.0 locking.tdb.0 It probably won’t be completed, so I’m writing to ask for your advice. Any help would be

Dear All, I manage a Debian Squeeze GNU/Linux (with kernel 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP) with Samba 3.5.6 (samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze8 package is installed). I have a "test" directory with native Linux ACL permissions. getfacl test's output: # file: test # owner: akos # group: grp # flags: -s- user::rwx group::rwx group:read:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx

I want to have SMB server to authenticate all my users. Problem is that I have 8 Win98SE workstations and 2 XP Home laptops. I know XP Home won't do domain log-ons. What are my options (I would realy hate giving M$ more money by upgrading laptops to PRO)? How can I do user based log-ins in that kind of environment? Thanks, Apollo

I need a client for Solaris 10 u11 that will allow me to mount encrypted shares located on a EMC VNXe3200 Thank you for your time ! Charles Corpany Charles.Corpany at ngc.com<mailto:Charles.Corpany at ngc.com> Information Systems Sector, Civil Division - VITA Program Northrop Grumman Corporation Virginia Department of Health Datacenter James Madison Bld, Upper Basement, UB20E 109