similar to: Adding Windows servers to a Samba PDC network

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Adding Windows servers to a Samba PDC network"

2003 Aug 10
9
DID IT! - Samba 2.2.8a+LDAP+PDC
I am so stoked I just had to share this with y'all. I just "SEAMLESSLY" migrated all of my machines and users over to my new Gentoo Linux Server. I even kept the same: domain name and old PDC NetBios name. The trickiest part was getting all of the users to keep their same profile, but I managed that by cloning the RID and Lanman/NT hashes for the user accounts. Free at last! #
1999 Jan 03
31
Samba problem
Hi, I have a problem connecting my Windows98 to the Samba server. The Linux computer comes up in the "Network Neighborhood" control panel, but when I double click on the icon, W98 asks for a password for the "\\machine name\IPC$" resource. But my password will not me accepted. I have logged in as user "root" with a given password on both computers. When I set
2003 Jul 12
4
Samba-2.2.8a /LDAP can't join domain
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Phelps [mailto:sphelps@ridgways.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:19 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: Samba-2.2.8a & LDAP - Can't join Domain - SID mapping error Hi everyone, I am at my wits end and am hoping one of you can help me out. I am getting the following error when attempting to join Windows XP/2000 machine to the domain:
2007 Apr 14
2
Samba -> WinXP: slow transfers, partial solution
Hello All, I'm running Samba 3.0.24 as PDC and file server on Gentoo Linux, AMD64, 2.6.19 kernel, 100MBit/s network, and experience quite slow file transfers from Samba to WinXP SP2 clients: the speed is varying, but is about 1-2Mb/s at best. I spent quite some time investigating the issue, here are the intermediate results: 1) This happens only when transferring _from_ _Samba_ to
2003 Nov 05
1
samba PDC on FreeBSD question
Evening everyone. I am going to be changing our current Samba PDC running Red Hat, to a FreeBSD server. I was curious if anyone out there, who is currently using FreeBSD as a PDC could give me their feedback on how it is working. Also, if they had any suggestions or recommendations regarding Samba on FreeBSD. Maybe even what they like and dislike about it. I would imagine, it should be the
2016 May 23
3
Syslinux fwrite support
> -----Original Message----- > From: Gene Cumm [mailto:gene.cumm at gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 4:44 PM > To: Tal Lubko > Cc: For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa > Subject: Re: [syslinux] Syslinux fwrite support > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Tal Lubko <tallubko at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message-----
2002 Dec 13
3
Problem authenticating with Samba (security=domain) + Windows 2000 PDC
Hi all!! I'd set up my samba 2.2.7 to auth with "security=domain" mode, but my clients cannot auth successfully never because the samba server cannot "talk" correctly with my PDC(w2k adv. Server). In the computer manager event, I see authentication request but with empty usernames......so the PDC reject the authentication request. Is this a know
2005 Oct 16
2
Lost packets and strange "behaviour" of my TC rules
Hi all. I''m going on my 3rd week trying to get a simple traffic shapping to work the right way :( !! My goal it to shape the traffic coming from one machine (pc1) to another machine (pc2) throught the "eth0" interface. My test configuration is as follows: PC1   IP: 192.168.105.237   Mask: 255.255.255.0   OS: Red Hat Linux Kernel 2.4.20-8   Rules:
2016 May 21
2
Syslinux fwrite support
> -----Original Message----- > From: Gene Cumm [mailto:gene.cumm at gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 1:07 PM > To: Tal Lubko > Cc: syslinux at zytor.com > Subject: Re: [syslinux] Syslinux fwrite support > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Tal Lubko via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > Hi > > Does Syslinux support fwrite for fat
2003 May 15
6
Question on LDAP+Samba+PDC
Hello everyone. Well, I have been working very hard lately, trying to get a server up to act as our Samba PDC with LDAP. So far, everything seems to be working well. I've been able to get samba 2.2.8 and openldap 2.0.27 installed with no problems. I've setup my config files (ldap.conf, slapd.conf, smb.conf) as well as added some initial entries to the LDAP directory. I've been
2013 Jul 26
2
[PATCH 1/1] core: Add a check at ldlinux.sys build time.
On 07/26/2013 01:36 PM, Raphael S Carvalho wrote: > > Bootsector is installed into the 0-512 range, whereas 2 copies of ADV > into (65536 - 2 * ADV_SIZE). > Then basically ldlinux.sys must fit between the bootsector and two > copies of ADV whose size may vary. > > The range 0-64k is laid out something like this, right?! > [0](bootsector)[512](ldlinux.sys)[65536 - 2 *
2017 Dec 16
3
Clang 5, UBsan, runtime error: addition of unsigned offset to X overflowed to Y
We have code that processes a buffer in the forward or backwards direction. It looks similar to the following (https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/adv-simd.h#L1138): uint8_t * ptr = ... size_t len = ... size_t inc = 16; if (flags & REVERSE_DIRECTION) { ptr += len - inc; inc = 0-inc; } while (len > 16) { // process blocks ptr += inc; len -= 16; } Clang
2014 Jun 08
2
How to use --once? Does it work?
> > To be clear, I am not saying there is no bug - there might be. > I performed the following test with several versions of Syslinux: 1_ Execute: 'extlinux --once=non_default_label --install /mnt/sda1' ; 2_ In first reboot, the "non_default_label" should be executed; 3_ In second reboot, the default label should be executed. Results: _ 4.05 to 4.07: OK. _
2002 Jun 27
3
Samba as a PDC -- HELP NEEDED
Hi Samba Support, I'm in an all Windows environment with about 60 Win XP workstations and 10 Win 2K Pros, served by a Win 2K Server and have mails on Exchange 2000. But Mine!! and I mean Mine! stability is a problem! I read about the ability of Samba as a PDC. Please I need to implement this technology quickly to the situation and buttress my initial arguement that the right choice was an X
2014 Dec 24
0
[PATCH 0/8] extlinux: support unmounted ext2/3/4 filesystem
On 12/24/2014 12:16 AM, Robert Yang wrote: > Hello syslinux, > > Merry Christmas! These patches will make extlinux work with umounted > ext2/3/4 filesystem, for example: > > $ extlinux -i /dev/sdXN > or > $ extlinux -i file_block > > Also it can work with something like: > $ extlinux /dev/sdXN --reset-adv > or > $ extlinux file_block --reset-adv >
2013 Jul 26
2
[PATCH 1/1] core: Add a check at ldlinux.sys build time.
On 07/26/2013 08:10 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul, at 08:05:16AM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: >> Check if ldlinux.sys is larger than 64k at build time. >> >> Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> >> --- >> core/Makefile | 5 +++-- >> core/ldlinux_limit.pl | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2
2013 Aug 08
1
HG changes affecting received headers
Let me say this is a rather cosmetic issue, but it appears with the latest commits (around 2.2.5 release) the scheme of 'Received' headers has changed for LMTP: 1) Inet socket: Return-Path: <dfn-adv-bounces at dfn-cert.de> Delivered-To: <tlx at leuxner.net> Received: from spectre.leuxner.net ([188.138.0.199]) by spectre.leuxner.net (Dovecot) with LMTP id
2018 Mar 14
0
Fwd: Learning advanced R
I've found two problems in interpreting adv-r-master/book/build-book.r: 1. All pathes in build-book.r refer to the starting-directory "adv-r-master". However, the script build-book.r is located in the directory "book", which is located in directory "adv-r-master". Therefore, pathes starting at "." are wrong (should start at ".."). 2. Some
2015 Nov 13
4
[PATCH] extlinux: code cleanup and simplification
Merge btrfs_read_adv and xfs_read_adv into a single generic function ext_read_adv and split ext_write_adv_offset out of ext_write_adv. Use those new functions in rewrite_boot_image and btrfs_install_file where it is actually hardcoded. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Cornu <nicolac76 at yahoo.fr> --- extlinux/main.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 55
2013 Dec 18
1
Initial support for sector size >512
On 12/16/2013 05:18 AM, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > Surely should apply to 4.xx where they was developed but I think I send > them for 5.xx. mbr part of patches was merged time ago. > Unfortunately I had no time to update other patches. If I remember there > was a problem on the way ADV was implemented (using the same sector). > > Unfortunately my company business required to