similar to: Printing to Windows XP printer from LFS-4.1 Linux via SAMBA 2.2.8

In the Red Hat Linux spec file for the 2.2.19 kernel, there is a note not to enable ext3 and LFS at the same time. I'm wondering whether this is an old note, and that it is safe to use ext3 0.0.7a on a system with LFS enabled, or if there are still issues with it. I'm aware that 0.0.7a is a really old version, and 2.2 isn't the most modern kernel, but it is what I have to work with.

Hello, I found my samba can only support files no larger than 2GB. Searched internet for a while and learned I need the LFS patch. The problem is where can I found them? The link from google seems unreachable. I found the patch is smbfs-2.4.16-lfs.patch and samba-2.2.2-lfs.patch, but I'm running kernel 2-4-20 and samba-2.2.7a, so the newer kernel and samba doesn't include these LFS patch?

Hallo altogether! First of all I want to thank the developers for the great codec! But I have the following problem now: I have built my own Linux from Scratch and also compiled everything that is necessary to have ogg and vorbis and tools for de- and encoding. Just the encoding turned out to have very poor quality independent how high I set the quality level. It has some kind

Hello, lfs prints different obd(idx) compared to lctl dl. We use single striping. cluster1 tmp # lfs find --obd scia-OST0017_UUID /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1 /data/scia/L0/V0.00/20100327/SCI_NL__0PNPDE20100327_193441_000040582088_00071_42209_1158.N1 cluster1 tmp # lfs getstripe

Hi, The LFS page hosted on suse's servers states that smbfs has probs with large files and it seems to be a bit out-of-date. http://www.suse.de/~aj/linux_lfs.html I can't correct him with authority, but maybe one of the team should. -------------- Martyn Ranyard I am not a member of the samba team, and anything that I say may not be as accurate as a response from one of the

< This patch is against openssh-2.5.2p2 > Here's a few lines we changed a while back in "scp.c" to get it to transfer large (>2GB) file on a 32-bit system using LFS. Obviously, you don't want the line hard-coded in that sets _FILE_OFFSET_BIT=64, but perhaps you could make it a configure option. (Is it already perhaps?) Do you agree that these lines are neccessary

This patch allows lhype_add to open disk image files larger than 2GB. Please apply. Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com> --- diff -r 82d084b15417 drivers/lhype/lhype_add.c --- a/drivers/lhype/lhype_add.c Wed Nov 15 00:58:18 2006 -0500 +++ b/drivers/lhype/lhype_add.c Wed Nov 15 01:01:35 2006 -0500 @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int set_up_block_device(const cha struct stat st;

This patch allows lhype_add to open disk image files larger than 2GB. Please apply. Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com> --- diff -r 82d084b15417 drivers/lhype/lhype_add.c --- a/drivers/lhype/lhype_add.c Wed Nov 15 00:58:18 2006 -0500 +++ b/drivers/lhype/lhype_add.c Wed Nov 15 01:01:35 2006 -0500 @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int set_up_block_device(const cha struct stat st;

Re: Below I am using samba samba-3.0.0beta2-1.i386.rpm I had previously been on the latest redhat version of samba ... I need large file support... Do you know of a patch for the newer sambas or do I have to go backwards? (see reference below) I have a samba-2.2.5-1.i386.rpm but then I have to patch the kernel... redhat have some many kernel patches that this would seem to pose a constant

Has anyone tried LFS (ie >2G files support) and Ext3 together? Are there good reasons why this should/should not work? I see the RH enterprise kernel patch set specifically does not attempt both lfs and ext3, but the lfs patches themselves touch some reasonably localised parts of ext2, so I would hope (without having dived in there to test), that the ext3 changes would mirror that

This is a linux from scratch based on the 2.4.13 kernel. I'm using a GCC 2.95.3, autoconf 2.52, and automake 1.5. Libvorbis compilation fails with a Signal 11 error as shown below. I had the same results with 2.4.12, 2.4.10, and 2.4.9. I've compiled hundreds of other packages without getting this error, and I've even tried changing the memory. This is my configure line, I used

This is a linux from scratch based on the 2.4.13 kernel. I'm using a GCC 2.95.3, autoconf 2.52, and automake 1.5. Libvorbis compilation fails with a Signal 11 error as shown below. I had the same results with 2.4.12, 2.4.10, and 2.4.9. I've compiled hundreds of other packages without getting this error, and I've even tried changing the memory. This is my configure line, I used

Hi, I am trying to print from my Debian unstable Notebook to a printer that is connected to a Windows 2000 Server. Target environment is CUPS which uses smbspool as a front-end, and smbspool gives a strange error message. | export DEVICE_URI="smb://account:password@domain/server/printer" | smbspool foo bar Title 1 ignore Makefile gives the error message | ERROR: ERRHRD - ERRgeneral

Hello, I am using smbspool and I seem to be getting an error that I can't find a solution to. I checked Google, Usenet and the samba archives. I seem to find people with the problem, but no answer. When I try to use the smbspool program, I get the following error: > root@HomeLinux:/home/steve# smbspool smb://192.168.1.4/LaserPrinter 0 0 0 0 0 README > ERROR: cli_session_request()

I tried at work to run "/usr/bin/smbspool" manually: --- $ /usr/bin/smbspool Xerox-WorkCentre-5325 \'5\' \'yugiohjcj\' \'2.pdf\' \'1\' DEBUG: Connected with username/password... --- The behavior at work is different from the one at home because it is not the same computer used and the /etc/samba/smb.conf is available. However, as you can see above, the

Hi, I'm cannot get smbspool to print to a kerberized windows printer through cups. Kerberos is working, and both smbclient and smbspool can connect to the server. Even though sending a formatted page manually with smbspool works, cups returns "Unable to connect to CIFS host, will retry in 60 seconds..." I read an older post here:

I run Samba 2.2.8 on my Red Hat 9. Both smbd and nmbd are running OK. ps -aux | grep mbd shows the 2 processes, plus, smbclient works fine, thanks to Christopher. The Samba server resides on a host with IP 10.10.6.31. I got this from the smbclient run below: [root@RedHat samba]# smbclient //REDHAT/test -U jack added interface ip=10.10.6.31 bcast=10.10.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Password: And

Hi, We have unified logons on Linux and Windows clients by using a Windows 2000 AD domain with pam_winbind/nss_winbind on linux clients, the problem is, smbclient and smbspool still require us to enter a password instead of using the logged on users credentials. Is there anyway to pam-enable smbclient and smbspool? Hesham S. Ahmed __________________________________________________ Do You

Should I actually have a "radiofree.ogg" file being written on my Linux box? If so, I don't see it. I'll try a different player as well. --- Kerry Cox <kerry.cox@ksl.com> wrote: > Winamp3 is broken according to some posts here. Try > Winamp 2.91 or the > latest XMMS. Of course, XMMS requires the xmms-mp3 > libraries. > Try that and see if it helps. > KJ

Hi Folks, Just looking for a little direction here. 1) windows ADS server with printers. 2) linux workstations which use smb to authenticate users to win ADS server, and auto mounts there home directories through smb. Question: Printing from linux workstation? I know I can use smbspool to print, but this requires user password. Can I automate this so there is no need for password? Because the