similar to: Got strange message when using wbinfo/winbind on Samba-3 beta3

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Got strange message when using wbinfo/winbind on Samba-3 beta3"

2003 Sep 02
1
Something is broken in Samba3.0-rc2 compared to Samba3.0-rc1
Hi, After the bug 380 was fixed I recompiled Samba3.0-rc2 using Sun One Studio 8 on my Solaris 9 box. I joind my Windows 2003 Server. net ADS JOIN -U Administrator Started winbindd and did wbinfo tests and all worked. Run smbclient locally to connect to the samba-server and it failed with session setup failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER. My W2000 client can't access the samba server any
2003 Sep 04
0
smbclient is broken and W2k can't connect to Samba3.0-rc2
Hi, I have done the same test since Samba-3 alfa. - Compiled the source - Joined the W2003 server - Winbind works - wbinfo tests passed - Connect to samba using smbclient fails with session setup failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER - W2K client can't brows or connect to Samba. I have attached the debugging info from smbclient. I have also bug-reported this. /Patrik My smb.conf file: #
2003 Jul 04
0
Winbind in samba3-beta2 is broken compered to samba3-beta1 on solaris
I compiled samba3-beta2 with the same argument, kerberos- and ldap libraries as for samba3-beta1. The ADS join worked as it should. I am using the same smb.conf file as before: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 10.0.0.254 (10.0.0.254) # Date: 2003/06/03 15:37:08 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SAMBA-NET password server = * ads server = w2003server
2003 Jun 05
0
Problems joining W2003 PDC with Samba 3.0 alpha 24
I know the Q has been asked, but I havn't seen the answer. I have PDC in native mode The ADS name is test.se The domain-name is SAMBA-NET The name of the pdc is W2003SERVER ( 10.0.0.20) In smb.conf have the following settings workgroup = SAMBA-NET ; ads server = 10.0.0.20 password server = W2003SERVER netbios name = SAMBA server string = Samba (%v)
2003 Jun 23
1
Strange UID/GID mapping in Samba-3beta1 and Win2003 server
I have strange uid/gid problem. I am testing Samba 3-beta1 and Samba is ADS member to W2003 server. Everythings work, wbinfo, getent passwd and so on. Now to the problem: When I list the users with getent passwd I get: Administrator:x:10000:10000:Administrator:/global/mnt1/SAMBA/home/TEST.SE/administrator:/bin/sh Guest:x:10001:10002:Guest:/global/mnt1/SAMBA/home/TEST.SE/guest:/bin/sh
2003 Jun 10
0
Problem to get winbind working for Samba3-beta1 on Solaris 9 against W2003 PDC
My smb.conf global] workgroup = SAMBA-NET password server = * ;ads server = w2000server netbios name = SAMBA server string = Samba (%v) domain (%h) interfaces = hahostix1/255.255.0.0 bind interfaces only = Yes client use spnego = no ;use spnego = no security = domain private dir = /global/mnt1/SAMBA/private log
2003 Jun 16
2
WinBind - 3.0.0beta1
I am trying to get WinBind working against Windows 2000 ADS. I am following the document http://de.samba.org/samba/devel/docs/html/winbind.html. I have successfully joined the samba server to the PDC domain. /usr/local/samba/bin/net join -S PDC -U Administrator The winbindd starts successfully however when I try to use wbinfo -u it returns. [root@jerry root]# /usr/local/samba/bin/wbinfo -u
2003 Jul 04
1
Is it sombody who has a working pam.conf for Solaris 9 ?
Hi, I am trying to setup PAM for telnet on my solaris 9 box and the pam_winbind grant me access but I recieve a acount failure: Jul 4 13:29:59 clusterix1 pam_winbind[9688]: user 'patrikg' granted acces Jul 4 13:29:59 clusterix1 login[9688]: login account failure: Permission denied The values in pam.conf for winbind is: login auth required /usr/lib/security/pam_winbind.so other
2002 Aug 30
4
Enhancement of wbinfo in samba2.2.6pre2
Hi, Most of the samba-commands takes a option for smb.conf file exept for wbinfo. It should be nice to have that functionallity in wbinfo also. /Patrik -- "In a world without fences who needs Gates" Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant patrik.gustavsson@sun.com Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.sweden Mobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS
2003 Aug 02
1
beta3 winbind and win2003 server
I'm using samba3-beta3 successfully against a Win2000 AD domain controller, but cannot get winbind woking with a Win2003 AD domain controller. The samba log gives: [2003/08/02 17:35:51, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_negprot(1019) cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. [2003/08/02 17:35:51, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_full_connection(1319) failed negprot Has
2003 Jun 24
2
Samba3-beta1 as a PDC and using tdbsam as passdb backend it takes the home-directory info from /etc/passwd
I didn't get any answers so I try again: I am using tdbsam as passdb backand. I have added root user with pdbedit. The machine trust account was added on the fly. I have added the user with pdbedit. I have created the user in /etc/passwd. When the user logs in from a W2k and mounts the home-directory I noticed that Samba didn't take the home-directory information from tdbsam, it
2009 Dec 22
3
How do I make rsync ignore unreadable files (damaged sectors)?
Lately I've working on a backup script that utilize rsync together with MySQL logging. Everything has been working just fine until now when I needed to generate some errors for my error handling code. So I took a CD (which I scratched with a needle) and mounted it to the file system. There after I started the backup job which went on forever and never got completed. It seems that rsync
2004 Jan 29
3
A samba locking question
Hi, Maybe this is a stupid question, but any way Will samba use fcntl locking if level 1 and 2 oplocks is disabled and samba is not compiled with spin-locks enabled ? I am using Samba on solaris /Patrik -- "In a world without fences who needs Gates" Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant patrik.gustavsson@sun.com Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.sweden
2003 Jun 18
1
My Samba 3.0beta1 stopped working as ADS member
I had a working Samba 3.0beta1 as ADS member of a W2003 server. My w2000 client could log in to the W2003 server and use services on Samba (home directory). Winbind is working. So I tried to re-do all my work again. And suddenly the w2k can use any services on Samba anymore. The output from the logfile tells me it's kerberos problem: [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:(126)
2006 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
Hello! I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial enviroment? Regards Jonas Gustavsson
2004 Jan 29
10
Back to 3.0.1, Winbind and Solaris 9
I've gone back to 3.0.1 to try and get winbind to work with my Solaris 9 machine and NT4 domain. Everything works except user authentication. The wbinfo and getent commands do what they are supposed to. I've included a truss of 'su - ganguly' According to pamlog, the user 'ganguly' has been granted access but it is still hanging. How do I do a truss of a telnet login?
2011 Sep 07
1
3.5.6 : WINBINDD: cli_negprot failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED with Active Directory
Dear Have connected SAMBA to an Active Directory server The getent did not show any user and winbindd claim : [2011/09/07 11:33:29.417355, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:1769(cli_negprot_done) cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and the server doesn't support it. [2011/09/07 11:33:29.417444, 1] winbindd/winbindd_cm.c:856(cm_prepare_connection) cli_negprot failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
2006 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:53:05AM +0100, Jonas Gustavsson wrote: > I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was > wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a > commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other > related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial > enviroment? LLVM's license is a
2002 Aug 30
1
syslinux unable to find vmlinuz
Hi: Two scripts (mkbd.fails and mkbd.works) are attached to this message. The only difference between them is in how syslinux.cfg (on a RedHat boot image) is replaced. mkbd.fails: syslinux.cfg is replaced via "mv -f". vmlinuz can't be found. mkbd.works: syslinux.cfg is replaced via "cp". vmlinuz is found. The only difference I can see between these two methods is that
2006 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
In addition, there are groups at STMicroelectronics and at Siemens that have used or are considering using LLVM. Note that these are internal development projects for now -- they (and Apple) have not publicly announced products based on LLVM. --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ On Feb 14, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at