similar to: Ext3, Raid5, and Quotas on 2.4.14?

Is anyone using Ext3 on a 2.4.x kernel with software raid5? Does it work correctly? Last I checked noone had tried it yet, but that was before I went away on vacation. -- Daniel R. Bidwell | bidwell@andrews.edu Andrews University Information Technology Services If two always agree, one of them is unnecessary "Friends don't let friends do DOS" "In theory, theory and practice

Using ubuntu 9.10 and libvir 0.7.0, when I do a migrate a domain from machine A to B, the migration "completes" but remains in a frozen state until I do a "suspend/resume" on it on B. Then it runs fully normally. What do I do to skip the suspend/resume steps? -- Daniel R. Bidwell | bidwell at andrews.edu Andrews University | Information Technology

I have two servers running Ubuntu 9.10, with shared disk from ISCSI SAN and OCFS2, identical network configurations, shared ssh keys, and pki keys. My vm will boot from either machine and run correctly. When I attempt to do a live migration with "migrate --live base32 qemu +[ssh/tcp]://vm1/system" it initiates the vm on the other server, but leaves the vm on the current server in the

Greetings R Help Group, How does one effect a multiphasic logistic growth model with 4 phases (e.g. Koops 1986; Weigel, Craig, Bidwell and Bates 1992; Grossman and Koops 2003) with R. Before writing to the group, the R help archives were searched, the web was searched with Google, Venables and Ripley 2002 was consulted, Pinheiro and Bates 2000 was consulted, Bates and Watts 2007 was bought and

I have two hosts, vm1 and vm2, which are both running libvirt 0.7.0. They share a common ocfs2 file system that resides on a san, and have identical network configurations. I am running qemu-kvm 0.11.0 on ubuntu 9.10 servers. I start base32 on vm1 and it comes up (it also runs fine if started on vm2). Then from vm2 I do: vm2#: virsh -c qemu://vm1/system migrate --live base32 qemu://vm2/system

Using lighttpd + fcgi to power a site. When no one has accessed it in a while, the first visit to the page takes a while to load up. Then subsequent visits are fairly fast. Any ideas on how to fix it?

Hi all, I have a question as to how I can show the full content of my rsync logs as opposed to what I see below: Why do my logs look truncated? 2008/07/11 19:45:34 [18816] <f..t.... htdocs/etc... 2008/07/11 19:45:34 [18816] <f..t.... htdocs/etc... 2008/07/11 19:45:34 [18816] <f.st.... htdocs/etc... 2008/07/11 19:45:34 [18816] <f..t.... htdocs/etc... 2008/07/11 19:45:34 [18816]

Hi all, I'm in the process of moving all of my RHEL systems over to CentOS but the argument that fires back at me is for critical vulnerabilities for items such as zero-day exploits and such. >From what I've been reading, RHEL releases critical patches much quicker than CentOS which makes sense since CentOS is simply a copy and when changes occur they propagate down to the RHEL clones.

Hey, Thanks for sending me the patch Wiktor, but I was looking for the patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz . If someone has that let me know. Does it work well with kernel 2.4.14 (any installation issues ?) . Why can't I download from http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3 page. If someone can zip the gz patch and email it to me that would be awesome. My email client acts up sometimes.

I just upgraded to kernel 2.4.14 and applied the ext3 patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz. It appears (to me) that the patch breaks the loop block device module (loop.o). The problem is that the call to deactivate_page is unresolved. The routine used to be defined in swap.c. It looks like it no longer exists in 2.4.14. I'm not a kernel programmer so if I'm mistaken, sorry. I do get an

Please CC me as I'm not subscribed. Attached is my kernel configuration. Please forgive me if this is being asked a gazillion times in the list. I'm using the 2.4.14 patch found at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ . ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux-2.4.14/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \

If I patch the 2.4.14 kernel with the grsecurity patch first I get errors while patching the ext3 patch. the link for the grsecuritypatch is http://www.grsecurity.net/download.htm (which ever patch I do first works fine..the onther patch fails) this is the error I get fro patching the ext3 patch second (I get an error inthe same place if I patch the grsecurity patch second) Hunk #1 FAILED at

I am using 2.4.14 and the ext3 patch to go along with it and yesterday I got the following error. Nov 16 20:14:19 ccs kernel: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,72)): ext3_new_block: Allocating block in system zone - block = 394173 Well, I immediately went into maintainance mode and checked the file system and there were plenty of errors including a duplicate block and other stuff. I am not sure, is

Hi, I am starting to do some benchmarks using mongo (www.namesys.com), and I am surprised by the big difference between ext3/2.2.19 and ext3/2.4.14. Sometimes the latter performs 3 or 4 times faster. Someone has similar results or is there something wrong in my test ? Attached is the benchmark. By the way, during the test, I got the message kernel: EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,10)) in

Hi All, Can I backport 2.4.20 kernel version''s HTB related changes to 2.4.14 ? Will this work w/o any issues ? Please consider this urgent and replay asap. Thanks in advance, Reema. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi, I am using linux 2.4.14 box for my bandwidth management.I patched the kernel for HTB support.I think HTB comes by default with 2.4.20.My doubt is "Is there any performance difference between patched kernel i.e. 2.4.14 and unpatched kernel 2.4.20 with respect to bandwidth management ?" Thanks in advance, Aravind. Yahoo! India Careers: Over 50,000 jobsonline.

Download details and documentation are at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ Changes since ext3-0.9.13 (which was against linux-2.4.13): - Fixed a null-pointer dereference oops which could hit on SMP machines. This fix was applied to 2.4.12-ac6, but the oops has never been reported against -ac kernels. - Large amounts of developer debug code has been removed. This will now be

i have patched the kernel and recompiled the kernel with the ext3 support, however, when i boot up, i get this error below, what have i missed ? request_module[block-major-3]: Root fs not mounted VFS: Cannot open root device "hda6" or 03:06 Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:06

Good morning, I have tried to compile a 2.4.14 kernel (because I have some trouble with the framebuffer and my Toshiba...). Thus, I have downloaded the latest kernel and the ext3 patch. I have used the .config file used for the compilation of my 2.4.13 kernel, but the compilation ends with make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/usr/src/linux-2.4.14/arch/i386/lib' ld -m elf_i386 -T

Hello! I got oops after about 3 hours of uptime. Load was about 1,5. This is output of ksymoops after forced reboot if it helps someone. :-) ksymoops 2.4.0 on i686 2.4.14-pre8. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.14-pre8/ (default) -m /boot/System.map-2.4.14-pre8 (default) Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on