similar to: Which mkfs tool can I use for an ext3 file system??

On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote: > I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. > > This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. > > I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. I would

Situation: two similar servers, both with CentOS 5.4 64-bit. Making an ext3 filesystem on one takes seconds, on the other minutes. Partition Size Server 1 Server 2 1 GB 0.7 sec 0.3 sec 4 GB 2.5 sec 1.2 sec 40 GB 15 sec 13 min WTF e2fsprogs RPM is e2fsprogs-1.39-23.el5 on both systems mkfs --version reports

I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List. The following is the mailing list exchange: On 09/18/2014 07:01 PM, Robert Nichols wrote: > On

Hi, I connected my harddisk which had ext3 filesystem and some files archived in it as slave device and issued "mkfs /dev/hdb2" accidentally. Immediately I issued Ctrl C and stopped the process. But before that it had deleted some 100 Blocks. After that I am unable to boot that hard disk as primary device. The system is asking me "please insert a valid boot device and press

Add the 'label' optional argument to the mkfs action, so it is possible to set a filesystem label direct when creating it. There may be filesystems not supporting changing the label of existing filesystems but only setting it at creation time, so this new optarg will help. Implement it for the most common filesystems (ext*, fat, ntfs, btrfs, xfs), giving an error for all the others, just

Hi, So I've been hacking together an nbdkit plugin (similar to the "file" plugin, but it splits the file up into chunks): https://github.com/pepaslabs/nbdkit-chunks-plugin I got it to the point of being a working prototype. Then I threw it onto a raspberry pi, which it turns out only has a 50/50 shot of fallocate() working correctly. I'm checking the return code of

I'm currently working with a testing system that involves running mkfs.ext3 on some pretty large devices on a regular basis. This is getting fairly painful, and I was wondering if there was some way to speed this up. Understood that the end result might be a filesystem that has less of a safety factor (say, fewer superblock backups) but the tradeoff might be worth it in this case. David

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > How about 'strace mkfs.ext2 ..' and see if any system calls are > returning errors. That would show you whether nbd-client is throwing > errors away, or whether mkfs is getting the errors and ignoring them > (seems pretty unlikely, but you never know). > > After that, it'd be down

we wipe the filesystem signatures from device before do mkfs, since we can't trust mkfs can remove the filesystem signature absolutely. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/mkfs.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/mkfs.c b/daemon/mkfs.c index 5475582..19224ec 100644 --- a/daemon/mkfs.c +++

Hello linuxers!!! I have a problem. I did format using mkfs.ext3 in /dev/hda1, and it's wrong. I want to format hda2. Now I lost all datas. How can I recover my hda1??? __________________________________________________________________________ Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela. AntiPop-up UOL - ? gr?tis! http://antipopup.uol.com.br/

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 07:56:37PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: > I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member. > > This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to > mkfs, > and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run. If none of the possible superblocks are valid when using mke2fs -b <NNN>, there's a good chance

Optimizations by reducing the STREQ operations and do some code cleanup. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/mkfs.c | 29 +++++++++++++---------------- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/mkfs.c b/daemon/mkfs.c index a2c2366..7757623 100644 --- a/daemon/mkfs.c +++ b/daemon/mkfs.c @@ -44,13 +44,16 @@ do_mkfs_opts (const

I can't seem to get the read and write performance better than approximately 40MB/s on an ext2 file system. IMO, this is horrible performance for a 6-drive, hardware RAID 5 array. Please have a look at what I'm doing and let me know if anybody has any suggestions on how to improve the performance... System specs: ----------------- 2 x 2.8GHz Xeons 6GB RAM 1 3ware 9500S-12 2 x 6-drive,

Dear Srs, I get this error when running "mkfs.ocfs2": ================================================================================= # mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4K -C 32K -N 255 -L backup_ocfs2_001 /dev/sdb1 mkfs.ocfs2 1.2.7 Filesystem label=backup_ocfs2_001 Block size=4096 (bits=12) Cluster size=32768 (bits=15) Volume size=6000488677376 (183120382 clusters) (1464963056 blocks) 5678 cluster

A way of disabling features that are on by default in case it''s not wanted, eg. due to lack of support in the used kernel. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> --- mkfs.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mkfs.c b/mkfs.c index cd0af9ef8b4f..f825e1b6bc2d 100644 --- a/mkfs.c +++ b/mkfs.c @@ -1168,7 +1168,11 @@ static int

Hi, Why does mkfs.ocfs2 take so long compared to gfs2 (pretty fast iirc), xfs (almost instantaneous), or ext3 (slow but still ok)? I'm using: # mkfs.ocfs2 -F -b 4k -C 4k -L san1 -T mail /dev/vg/san1 mkfs.ocfs2 1.3.9 Overwriting existing ocfs2 partition. WARNING: Cluster check disabled. Proceed (y/N): y Filesystem Type of mail Filesystem label=san1 Block size=4096 (bits=12) Cluster size=4096

I am wanting to use the mkfs.hfsplus as mentioned here http://www.oli.id.au/createosxdmgdiskimagesinlinux but I dont have the command. yum provides "*/mkfs.hfsplus" returns no packages found. Where do I find this command? Thanks. Jerry

Hi all, are there any plans that future versions of mkfs.btrfs will do an initial pre-discard for SSDs? (AFAIK mkfs.btrfs does not do this currently) For Ext4, mke2fs does this with the -E discard option. From the mke2fs manpage: -E discard Attempt to discard blocks at mkfs time (discarding blocks initially is useful on solid state devices and sparse / thin-provisioned storage). When

When I try and run the mkfs.ocfs2 command after I have updated all of the other nodes in the cluster with the new node information in cluster.conf I am getting the following error: mkfs.ocfs2 -b 4k -C 32K -L "ocfs2" -N 4 /dev/sdb1 mkfs.ocfs2 1.4.4 Cluster stack: classic o2cb Overwriting existing ocfs2 partition. mkfs.ocfs2: Could not create domain while initializing the dlm As this is

I was playing around with btrfs, and did a mkfs.btrfs on one of my partition. Mistakes, it was my data partition (ext3 based). I have not yet mounted the device, but the mkfs.btrfs continued to completion. Is it possible to salvage my ext3 filesystem? Anyway to reverse the effect of mkfs.btrfs? Thank you for your help/answer. -- Regards, Peter Teoh