similar to: Garbage in smbstatus

I am running Samba version 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6. When I run smbstatus, it coredumps. Here is some detailed information that may help in killing this bug. This is a run of smbstatus where it coredumps, and afterwards, a gdb session. root@grads:/depot/samba-2.0.6/bin 174# ./smbstatus Samba version 2.0.6 Service uid gid pid machine ----------------------------------------------

Alex, On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:30:01PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still > open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually > open it on the same host without any problems: I don't see where you're opening the file twice from one smbclient below. Am I missing something? And then there's no

On 23/10/16 10:00, Ralph Böhme wrote: > Alex, > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:30:01PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: >> I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still >> open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually >> open it on the same host without any problems: > I don't see where you're opening the file twice from

I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly sometimes. I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to be solved yet. The only

Hi there, I'm following your list for several months, as we run a CTDB cluster of Samba gateways over our distributed filesystem. I decided to post my first message to resume an old thread (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-October/204043.html), hoping to progress and reach some conclusion. Essentially, we observe and can reproduce issues when attempting to lock a given file

I help an NT admin that has recently added a redhat 8.0 based samba server to his network. the share is one that is a core service for the operation of the business and has about 50 users constantly accessing data from several accounting and tax preparation applications. One of the primary applications requires update farily recently as of late and the admin is having problems getting all files

Hello! I sent this message to samba-technical yesterday but as I saw no response (not even a RTFM ;), I'm crossposting. I just need some help to track down this bug. I can write a patch if I can find the guilt... ----- Forwarded message from "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@conectiva.com.br> ----- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:34:41 -0200 From: "Luis Claudio R.

Hi, I've a huge problem with Samba. It's the PDC of the school LAN. Clients are NTWS 4. Samba has been up and running for 11 days and now, since 2 days, force me to reboot the whole server everyday to work. I explain : when doing an "ps aux" or "smbstatus", i saw A LOT of "smbd -D" started for the same user 10 times in about 2 minutes. When I try to kill

Hi list, recently upgraded from 3.0.10 to 3.0.21a on debian sarge. Congratulations guy 's many problems gone but .......... a) a couple of users reported the following: If they open outlook for the first time they are not able to send/receive emails. If they close/open oulook the second time everything is fine. I 'd set a high debug level and observed the log but nothing that will

hello, can anybody explain or point me to a document that explain the locked files section produced by smbstatus -L (see below). what means denymode ? access ? what means exclusive+batch in the oplock section ? can anybody point me to a document explaining the way file locking works ? regards # smbstatus -L Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name

Hi, I updated from Samba 2.2.5 to 2.2.8a. und Redhat 6.2 and since then, smbstatus shows strange values The dates and the pid's are wrong. Any ideas? Was there a change in a locking.tdb? Do I have to remove it? Greetings Hansj?rg 28643 DENY_NONE 0x3f407996 RDONLY LEVEL_II ?7??W? Tue Jan 6 22:38:12 1970 1633824626 0x706d622e NONE ?7??W? Thu Jan 1 02:00:00 1970 1836017711 0x56414143

I got a very similar issue like the following link. https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-November/159606.html Environment: samba-3.5.6 arm linux 2.6.31.8 smb.conf with "reset on vc zero = yes" Here's the procedure to reproduce: 1. Copy a file from PC to samba device 2. Unplug the LAN port during copying (simulate the flaky network) 3. Then the samba client timeout 4. Plug the

Hello, we frequently face locking issues with office applications and documents on samba shares. The office applications claim that the document is locked and hence no write access is possible. I can check on the samba server that there is no concurrent access/locking from other computers or users. It looks like the same user holds some lock and is denied to access the document because it?s

Hi, I just installed Samba 3.0.4 on a Solaris 2.6 server. I had no problem compiling, intalling and configuring it, and everything seems to go OK. People can connect to all the configured shares without any problem. But I have some problems when getting server status either via SWAT/STATUS or using smbstatus: First, in the "Client" field of the SWAT/STATUS report I have problems

I have a user who was having problem accessing samba. So I suggested him to try to login from other system to see if it's problem with his pc or his account. Then he found that when he used other person's PC, it didn't ask for password at all and gave full access to his account! The two person's accounts are totally different. Any idea? Thanks. --

Hi Ralph, I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually open it on the same host without any problems: host 1: smbclient -U ajc //172.31.0.120/ifa_v ... smb: \jmi\Corporate Accounting\ISL Ltd Accounts\2016\1609\> open "201609 213_ ISL Balance sheet variance analysis.xls" open file

Hi folks. I continue to fight with regular locking database damage in Linux box. See Bugzilla Bug 370. The current question to gurus: what is the RIGHT behavoir of locking.tdb size? Should it decrease when the number of records decreases? Or, it should stay at maximal reached capacity? Alexey

I first asked this question at the end of October, got a response which didn't solve the problem, and have finally got back to the issue now. I'm running 2.2.7a, recently upgraded from 2.2.0 as Domain Logons for Win2K were suspected to be part of my problem. Anyway, the issue relates to AutoCAD (actually a vertical product called Land3) and a command which works with winXX boxes, but

Dear all, I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12 On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them. After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well, We get on windows when we try to open the network drive

All, I'm running the latest stable version of SerNet-Samba on a Debian Sarge box (I switched from the traditional Samba package for certain reasons which I won't delve into here), but I've come across a serious issue. Every day, the Samba processes become so numerous that the server begins acting really flaky. That is to say, there are so many smbd -D processes that the server