similar to: Journal Usage

Hello, I have this bug report that I have filed. Is there any specific reason why samba behaves this way, and doesn't use the unix semantics? Since this is even more restrictive than unix semantics, I'm more inclined to call it a bug until I know it's supposed to be this way. Any ideas? ----- Forwarded message from Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> ----- From: Mike Fedyk

Hello. On a server running 2.4.25, I have the two following errors in the kernel logfile: Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Unexpected dirty buffer encountered at do_get_write_access:618 (08:11 blocknr 920707) Should I worry about them (disk failure, filesystem damage) ? Thanks. As an addition what does the pair '08:11' means ? Is

ALL: <<diffserv-gred_10-06>> I have attached the current script that I am using. $TC qdisc add dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred setup DPs 3 default 2 grio $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 1 limit $lim min $minTh max $maxTh avpkt $avgPL burst $bursty bandwidth $netBand probability 0.02 prio 2 $TC qdisc change dev $EDEV parent 2:20 gred DP 2 limit $lim min $minTh max

Can it be that our accounting packages don't work on SMB and only with NT? I would HATE to put a NT Box into the mix. Ruben -- Brooklyn Linux Solutions http://www.mrbrklyn.com http://www.brooklynonline.com 1-718-382-5752

----- Forwarded message from Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> ----- On Wednesday September 19, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:08:32PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > > On Sunday September 16, mfedyk@matchmail.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm trying to

Hi, I'm using the setup defined for my RH9 box to participate in a Win2000 domain. I have server = domain, etc. This has been working fine for several months. As of this morning, one user can no longer access samba shares. His account settings haven't changed. I am able to access shares from his workstation using my account. I checked the log for his workstation. He has a number of

Hi, I'm running 2.4.9-ac7 with ext3 compiled in, and I ran across this problem. Now that I look back, it makes sence, but it wasn't obvious at first... I wanted to change the journal mode on my / partition, so I changed my fstab to: /dev/hda1 / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro,data=journal 0 1 as well as several other partitions, and rebooted. After rebooting I had a read only / that I

This patch fixes the data loss which can occur when unmounting a data=journal ext3 filesystem. The core problem is that the VFS doesn't tell the filesystem enough about what is happening. ext3 _needs_ to know the difference between regular memory-cleansing writeback and sync-for-data-integrity purposes. (These two operations are really quite distinct, and the kernel has got it wrong for

Take a look at this output from lsof: smbd 11490 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 afpd 31010 0 2u REG 3,3 3207 1136655 auction - envelope.rtf afpd 31010 0 5u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work File L 1 afpd 31010 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 smbd 31386 0 9u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work

Hi Ted and all, I have a couple of questions near the end of this message, but first I have to describe my problem in some detail. The power failure on Thursday did something evil to my ext3 file system (box running RH9+patches, ext3, /dev/md0, raid5 driver, 400GB f/s using 3x200GB IDE drives and one hot-spare). The f/s got corrupt badly and the symptoms are very similar to what Eddy described

This was sent to lkml, I think it may be interesting to this list... ----- Forwarded message from "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> ----- Envelope-to: mfedyk@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 16:38:49 -0800 From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> To: Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: ext3 for

Hi, I've been wondering exactly what you gain by using journaled mode over ordered mode. Are there any known cases where journaled mode could recover where ordered mode wouldn't? Mike

Is anyone else getting messages from the lists.digium.com mail server with errors about a mail loop? I've been getting this for the last few weeks, but I don't have any list software on my server. Any ideas?

Hi, I've got this strange problem where a striped endpoint will crash when I try to use cp to copy files off of it but not when I use rsync to copy files off: [user at gluster5 user]$ cp -r Python-2.6.4/ ~/tmp/ cp: reading `Python-2.6.4/Lib/lib2to3/tests/data/fixers/myfixes/__init__.py': Software caused connection abort cp: closing

looks like you sent this to the wrong person... ----- Forwarded message from JON GERDES <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> ----- Envelope-to: mikef@mikef-linux-x86.matchmail.com Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:18:43 -0800 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:17:40 +0000 From: "JON GERDES" <GERDESJ@gkn-whl.co.uk> To: <mfedyk@matchmail.com> Subject: Re: win98-samba2.0.7 = Network

I am seeing extremely slow performance with glusterfs. OS: CentOS 5 glusterfs version: glusterfs-1.3.9-1 Server configuration: ############################################## ### GlusterFS Server Volume Specification ## ############################################## #### CONFIG FILE RULES: ### "#" is comment character. ### - Config file is case sensitive ### - Options within a

What is really puzzling me is that the ataraid device (/dev/ataraid/d0p1 mounted as /bigdisk) 2x 123GB IBM Deskstar's is formated as ext2...top and ps etc... show a fight between kjournald and kupdated and all searches for kjournald or kupdated fights suggest ext3 issues... :-) It's a RedHat 7.2, 2.4.7-10 custom kernal (I added in the Promise FastTrak support and HIGH mem support to

Hello again, Is it possible to split a bandwidth equally among clients regardless of its current link speed? I have a link that can get bursty at times. At any given time the N active sessions (the ones with non-empty queues) need to be serviced simultaneously, each at a rate of 1/N''th of the link speed. My case is an internet connection that oscillates between 96 kbps and 256 kbps. I

journal.c: In function 'guestfs__journal_get': journal.c:120:9: error: #pragma GCC diagnostic not allowed inside functions journal.c:121:9: error: #pragma GCC diagnostic not allowed inside functions journal.c:123:9: error: #pragma GCC diagnostic not allowed inside functions make[3]: *** [libguestfs_la-journal.lo] Error 1 Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> --- Not compiled.

Is it possible to have nested MySQL queries in extensions.conf? Ie, perform a query, grab a value, and then jump to another location in the dialplan and do another query based on that original value. I'm having problems with the result and fetchid's and I'm not sure if it's even possible to do this or not. Thanks, Doug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML