similar to: Re: [SLE] Any way to do Linux User home directories via Samba

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Message: 15 >> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:29:41 -0500 >> From: Jason Joines <joines@bus.okstate.edu> >>Subject: [Samba] Re: [SLE] Any way to do Linux User home directories via Samba >> To: samba@lists.samba.org >> Message-ID: <3F5C9255.9000006@bus.okstate.edu> >> Content-Type: text/plain;

All of our user authentication is done via LDAP. We have an all Linux backend and tons of windows desktops. We've just started getting a few people to move to Linux on the desktop. Is there any way that I can have their home directory automatically mounted via Samba when they log in? Thanks, Jason Joines Open Source = Open Mind ========================

Running the init on openSUSE and SLE machines showed up minor errors: * skip the /etc/mtab symlink creation if the file is already existing. * make sure /run/lvm is created or lvmetab will complain. --- appliance/init | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init index 413a95f..b22032e 100755 --- a/appliance/init +++ b/appliance/init @@

Hi, Can't really make sense of your diagram. How many clients have you got and what are trying to achieve? Also, what type of firewall are you trying to achieve, a masquerading/NAT one, (in which case you need routing turned on), or a application level one, (in which case you need it turned off). If you've got this many servers I would suggest you install masquerading/NAT firewall with

I don't believe the problem is with CUPS itself as the printer does print locally from the command line and from scripts. If the CUPS daemon was going dead, printing wouldn't work at all. Since the issue is also that windows systems (which now include XP Pro and XP Home laptops I tested on the network) AREN'T SEEING THE PRINTER IN ANY NETWORK BROWSING COMPONENT -- NETWORK

--- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c index e7beb26..381e396 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c @@ -790,6 +790,9 @@ emit_precossin(struct

Cross-posting scares me, but... Have you looked at the latest RPMs for SuSE, from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/samba/ ? They've worked like a charm for me, thus far (revision after revision, a simple rpm -U * seems to work...) -----Original Message----- From: david rankin [mailto:drankin@cox-internet.com] Sent: Mon 9/12/2005 5:30 PM To: samba; Suse Linux Subject: [SLE] SuSE 9.3 and

--- src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c index 16bf2f1..75c5cea 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nv50/nv50_program.c @@ -810,7 +810,11 @@ emit_precossin(struct

For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-06-15 01:04, Min Wai Chan wrote: > I agree, > If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it > would be easy... > However, it seem

I agree, If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it would be easy... However, it seem that they have something else running under samba/nfs to control the permission on the files/folder... I would like to use bidir sync because I like some of the synology feature on remote sync and etc which is making remote access much easier compare to samba... But these sync

Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >

I'm in the process of upgrading OpenLDAP from 2.0 to 2.2 and many Samba servers from 2.2 to 3.0 over the course of several weeks. I have a test setup using Samba 3 against OpenLDAP 2.2 with the Samba 3 schema. I would like to be able to point all my existing Samba 2.2 servers at the new directory while they wait their turn to be upgraded. I see that Samba 2.2 allows me to specify an

Hi Sebastien, Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? Thank you. S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org> ? 2015?6?15? ?????? > Hi > > rsync -a should be able to perform chown using usernames rather than uids > so your files would still be owned by the right user. > > Regards > > Le 14/06/2015 16:48, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > >> Dear

Is there any way to specify multiple LDAP servers for Samba to authenticate against? Jason Joines =================================

We use automounted user home directories on our CentOS 6.3 desktops, and on the desktops on which we start apache, I have noticed that all 900+ home directories listed in NIS get (and stay!) mounted. If I don't start apache, this doesn't happen. We don't need access to home directories from apache, so I would like to prevent apache from mounting these home directories, but I

Mount wontt be a solution since you'll force things to one uid/gid Why do you need bidir sync? Le 14/06/2015 20:01, Min Wai Chan a ?crit : > Hi Sebastien, > > Rsync is only one way right, any 2 way sync solution? > > Thank you. > > S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org> ? 2015?6?15? ?????? > >> Hi >> >> rsync -a should be able to

Hi, I have installed samba 3.5.4 on Centos 6 and have set it up to authenticate to a Windows 2008 Domain Controller. When I do a "su - some-domain-user", the home directory gets created. However, I want the home directory to be created when a user accesses the samba shares(no shell access). Following are the relevant configurations. What are the PAM changes I need to make? Help is much

Hello Bastien, 2015-06-08 15:07 GMT+02:00 Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-08 13:06 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net>: > >> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 09:45 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: >> > >> > >> > 2015-06-04 13:04 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net>: >> > > On Sat,

We need to manage /etc/passwd where there would be one line at the very end of the file to restrict access to all users not explictly allowed: +::::::/sbin/nologin If using delete_lines and append_if_no_such_lines (similar to this one at http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/528) to manage access control, each time a few new users got appended to /etc/passwd file, the above line would be

Salut Bastien 2015-06-04 13:04 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net>: > On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 18:51 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > > > > 2015-05-29 14:09 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net>: > > > On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 13:59 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > > Hi Richard and the list, > > > > > >