similar to: DID IT! - Samba 2.2.8a+LDAP+PDC

-----Original Message----- From: Scott Phelps [mailto:sphelps@ridgways.com] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:19 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: Samba-2.2.8a & LDAP - Can't join Domain - SID mapping error Hi everyone, I am at my wits end and am hoping one of you can help me out. I am getting the following error when attempting to join Windows XP/2000 machine to the domain:

Hi everyone. Just wanted to ask a question here. We are running RH 7.3 as our samba PDC. Everything is working great and im really enjoying the setup. However, we need to add two Windows 2000 Adv. Servers to our Domain because of software that we run on this. I probably already know the answer, but I figured I would ask this anyway. The default account on the Windows servers is

Hi, I have a problem connecting my Windows98 to the Samba server. The Linux computer comes up in the "Network Neighborhood" control panel, but when I double click on the icon, W98 asks for a password for the "\\machine name\IPC$" resource. But my password will not me accepted. I have logged in as user "root" with a given password on both computers. When I set

I *know* there has been a lot going on, and congratulations on getting CentOS 8 out! But(!), I don't see any updates to CO 7.7.1908 in the "updates" directory on the mirrors I typically use. All the files date from Sept. 14th. Is something broken? -- *Matt Phelps* *Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator* (Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical

On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release > names would > have been nice. We did. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-February/012873.html -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26201 Summary: Some screen garbage, NoAccel and GPU lockup reported with NV4E Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 08:18, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 6:33 AM Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 10/3/19 9:35 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 at 13:52, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> > > wrote: > > >> > >

On 04/02/2015 02:29 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 04/02/2015 01:28 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >> >>> Soliciting our feedback *before* changing everything regarding release >>> names would >>> have been nice. >>> >> >> We

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Karanbir Singh > Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6 > its been withdrawn upstream. > > given the level of interest in getting this built - can we not get > enough attention to

Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu

On 04/12/2017 09:36 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> To be honest Freenode is nice and I'd be sad to see it replaced with >> anything. >> So cool to be a "/join #project" away from getting help. >> >> > IRC is a problem for those of us behind government/corporate firewalls.

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, March 22, 2017 7:46 am, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > Red Hat released RHEL 6.9 yesterday. > > > > Why isn't CentOS 6.9 out yet? :) > > > Somebody has to do a hard work, I'm sure. Thanks, guys for the great work > you are doing! > > Or you as

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

On 07/12/15 16:17, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large > enterprise environment. It is usually blocked. > Does google hangout work ? we might be able to also setup a phone dial in setup -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26193 Summary: nouveau falls back to NoAccel on 9400M Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: bjt23

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat > continues to push out updates even. E.g. > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html > that looks like Supplementary content - we've never

On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get >>> this to work, since it's

I'm trying to get the BLF to work correctly on my Polycom phones. I have the buddy watch working correctly, but can't get the BLF to change based on the state... Example: When an extension is ringing, I get the same 'red light' that I get when the extension is actually in use... I was wondering if anyone had any experience with getting the Polycom phone to

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/04/2016 04:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released: > > <snip> > > 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! > > And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3 > Sources. The main tree will be labeled '7.3.1611' on

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Yamaban <foerster at lisas.de> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:56, Johnny Hughes <johnny at ...> wrote: > >> On 03/08/2017 09:39 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/08/2017 09:10 AM, m.roth at