similar to: 3.0rc4 + ldap backend (Advice? Suggestions?)

Cool, thanks alot, I really appreciate your time. I'm extremely pleased with 3.0.x's stability, I don't think local segment failover is really going to be a huge issue. Keep up the great work :) -- Cy > > > > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:14:36 +1100 > From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> > To: Cybr0t McWhulf <cybre@killcybre.org> > Cc:

Software: OS: Redhat 9 Samba Ver: Samba 3.0.0 (Plus excel writelock patch, waiting for 3.0.2!) OpenLDAP Ver: 2.0.27-8 Just a quick question about PDC / BDC interaction, my plan is to distribute Samba (with slave ldap backend) BDCs to remote facilities, as well as have one on each network segment in the hopes of avoiding unnecessary nmb broadcast traffic. My question is this: Will the PDC /

----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467 John H Terpstra <jht@samba.org>

First, the software: Samba 3.0.0 OpenLDAP 2.0.27 nssldap / pam_ldap Redhat 9 This may be more of a question for the OpenLDAP mailing list.. but does anyone know of a method (perhaps using slappasswd?) to hand-sync userPassword attributes to sambaNTPassword attributes? Deploying Samba 3.0 as pdc pretty soon, used Migration Tools on the mail server soon, and I'd really like to be able to tell

Before I begin, big thanks to John Terpstra for helping me out with my previous issues. But alas I have another issue, I need to enforce strong passwords on windows side (i.e. ctrl+alt+delete change password), minimum password length, can't be dictionary words, etc. etc. (Setup is Samba 3.0.0 as PDC with LDAP passdb) >From what I undersatnd previously this could've been done using

At the risk of having my inbox flooded with another 10,000 Emails from "Microsoft" proporting the "latest security update".. Now that smb3.0 is out and about, I'd really like to use it for authenticating windows users / PDC (With BDC in the plans) My problem is that there seems to be little to zero up to date documentation on how to integrate Samba and LDAP, the most I

Software: - Samba 3.0 (Stable) - OpenLDAP 2.0.27 - Windows 2000 clients I'd like to impliment full-blown nt-style permissions on my existing Samba (with LDAP backend) server / shares. (i.e. file properties--> security: different groups / users, with different permissions etc. etc.) Now I've dug around and found that this can be supported either via ext2/3 + some ACL patch (anyone got

Basically, have an old IVR application running under Apex's Omnivox software on a box with 4 old intel dialogic D240SCs, and would like to allow remote clients to gain access to aforementioned IVR application via softphone, 7960, ata, etc via asterisk with a TE410P. Unfortunately, all I know about the dialogics is that they're configured for D4/AMI, which I believe I have configured right

OS / Software: PDC / Master LDAP store: - Redhat 9 - OpenLDAP 2.1.25 - Samba 3.0.0 BDC / Slave LDAP store: - Redat 9 - OpenLDAP 2.0.27-8 - Samba 3.0.2 >From the Samba HOWTO Collection on www.samba.org: (Backup Domain Control) "Can I Do This All with LDAP? The simple answer is yes. Samba's pdb_ldap code supports binding to a replica LDAP server, and will also follow

Hi, I have successfully built a shared version of LLVM (both 3.0rc4 and 2.9) on Windows 7 using MinGW. From there, I thought I would run the tests located under unittests (i.e. ADTTests, AnalysisTests, ExecutionEnginetests, JITTests, SupportTests, UtilsTests and VMCoreTests). All of them pass without any problem, except for JITTests which fails on the MultiJitTest.JitPool test:

2011/11/18 Alan Garny <alan.garny at dpag.ox.ac.uk>: > I have successfully built a shared version of LLVM (both 3.0rc4 and 2.9) on > Windows 7 using MinGW. From there, I thought I would run the tests located > under unittests (i.e. ADTTests, AnalysisTests, ExecutionEnginetests, > JITTests, SupportTests, UtilsTests and VMCoreTests). All of them pass > without any problem,

In response to: > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:24:16 +0100 > From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr<mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Follow-up questions after successful upgrade to > LLVM 3.0rc4 > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Hi Kevin, >> Since I don't have llvm-gcc installed, I tried to do the

In response to: > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:21:34 +0100 > From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr<mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Follow-up questions after successful upgrade to > LLVM 3.0rc4 > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Message-ID: <4ECC044E.3020202 at free.fr<mailto:4ECC044E.3020202 at

We were successful in upgrading our JIT project to LLVM 3.0rc4 last week, after initially struggling with the various usage and IR changes from V2.9. But we have some follow-up questions: 1) In spite of building and running our tests cleanly with DEBUG+ASSERTS and RELEASE builds, we consistently see a crash when we use a DEBUG build without ASSERTs. The crash appears whenever we use the

Dear all. I built the LLVM 3.0 rc4 with Clang front-end in windows os env. (also with -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=all option) For arm neon intrinsics testing, I tried to compile some codes, which are included a few neon intrinsics. Although I got a well done bitcode on ubuntu build pc, it shows some errors when compile the codes on windows. Could you let me know why occurred errors? is this just a

Summary: ---------------------- Hello, when using the MS NT SrvTools (User & Server Manager for Domains), I get an error when I try to access an individual user's properties ("The following error occurred while accessing the properties of the user <blah> \n The specified procedure could not be found \n The user properties cannot be edited or viewed at this time"); however,

Hi, I am implimenting a solution for a radio station where by calls are first received by an attendant, who interviews the caller and then places the call in a queue along with some information about the caller. The radio presenter can then choose which call to pick up depending on those in the queue. My question is, how can it be possible for call to skip other calls in the queue and be picked

I'm looking for a way to tag my live feeds via an audio announcement every 30 minutes or so using the Linux install of Icecast. Some of the feeds I control locally, and other feeds are from remote locations - so implimenting this must be as painless as possible for each encoding location. As of now, the best way I can think of to do this is by running 2 instances of Icecast. Allowing the

hello, can u please give me the code written in matlab for partial least square regression I tried implimenting it but could not succesful, will you pls provide me the code written in matlab and also the exlanatiion to each step Thnaking you. Mr Jivan shrikrishna Parab research scholar Electronics department Goa university [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have this problem... I am working on implimenting a school network. I have two kinds of users on my network: students and facutly. I have also two types of operating system on my network: win 98 and win XPP. Here is the rights and privilages I am thinking about giving my users Students (usage only in computer labs): - limited roaming profile (basically, deny desktop roaming profile) - give